1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Johnsson, Åse (Allansdotter), 1966, et al.
(author)
-
Nodule detection by chest tomosynthesis
- 2009
-
In: 2nd World Congress of Thoracic Imaging and Diagnosis in Chest Disease, 30 May-2 June 2009, Valencia, Spain.
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases.
- 2008
-
In: Radiology. - : Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). - 1527-1315 .- 0033-8419. ; 249:3, s. 1034-1041
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To compare chest tomosynthesis with chest radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules by using multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Regional Ethical Review Board approved this study, and all participants gave informed consent. Four thoracic radiologists acted as observers in a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study conducted in 42 patients with and 47 patients without pulmonary nodules examined with chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography. Multidetector CT served as reference method. The observers marked suspected nodules on the images by using a four-point rating scale for the confidence of presence. The JAFROC figure of merit was used as the measure of detectability. The number of lesion localizations relative to the total number of lesions (lesion localization fraction [LLF]) and the number of nonlesion localizations relative to the total number of cases (nonlesion localization fraction [NLF]) were determined. RESULTS: Performance of chest tomosynthesis was significantly better than that of chest radiography with regard to detectability (F statistic = 32.7, df = 1, 34.8, P < .0001). For tomosynthesis, the LLF for the smallest nodules (< or = 4 mm) was 0.39 and increased with an increase in size to an LLF for the largest nodules (> 8 mm) of 0.83. The LLF for radiography was small, except for the largest nodules, for which it was 0.52. In total, the LLF was three times higher for tomosynthesis. The NLF was approximately 50% higher for tomosynthesis. CONCLUSION: For the detection of pulmonary nodules, the performance of chest tomosynthesis is better, with increased sensitivity especially for nodules smaller than 9 mm, than that of chest radiography.
|
|
7. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
Detection of mild emphysema by computed tomography density measurements
- 2005
-
In: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 46:3, s. 237-245
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To assess the ability of a conventional density mask method to detect mild emphysema by high- resolution computed tomography ( HRCT), to analyze factors influencing quantification of mild emphysema, and to validate a new algorithm for detection of mild emphysema. Material and Methods: Fifty- five healthy male smokers and 34 never- smokers, 61 - 62 years of age, were examined. Emphysema was evaluated visually, by the conventional density mask method, and by a new algorithm compensating for the effects of gravity and artifacts due to motion and the reconstruction algorithm. Effects of the reconstruction algorithm, slice thickness, and various threshold levels on the outcome of the density mask area were evaluated. Results: Forty- nine percent of the smokers had mild emphysema. The density mask area was higher the thinner the slice irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm and threshold level. The sharp algorithm resulted in increased density mask area. The new reconstruction algorithm could discriminate between smokers with and those without mild emphysema, whereas the density mask method could not. The diagnostic ability of the new algorithm was dependent on lung level. At about 90% specificity, sensitivity was 65 - 100% in the apical levels, but low in the rest of the lung. Conclusion: The conventional density mask method is inadequate for detecting mild emphysema, while the new algorithm improves the diagnostic ability but is nevertheless still imperfect.
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
- Zachrisson, Sara, et al.
(author)
-
Effect of clinical experience of chest tomosynthesis on detection of pulmonary nodules.
- 2009
-
In: Acta radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 1600-0455 .- 0284-1851. ; 50:8, s. 884-891
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The new technique chest tomosynthesis refers to the principle of collecting low-dose projections of the chest at different angles and using these projections to reconstruct section images of the chest at a radiation dose comparable to that of chest radiography. PURPOSE: To investigate if, for experienced thoracic radiologists, the detectability of pulmonary nodules obtained after only a short initial learning period of chest tomosynthesis improves with additional clinical experience of the new technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two readings of the same clinical chest tomosynthesis cases, the first performed after 6 months of clinical experience and the second after an additional period of 1 year, were conducted. Three senior thoracic radiologists, with more than 20 years of experience of chest radiography, acted as observers, with the task of detecting pulmonary nodules in a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC1) study. The image material consisted of 42 patients with and 47 patients without pulmonary nodules examined with chest tomosynthesis. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as a reference. The total number of nodules was 131. The JAFROC1 figure of merit (FOM) was used as the principal measure of detectability. RESULTS: The difference in the observer-averaged JAFROC1 FOM of the two readings was 0.004 (95% confidence interval: -0.11, 0.12; F-statistic: 0.01 on 1 and 2.65 df; P=0.91). Thus, no significant improvement in detectability was found after the additional clinical experience of tomosynthesis. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that experienced thoracic radiologists already within the first months of clinical use of chest tomosynthesis are able to take advantage of the new technique in the task of detecting pulmonary nodules.
|
|
10. |
|
|