| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Belch, Jill J. F., et al.
(author)
-
Results of the randomized, placebo-controlled clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in bypass surgery for peripheral arterial disease (CASPAR) trial
- 2010
-
In: Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. - : Elsevier BV. - 0741-5214. ; 52:4, s. 825-833, 833.e1-2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The combination of clopidogrel plus ASA did not improve limb or systemic outcomes in the overall population of PAD patients requiring below-knee bypass grafting. Subgroup analysis suggests that clopidogrel plus ASA confers benefit in patients receiving prosthetic grafts without significantly increasing major bleeding risk.
|
|
| 3. |
- Dahl, O. E., et al.
(author)
-
A critical appraisal of bleeding events reported in venous thromboembolism prevention trials of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty
- 2010
-
In: Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. - : Elsevier BV. - 1538-7933 .- 1538-7836. ; 8:9, s. 1966-1975
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Summary Background: Anticoagulants are effective for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but cause bleeding. Interpretation of the risks and benefits of new anticoagulant regimens for VTE prevention is complicated by a lack of standardized definitions and reporting of bleeding. We reviewed the reporting of bleeding in randomized controlled trials of new anticoagulants compared with standard doses of enoxaparin in hip and knee arthroplasty, and examined the possible impact of differences in the definition of major bleeding on interpretation of the trial results. Methods: Electronic searches identified 16 phase III trials published between 2001 and 2010 involving 41,265 patients comparing one of 5 new anticoagulants with a common comparator, enoxaparin. Results: Major bleeding rates in patients treated with enoxaparin ranged from 0.1% to 3.1% in hip arthroplasty trials and from 0.2% to 1.4% in knee arthroplasty trials. In studies that excluded surgical-site bleeding from the definition, major bleeding rates were about 10-fold lower than in those which included surgical-site bleeding. Within the individual trials, the choice of bleeding definition and the methods of assessment of bleeding influenced the conclusions regarding the risk of bleeding with new anticoagulant regimens relative to enoxaparin. Eight of the 16 studies demonstrated a >/=40% relative risk differences in major bleeding between treatment groups but the difference was statistically significant in only two of these trials. Conclusion: Randomized VTE prevention trials report markedly different rates of major bleeding despite similar patient populations and doses and durations of anticoagulant prophylaxis and were underpowered to detect modest differences in patient-important bleeding events. Standardization of bleeding definitions and reporting seems desirable.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Van Spall, H G, et al.
(author)
-
Variation in warfarin dose adjustment practice is responsible for differences in the quality of anticoagulation control between centers and countries: an analysis of patients receiving warfarin in the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) trial
- 2012
-
In: Circulation. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 126:19, s. 2309-2316
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The outcome of atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin partially depends on maintaining adequate time in therapeutic International Normalized Ratio range (TTR). Large differences in TTR have been reported between centers and countries. The association between warfarin dosing practice, TTR, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial patients receiving warfarin. METHODS AND RESULTS: RE-LY provided an algorithm for warfarin dosing, recommending no change for in-range, and 10% to 15% weekly dose changes for out-of-range International Normalized Ratio values. We determined whether dose adjustments were consistent with algorithm recommendations but could not verify whether providers used the algorithm. Using multilevel regression models to adjust for patient, center, and country characteristics, we assessed whether algorithm-consistent warfarin dosing could predict patient TTR and the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, or major hemorrhage. We included 6022 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients from 912 centers in 44 countries. We found a strong association between the proportion of algorithm-consistent warfarin doses and mean country TTR (R(2)=0.65). The degree of algorithm-consistency accounted for 87% of the between-center and 55% of the between-country TTR variation. Each 10% increase in center algorithm-consistent dosing independently predicted a 6.12% increase in TTR (95% confidence interval, 5.65-6.59) and an 8% decrease in rate of the composite clinical outcome (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence, intentional or not, to a simple warfarin dosing algorithm predicts improved TTR and accounts for considerable TTR variation between centers and countries. Systems facilitating algorithm-based warfarin dosing could optimize anticoagulation quality and improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation on a global scale. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.
|
|
| 6. |
- Dans, Antonio L, et al.
(author)
-
Concomitant Use of Antiplatelet Therapy with Dabigatran or Warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY®) Trial
- 2013
-
In: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 127:5, s. 634-640
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND:RE-LY showed that dabigatran etexilate 150 mg bid (DE150) was superior, and 110 mg bid (DE110) non-inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this subgroup analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in patients who did and didn't receive concomitant antiplatelets METHODS AND RESULTS: All comparisons used a cox proportional hazards model with adjustments made for risk factors for bleeding. A time dependent analysis was performed when comparing patients with concomitant antiplatelets to those without. 6952 of 18,113 patients (38.4%) received concomitant ASA or clopidogrel at some time during the study. DE110 was non-inferior to warfarin in reducing SSE, whether patients received antiplatelets (HR=0.93; 95%CI: 0.70-1.25) or not (HR=0.87; 95%CI: 0.66-1.15; interaction p=0.738). There were less major bleeds than warfarin in both subgroups (HR=0.82; 95%CI: 0.67-1.00 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96 for patients who didn't; interaction p=0.794). DE 150 reduced the primary outcome of SSE compared to warfarin. This effect seemed attenuated among patients who used antiplatelets (HR=0.80, 95%CI: 0.59-1.08) compared to those who didn't (HR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.38-0.72; p for interaction=0.058). Major bleeding was similar to warfarin regardless of antiplatelet use (HR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.76-1.12 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.78-1.15 for patients who didn't; p for interaction=0.875). In the time dependent analysis, concomitant use of a single antiplatelet seemed to increase the risk of major bleeding (HR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.42, 1.82). Dual antiplatelet seemed to increased this even more (HR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.79, 2.98). The absolute risks were lowest on DE110 compared to DE150 or warfarin.CONCLUSIONS:Concomitant antiplatelet drugs appeared to increase the risk for major bleeding in RE-LY without affecting the advantages of dabigatran over warfarin. Choosing between DE110 and DE150 requires a careful assessment of characteristics that influence the balance between benefit and harm.
