1. |
- Ardern, Clare, et al.
(author)
-
A psychological support intervention to help injured athletes "get back in the game" : Design and development study
- 2022
-
In: JMIR Formative Research. - : JMIR Publications Inc.. - 2561-326X. ; 6:8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: After a serious knee injury, up to half of athletes do not return to competitive sport, despite recovering sufficient physical function. Athletes often desire psychological support for the return to sport, but rehabilitation clinicians feel ill-equipped to deliver adequate support.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to design and develop an internet-delivered psychological support program for athletes recovering from knee ligament surgery.METHODS: Our work for developing and designing the Back in the Game intervention was guided by a blend of theory-, evidence-, and target population-based strategies for developing complex interventions. We systematically searched for qualitative evidence related to athletes' experiences with, perspectives on, and needs for recovery and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Two reviewers coded and synthesized the results via thematic meta-synthesis. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials reporting on psychological support interventions for improving ACL rehabilitation outcomes in athletes. One reviewer extracted the data, including effect estimates; a second reviewer checked the data for accuracy. The results were synthesized descriptively. We conducted feasibility testing in two phases-(1) technical assessment and (2) feasibility and usability testing. For phase 1, we recruited clinicians and people with lived experience of ACL injury. For phase 2, we recruited patients aged between 15 and 30 years who were within 8 weeks of ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants completed a 10-week version of the intervention and semistructured interviews for evaluating acceptability, demand, practicality, and integration. This project was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (approval number: 2018/45-31).RESULTS: The following three analytic themes emerged from the meta-synthesis (studies: n=16; participants: n=164): (1) tools or strategies for supporting rehabilitation progress, (2) barriers and facilitators for the physical readiness to return to sport, and (3) barriers and facilitators for the psychological readiness to return to sport. Coping strategies, relaxation, and goal setting may have a positive effect on rehabilitation outcomes after ACL reconstruction (randomized controlled trials: n=7; participants: n=430). There were no trials of psychological support interventions for improving the return to sport. Eleven people completed phase 1 of feasibility testing (technical assessment) and identified 4 types of software errors, which we fixed. Six participants completed the feasibility and usability testing phase. Their feedback suggested that the intervention was easy to access and addressed the needs of athletes who want to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. We refined the intervention to include more multimedia content and support access to and the use of the intervention features.CONCLUSIONS: The Back in the Game intervention is a 24-week, internet-delivered, self-guided program that comprises 7 modules that complement usual rehabilitation, changes focus as rehabilitation progresses, is easy to access and use, and includes different psychological support strategies.
|
|
2. |
- Ardern, Clare, et al.
(author)
-
BAck iN the Game (BANG) - a smartphone application to help athletes return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial
- 2020
-
In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : BMC. - 1471-2474. ; 21:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Sustaining injury is a common consequence of playing sport. At least one in every three recreational athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction do not return to their preinjury sport following treatment. Psychological factors including confidence and fear of new injury exert large effects on returning to sport. The primary aim of this trial is to test whether a custom smartphone application delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy is effective for improving the number of people who return to their preinjury sport and level following ACL reconstruction. Methods: Participants scheduled for primary ACL reconstruction are recruited prior to surgery from one of six trial sites in Sweden. We aim to recruit 222 participants (111 in each group) for the BANG trial. Participants are randomly allocated to receive either usual rehabilitation care alone or usual rehabilitation care plus the Back in the Game smartphone application intervention. Back in the Game is a 24-week Internet-delivered programme, based on cognitive-behavioural therapy. The primary outcome is return to the preinjury sport and level at 12 months follow-up. The secondary outcomes assess physical activity participation, new knee injuries, psychological factors, quality of life and physical function. Physical activity participation and new injuries are self-reported every two weeks for 12 months, then every 4 weeks to 24 months follow-up. Psychological readiness to return to sport, knee self-efficacy, motivation to participate in leisure time physical activity, knee-related quality of life, and self-reported knee function are also assessed at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months after surgery. A clinical assessment of strength, knee range of motion, effusion and hopping performance is completed by a blinded assessor at 12 months to assess physical function. Discussion: This protocol outlines how we plan to assess the efficacy of a custom smartphone application, delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy to address fear, confidence and recovery expectations, for improving return to sport following serious sports-related musculoskeletal injury. The BANG trial employs a pragmatic design to best reflect the reality of, and inform, clinical practice.
|
|
3. |
- Arundale, Amelia, et al.
