| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Brockstedt, Sara, et al.
(author)
-
BE AWARE OF NEUTRONS OUTSIDE SHORT MAZES FROM 10-MV LINEAR ACCELERATORS X-RAYS IN RADIOTHERAPY FACILITIES.
- 2015
-
In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1742-3406 .- 0144-8420. ; 165:1-4, s. 464-467
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- During the radiation survey of a reinstalled 10-MV linear accelerator in an old radiation treatment facility, high dose rates of neutrons were observed. The area outside the maze entrance is used as a waiting room where patients, their relatives and staff other than those involved in the actual treatment can freely pass. High fluence rates of neutrons would cause an unnecessary high effective dose to the staff working in the vicinity of such a system, and it can be several orders higher than the doses received due to X-rays at the same location. However, the common knowledge appears to have been that the effect of neutrons at 10-MV X-ray linear accelerator facilities is negligible and shielding calculations models seldom mention neutrons for this operating energy level. Although data are scarce, reports regarding this phenomenon are now emerging. For the future, it is advocated that contributions from neutrons are considered already during the planning stage of new or modified facilities aimed for 10 MV and that estimated dose levels are verified.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Knöös, Tommy
(author)
-
QA procedures needed for advanced RT techniques and its impact on treatment outcome
- 2015
-
In: 8th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry (IC3DDOSE). - : IOP Publishing. - 1742-6596 .- 1742-6588. ; 573, s. 012001-012001
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The radiotherapy process is reviewed briefly and potential risks or pitfalls are identified. The focus is on modern advanced modalities in radiation therapy such as IMRT, VMAT, gating and tracking and also for the unknown to come. Existing methods, or quality controls (QC), or with better word barriers, are introduced at important steps of process with the purpose of prohibiting errors to continue through the process and thus avoiding an unwanted erroneous irradiation of the patient. The soft branch of quality assurance (QA) such as peer-review is also a major component of today's process and its safety. The importance of knowing your QCs is pointed out. The role of dosimetry method i.e. 3D-dosimetry is reviewed. Staff have to be working with awareness and alertness that can reduce most of the risks. Having comprehensive protocols known by all involved together with well-trained staff at the department with dedicated functions and responsibilities will further reduce the risk for unintended irradiations of patient. Having a well-designed QA system with the appropriate barriers have the possibility of producing high quality radiotherapy, which will also result in better outcome for the patients. The international head and neck trial illustrates very well the importance of accurate radiotherapy.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kristensen, Ingrid, et al.
(author)
-
A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation
- 2017
-
In: Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 2405-6324. ; 3-4, s. 41-47
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background and purpose: Substantial inter-observer variations in target delineation have been presented previously. Target delineation for paediatric cases is difficult due to the small number of children, the variation in paediatric targets, the number of study protocols, and the individual patient's specific needs and demands. Uncertainties in target delineation might lead to under-dosage or over-dosage. The aim of this work is to apply the concept of a consensus volume and good quality treatment plans to visualise and quantify inter-observer target delineation variations in dosimetric terms in addition to conventional geometrically based volume concordance indices.Material and methods: Two paediatric cases were used to demonstrate the potential of adding dose metrics when evaluating target delineation diversity; Hodgkin's disease (case 1) and rhabdomyosarcoma of the parotid gland (case 2). The variability in target delineation (PTV delineations) between six centres was quantified using the generalised conformity index, CIgen, generated for volume overlap. The STAPLE algorithm, as implemented in CERR, was used for both cases to derive a consensus volumes. STAPLE is a probabilistic estimate of the true volume generated from all observers. Dose distributions created by each centre for the original target volumes were then applied to this consensus volume.Results: A considerable variation in target segmentation was seen in both cases. For case 1 the variation was 374-960 cm3 (average 669 cm3) and for case 2; 65-126 cm3 (average 109 cm3). CIgen were 0.53 and 0.70, respectively. The DVHs in absolute volume displayed for the delineated target volume as well as for the consensus volume adds information on both ''compliant" target volumes as well as outliers which are hidden with just the use of concordance indices.Conclusions: The DVHs in absolute volume add valuable and easily understood information to various indices for evaluating uniformity in target delineation.
|
|
| 6. |
- Lempart, Michael, et al.
(author)
-
Modifying a clinical linear accelerator for delivery of ultra-high dose rate irradiation
- 2019
-
In: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-8140. ; 139, s. 40-45
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives: The purpose of this study was to modify a clinical linear accelerator, making it capable of electron beam ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation. Modifications had to be quick, reversible, and without interfering with clinical treatments. Methods: Performed modifications: (1) reduced distance with three setup positions, (2) adjusted/optimized gun current, modulator charge rate and beam steering values for a high dose rate, (3) delivery was controlled with a microcontroller on an electron pulse level, and (4) moving the primary and/or secondary scattering foils from the beam path. Results: The variation in dose for a five-pulse delivery was measured to be 1% (using a diode, 4% using film) during 10 minutes after a warm-up procedure, later increasing to 7% (11% using film). A FLASH irradiation dose rate was reached at the cross-hair foil, MLC, and wedge position, with ≥30, ≥80, and ≥300 Gy/s, respectively. Moving the scattering foils resulted in an increased output of ≥120, ≥250, and ≥1000 Gy/s, at the three positions. The beam flatness was 5% at the cross-hair position for a 20 × 20 and a 10 × 10 cm2 area, with and without both scattering foils in the beam. The beam flatness was 10% at the wedge position for a 6 and 2.5 cm diametric area, with and without the scattering foils in the beam path. Conclusions: A clinical accelerator was modified to produce ultra-high dose rates, high enough for FLASH irradiation. Future work aims to fine-tune the dose delivery, using the on-board transmission chamber signal and adjusting the dose-per-pulse.
|
|
| 7. |
- Movahed, Allen, et al.
(author)
-
International multi-institutional bench mark study on dosimetric and volumetric modulation using helical tomotherapy treatment planning for malignant pleural mesothelioma tumors
- 2015
-
In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 2015. - Cham : Springer International Publishing. - 9783319193861 - 9783319193878 ; 51, s. 381-383
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Determining the most desirable and achievable target dose and organ at risk (OAR) sparing using helical TomoTherapy planning system for mesothelioma treatment plans. A range of planning parameters was used. The reviewers’ ranking assessment (Ranking in Groups: 1 = Good, 2 = Above Average, 3 = Average, 4 = Poor).The overall rankings revealed that a plan with a balanced tradeoff among all planning objectives was preferred by most participants and reviewers. Other studies found low doses to the contralateral lung to be limiting. This was not the case in our study, with TomoTherapy we found the dose to contra lateral lung to be as low as V5Gy=0.87%. A pitch value of 0.287 or 0.43 would provide better result. A delivered modulation factor of above 1.7 and a treatment time around 500 sec will be beneficial consideration in planning.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
