| 1. |
- Havstam, Christina, 1963, et al.
(author)
-
Evaluation of VPI-assessment with videofluoroscopy and nasoendoscopy.
- 2005
-
In: British journal of plastic surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0007-1226. ; 58:7, s. 922-31
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The purpose of this study was to investigate how different amounts of visual assessment information influence the recommended treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Is a patient presented with videofluoroscopy (VF) in lateral projection recommended the same treatment as when frontal projection, nasoendoscopy, or both, are added? Retrospective material with video recorded assessment of VPI was blinded and copied in random order. Each patient was then presented in four separate combinations: VF in lateral projection; VF in lateral and frontal projection; VF in lateral projection and nasoendoscopy; and VF in lateral and frontal projection and nasoendoscopy (all of the available assessment material). The cleft palate team of Göteborg, Sweden, mutually rated velopharyngeal function and recommended action based on the presented material. SUBJECTS: Nineteen consecutive patients (median age 7:5 years, range 4:4-19:7) investigated with VF in lateral and frontal projection and nasoendoscopy during 1997-99 at the cleft palate centre in Göteborg, Sweden. Post operative assessments were excluded. Percent agreement and Kappa calculations were used to compare the different combinations of parts of information to all of the available information. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 19 patients (68%) were recommended the same action regardless of the amount of presented information. Percent agreement (Kappa) between parts and all of the available information: VF in lateral projection 84% (0.75), VF in lateral and frontal projection 79% (0.74), and VF in lateral projection and nasoendoscopy 84% (0.72). CONCLUSIONS: VF in lateral projection is recommended to be the first step in visualising velopharyngeal function, and nasoendoscopy the next when further investigation is required.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Havstam, Christina, 1963, et al.
(author)
-
Speech and satisfaction with outcome of treatment in young adults with unilateral or bilateral complete clefts.
- 2008
-
In: Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery / Nordisk plastikkirurgisk forening [and] Nordisk klubb for handkirurgi. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0284-4311. ; 42:4, s. 182-9
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Thirty-five young adults (22-32 years old, mean 25) born with complete unilateral or bilateral clefts participated in a follow-up of speech, appearance, and teeth after treatment. They completed a questionnaire about their satisfaction with their speech, nose, lip, and teeth on visual analogue scales, and indicated on two overall questions how often they thought about their cleft, and how often they were asked questions about their speech, nose, or lip. Their speech was recorded and assessed blindly and independently by two speech and language pathologists. Participants' satisfaction with their speech did not correlate significantly with the speech assessments. Satisfaction with the nose had the highest correlation with the overall questions. No participant indicated more dissatisfaction with speech than the midpoint of the scale, making conclusions about covariance between satisfaction with speech and the overall questions difficult.
|
|
| 4. |
- Johannisson, Tove B, et al.
(author)
-
The Communication Attitude Test (CAT-S): normative values for 220 Swedish children.
- 2009
-
In: International journal of language & communication disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. - : Wiley. - 1460-6984 .- 1368-2822. ; 44:6, s. 813-25
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The risk of developing a negative attitude to communication as a consequence of having a speech disorder has been in focus for decades in research concerning fluency disorders in relation to both children and adults. The Communication Attitude Test (CAT), which was created to measure children's attitudes towards their own communication, has been widely used. Research has shown that children who stutter have a significantly more negative attitude to their own communication than normal-speaking children and preliminary results show a similar picture in children with other types of speech disorders. However, the setting for obtaining data on normal-speaking children often differs from that on children with speech disorders. In order to make a significant interpretation of results from children with a speech disorder, comparable data on normal-speaking children are needed. Aims: The main purpose of this study was to obtain norm values for the Swedish version of the test (CAT-S) and examine possible differences related to age, sex or small town/big city. A second aim was to investigate some aspects of reliability, such as internal consistency, and validity in terms of item analysis as well as a qualitative analysis of the answers to the different items. In addition, group setting was compared with individual setting for the test procedure. Methods & Procedures: CAT-S was completed in a group setting by 220 normal-speaking children aged 7-15 years and by an additional group of 35 normal-speaking 10-year-old children who completed the test individually. Outcomes & Results: The 220 Swedish children had a mean score of 6.05 (a slightly higher mean score have been found in other countries, i.e. Belgium = 7.05 and USA = 8.24). The 7-year-olds had a significantly higher mean score than children at the other ages, except for the 15-year-olds. No other differences were found related to age, sex or size of community. The aspects of reliability and validity investigated for the CAT-S were satisfactory. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups of 10-year-olds objected to different test procedures. Conclusions & Implications: The norm values of CAT-S could be used for comparison of scores from Swedish children with speech disorders. The CAT-S is easy to administer and could be used either in a group setting for research purpose or individually at the clinic.
|
|