(author)
-
Jump performance in male and female football players
- 2020
-
In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. - : SPRINGER. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 28, s. 606-613
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose To examine differences between men and women football players in clinically feasible jumping measures. Methods Female football players (N=46, ages 16-25) were matched based on age, training frequency, and playing position with 46 male players. All players performed the tuck jump and drop vertical jump (DVJ). DVJ was assessed quantitatively for valgus knee motion and probability of a high peak knee abduction moment (pKAM), as well as sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles, and qualitatively with visual assessment of the players knees upon landing; graded as good, reduced, or poor control. Result Women had higher total tuck jump scores (52) (more technique flaws), than men (3 +/- 2, Pamp;lt;0.01). The quantitative analysis of the DVJ found that men had greater asymmetries between limbs, but women landed bilaterally in more knee valgus (interaction P=0.04, main effect of sex P=0.02). There was no difference in pKAM (interaction n.s.). Women also landed in less hip flexion (P=0.01) and ankle dorsiflexion (P=0.01) than men. The qualitative DVJ analysis found that more women (48%) had poor knee control compared to men (11%, Pamp;lt;0.01). Conclusions The results indicate that women perform worse on the tuck jump assessment than men. The results support previous findings that women land in more knee valgus than men, but also found that men may have larger asymmetries in knee valgus. These results from clinically feasible measures provide some suggestions for clinicians to consider during ACL reconstruction rehabilitation to enhance performance.
|
|
4. |
- Arundale, Amelia, et al.
(author)
-
TUCK JUMP SCORE IS NOT RELATED TO HOPPING PERFORMANCE OR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN FEMALE SOCCER PLAYERS
- 2020
-
In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY. - : AMER PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOC. - 2159-2896. ; 15:3, s. 395-406
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The tuck jump assessment was developed to identify players at risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries or gauge a players progress through rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. A tuck jump score of >= 6 out of 10 has been labeled poor and thought to identify players with high risk landing patterns. Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine if there was a relationship between tuck jump score, particularly tuck jump scores >= 6, hopping performance, and patient-reported outcome measures in female soccer players with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and knee-healthy controls. Study Design: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study Methods: Female soccer players (117 after ACLR, 117 knee-healthy) performed the single hop for distance, tuck jump assessment, and drop vertical jump (DVJ). All players were categorized based on as having a total tuck jump score >= 6 or < 6. Analyzing all players together, Spearmans rank correlations assessed if there were relationships between total tuck jump score or tuck jump scores >= 6 and single-legged hop limb symmetry or DVJ measures. Players with an ACLR also filled out the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Spearmans rank correlations assessed if there were relationships between total tuck jump score or tuck jump scores >= 6 and patient-reported outcome measures. Results: The mean tuck jump scores was 4.8 +/- 1.8 (tuck jump score >= 6, 6.7 +/- 0.9, tuck jump score < 6, 3.7 +/- 1.1) with 87 (37%) athletes having tuck jump score >= 6. There were no significant relationships between tuck jump score or tuck jump score >= 6 and hopping performance or patient-reported outcome measures. Conclusion: The results of this current study indicate that tuck jump scores, including tuck jump scores >= 6, may not be related to functional or patient-reported outcome measures. Further work is needed to examine the clinical utility of the tuck jump assessment.
|
|
5. |
- Bueneman, Sofia Lindqvist, et al.
(author)
-
Analysis of the Swedish Knee Ligament Register: Concomitant injuries, revision surgery and smoking render worse results
- 2024
-
In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. - : SPRINGER. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PurposeTo analyse the 52,199 patients in the Swedish Knee Ligament Register (SKLR) preoperatively, and the patients reaching 5- and 10-year follow-ups who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), revision ACLR and ACLR on the contralateral side (CACLR). The main hypothesis was that patients undergoing revision ACLR would have worse patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) than the primary ACLR group at 10 years and that smoking and concomitant injuries would result in poorer outcomes for all groups. MethodsData from 2005 to 2021 were extracted from the SKLR. Only patients whose ACLR surgery was registered in the SKLR were included for revision ACLR and CACLR. The PROMs consist of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the knee-specific PROM (EQ-5D-3L). PROMs were analysed as a whole and in subgroups based on sex, smoking, graft choice and concomitant injuries. ResultsPoorer KOOS were seen for revisions compared with primary ACLRs at both the 5- and 10-year follow-ups (p = 0.003). Smokers had significantly poorer KOOS than nonsmokers (p < 0.001) preoperatively in all groups, however only in the primary ACLR group at 5 and 10 years. At 10 years, patients who had undergone CACLR had lower KOOS than primary ACLRs (p = 0.03). Concomitant injuries resulted in statistically, significantly poorer KOOS for both primary ACLRs and CACLRs preoperatively and at the follow-ups. ConclusionThe PROMs for revision ACLRs have worse KOOS scores at 10 years compared with the primary ACLRs. The presence of concomitant meniscal or cartilage injuries at the time of ACLR or CACLR were associated with worse PROMs. Level of EvidenceLevel III.
