1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Håkansson, Bo, 1953, et al.
(author)
-
An implantable bone conduction hearing aid
- 2000
-
In: 3rd International Congress on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
- Priwin, Claudia, 1971, et al.
(author)
-
Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation
- 2004
-
In: Laryngoscope. - : Laryngoscope. - 0023-852X .- 1531-4995. ; 114:1, s. 77-84
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: Since the technique to implant bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) with the use of osseointegrated implants was developed in 1977, more than 15,000 patients have been fitted with BAHAs worldwide. Although the majority have bilateral hearing loss, they are primarily fitted unilaterally. The main objective of this study was to reveal benefits and drawbacks of bilateral fitting of BAHAs in patients with symmetric or slight asymmetric bone-conduction thresholds. The possible effects were divided into three categories: hearing thresholds, directional hearing, and binaural hearing. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of 12 patients with bilateral BAHAs. METHODS: Baseline audiometry, directional hearing, speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise, and binaural masking level difference were tested when BAHAs were fitted unilaterally and bilaterally. RESULTS: Eleven of the 12 patients used bilateral BAHAs on a daily basis. Tests performed in the study show a significant improvement in sound localization with bilateral BAHAs; the results with unilateral fitting were close to the chance level. Furthermore, with bilateral application, the improvement of the speech reception threshold in quiet was 5.4 dB. An improvement with bilateral fitting was also found for speech reception in noise. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results with bilateral fitted BAHAs were better than with unilaterally fitted BAHA; the benefit is not only caused simply by bilateral stimulation but also, to some extent, by binaural hearing. Bilateral BAHAs should be considered for patients with bilateral hearing loss otherwise suitable for BAHAs.
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
- Stenfelt, Stefan, 1969, et al.
(author)
-
A bone-anchored hearing aid for patients with pure sensorineural hearing impairment: a pilot study.
- 2000
-
In: Scandinavian audiology. - : TAYLOR and FRANCIS AS. - 0105-0397 .- 1940-2872. ; 29:3, s. 175-85
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This pilot study assesses the potential benefits of an optimized bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) for patients with a mild to moderate pure sensorineural high frequency hearing impairment. The evaluation was conducted with eight first-time hearing aid users by means of psycho-acoustic sound field measurements and a questionnaire on subjective experience; all of the patients benefited from the BAHA. On average, the eight patients showed improvement in PTA threshold of 3.4 dB and in speech intelligibility in noise of 14%. Seven of the subjects, also fitted with present standard air conduction hearing aids (ACHA) found the ACHA thresholds to be improved more than the BAHA ones. In speech tests, the ACHA was only slightly better; these patients chose between their different hearing aids according to the sound environment. Although the BAHA was preferred for wearing and sound comfort, it cannot be used as the sole aid for patients with pure sensorineural impairment.
|
|
10. |
|
|