|
|
| 7. |
- Eikelboom, John W., et al.
(author)
-
Balancing the Benefits and Risks of 2 Doses of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation
- 2013
-
In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 62:10, s. 900-908
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives This study sought to compare the net clinical benefit of dabigatran 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid with that of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Background In patients with AF, dabigatran 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid are associated with similar rates of death. However, the higher dose reduces ischemic stroke and increases bleeding compared with the lower dose. Therefore, there is uncertainty about how to evaluate the overall benefit of the 2 doses. Methods In 18,113 AF patients in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy) trial, we used a previously developed method for integrating ischemic and bleeding events as "ischemic stroke equivalents" in order to compare a weighted benefit of 2 doses of dabigatran with each other, and with that of warfarin. Results Compared with warfarin, there was a significant decrease in ischemic stroke equivalents with both dabigatran doses: -0.92 per 100 patient years (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.74 to -0.21, p = 0.02) with dabigatran 110 mg bid and -1.08 (95% CI: -1.86 to -0.34, p = 0.01) with dabigatran 150 mg bid. There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke equivalents between the 2 doses: -0.16 (95% CI: -0.80 to 0.43) comparing dabigatran 150 mg bid with 110 bid. When including death in the weighted benefit calculations, the results were similar. Conclusions On a group level both doses of dabigatran as compared with warfarin have similar benefits when considering a weighted estimate including both efficacy and safety. The similar overall benefits of the 2 doses of dabigatran versus warfarin support individualizing the dose based on patient characteristics and physician and patient preferences. (Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy [RE-LY] With Dabigatran Etexilate; NCT00262600)
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Eikelboom, John W., et al.
(author)
-
Risk of Bleeding With 2 Doses of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Older and Younger Patients With Atrial Fibrillation An Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial
- 2011
-
In: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 123:21, s. 2363-2372
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background-Dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice a day and warfarin are effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare their risks of bleeding in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial. Methods and Results-The RE-LY trial randomized 18 113 patients to receive dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice a day or warfarin dose adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg twice a day was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (2.87% versus 3.57%; P=0.002), whereas dabigatran 150 mg twice a day was associated with a similar risk of major bleeding (3.31% versus 3.57%; P=0.32). There was a significant treatment-by-age interaction, such that dabigatran 110 mg twice a day compared with warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding in patients aged = 75 years (4.43% versus 4.37%; P=0.89; P for interaction = 75 years (5.10% versus 4.37%; P=0.07; P for interaction = 75 years, intracranial bleeding risk is lower but extracranial bleeding risk is similar or higher with both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin.
|
|
| 10. |
- Hijazi, Ziad, et al.
(author)
-
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Relation to Baseline Renal Function in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation A RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) Trial Analysis
- 2014
-
In: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 129:9, s. 961-970
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Renal impairment increases the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RELY) trial, dabigatran, with approximate to 80% renal elimination, displayed superiority over warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the 150-mg dose and significantly less major bleeding in the 110-mg dose in 18 113 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This prespecified study investigated these outcomes in relation to renal function. Methods and Results Glomerular filtration rate was estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations in all randomized patients with available creatinine at baseline (n=17 951), and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate was estimated in a subpopulation with measurements available (n=6190). A glomerular filtration rate 80, 50 to <80, and <50 mL/min was estimated in 32.6%, 47.6%, and 19.8% and in 21.6%, 59.6%, and 18.8% of patients based on Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI, respectively. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality increased as renal function decreased. The rates of stroke or systemic embolism were lower with dabigatran 150 mg and similar with 110 mg twice daily compared with warfarin, without significant heterogeneity in subgroups defined by renal function (interaction P>0.1 for all). For the outcome of major bleeding, there were significant interactions between treatment and renal function according to CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, respectively (P<0.05). The relative reduction in major bleeding with either dabigatran dose compared with warfarin was greater in patients with glomerular filtration rate 80 mL/min. Conclusions The efficacy of both dosages of dabigatran was consistent with the overall trial irrespective of renal function. However, with the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, both dabigatran dosages displayed significantly lower rates of major bleeding in patients with glomerular filtration rate 80 mL/min. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.
|
|
