| 1. |
- Longo, C., et al.
(author)
-
Delphi Consensus Among International Experts on the Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Lentigo Maligna
- 2023
-
In: Dermatology Practical & Conceptual. - 2160-9381. ; 13:3
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction: Melanoma of the lentigo maligna (LM) type is challenging. There is lack of consensus on the optimal diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Objectives: To obtain general consensus on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for LM. Methods: A modified Delphi method was used. The invited participants were either members of the International Dermoscopy Society, academic experts, or authors of published articles relating to skin cancer and melanoma. Participants were required to respond across three rounds using a 4-point Likert scale). Consensus was defined as >75% of participants agreeing/strongly agreeing or disagreeing/strongly disagreeing. Results: Of the 31 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 29 participants completed Round 1 (89.9% response rate), 25/31 completed Round 2 (77.5% response rate), and 25/31 completed Round 3 (77.5% response rate). Experts agreed that LM diagnosis should be based on a clinical and dermatoscopic approach (92%) followed by a biopsy. The most appropriate primary treatment of LM was deemed to be margin-controlled surgery (83.3%), although non-surgical modalities, especially imiquimod, were commonly used either as alternative off-label primary treatment in selected patients or as adjuvant therapy following surgery; 62% participants responded life-long clinical follow-up was needed for LM. Conclusions: Clinical and histological diagnosis of LM is challenging and should be based on macroscopic, dermatoscopic, and RCM examination followed by a biopsy. Different treatment modalities and follow-up should be carefully discussed with the patient.
|
|
| 2. |
- Pham, James P., et al.
(author)
-
Full-body skin examination in screening for cutaneous malignancy: A focus on concealed sites and the practices of international dermatologists
- 2024
-
In: JEADV CLINICAL PRACTICE. - 2768-6566. ; 3:4, s. 1132-1139
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundFull-body skin examination (FSE) is fundamental to the diagnosis of cutaneous malignancy but may not always include concealed site examination (CSE).ObjectivesTo determine the approach of international dermatologists to CSE during FSE and examine influencing factors, barriers and attitudes toward CSE.MethodsMembers of the International Dermoscopy Society were surveyed using an online 12-question survey disseminated via email.ResultsThere were 706 completed responses among 1249 unique clicks to the survey, representing a completion rate of 56.5%. Fifty-four percent of respondents reported always examining the breasts, while 52.8%, 18.8%, and 11.8% always examined the scalp, oral, and anogenital mucosa, respectively. The most frequent reason for examining concealed sites was patient concern, whilst common reasons for not examining concealed sites included low incidence of pathology and concern regarding allegations of sexual misconduct.ConclusionsOur findings allude to the need for international consensus guidelines regarding the conduct and inclusion of concealed or sensitive sites in routine FSE. This is essential to define clinician responsibilities, inform patient expectations of care, and thereby mitigate potential medicolegal repercussions.
|
|