|
|
6. |
- Bullock, Garrett S., et al.
(author)
-
Kinesiophobia, Knee Self-Efficacy, and Fear Avoidance Beliefs in People with ACL Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2022
-
In: Sports Medicine. - : ADIS INT LTD. - 0112-1642 .- 1179-2035. ; 52, s. 3001-3019
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background To improve the understanding of the psychological impacts of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, a systematic review synthesizing the evidence on knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury is needed. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to investigate knee self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia following ACL injury, and compare these outcomes following management with rehabilitation alone, early and delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Methods Seven databases were searched from inception to April 14, 2022. Articles were included if they assessed Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (KSES), or Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using domain-based RoB tools (ROBINS-1, RoB 2, RoBANS), and GRADE-assessed certainty of evidence. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled outcomes, stratified by time post-injury (pre-operative, 3-6 months, 7-12 months, > 1-2 years, > 2-5 years, > 5 years). Results Seventy-three studies (70% high RoB) were included (study outcomes: TSK: 55; KSES: 22; FABQ: 5). Meta-analysis demonstrated worse kinesiophobia and self-efficacy pre-operatively (pooled mean [95% CI], TSK-11: 23.8 [22.2-25.3]; KSES: 5.0 [4.4-5.5]) compared with 3-6 months following ACLR (TSK-11: 19.6 [18.7-20.6]; KSES: 19.6 [18.6-20.6]). Meta-analysis suggests similar kinesiophobia > 3-6 months following early ACLR (19.8 [4.9]) versus delayed ACLR (17.2 [5.0]). Only one study assessed outcomes comparing ACLR with rehabilitation only. Conclusions Knee self-efficacy and kinesiophobia improved from pre-ACLR to 3-6 months following ACLR, with similar outcomes after 6 months. Since the overall evidence was weak, there is a need for high-quality observational and intervention studies focusing on psychological outcomes following ACL injury.
|
|
7. |
- Casula, V., et al.
(author)
-
Quantitative evaluation of the tibiofemoral joint cartilage by T2 mapping in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament injury vs contralateral knees : results from the subacute phase using data from the NACOX study cohort
- 2022
-
In: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. - : Elsevier BV. - 1063-4584 .- 1522-9653. ; 30:7, s. 987-997
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Immediate cartilage structural alterations in the acute phase after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture may be a precursor to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development. Our aim was to describe changes in cartilage matrix in the subacute phase of the acutely ACL-injured knee compared to the contralateral uninjured knee. Design: Participants (n = 118) aged 15–40 years with an acute ACL injury were consecutively included in subacute phase after acute ACL-injury and underwent MRI (mean 29 days post trauma) of both knees. Mean T2 relaxation times, T2 spatial coefficient of variation and cartilage thickness were determined for different regions of the tibiofemoral cartilage. Differences between the acutely ACL-injured and uninjured knee were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: T2 relaxation time in injured knees was increased in multiple cartilage regions from both medial and lateral compartment compared to contralateral knees, mostly in medial trochlea and posterior tibia (P-value<0.001). In the same sites of injured knees, we observed significantly thinner cartilage. Moreover, injured knees presented shorter T2 relaxation time in superficial cartilage on lateral central femur and trochlea (P-value<0.001), and decreased T2 spatial coefficient of variation in lateral trochlea and load bearing regions of medial-central femoral condyle and central tibia in both compartments. Conclusion: Small but statistically significant differences were observed in the subacute phase between ACL-injured and uninjured knee in cartilage T2 relaxation time and cartilage thickness. Future longitudinal observations of the same cohort will allow for better understanding of early development of PTOA. Trial registration number: NCT02931084.
|
|
8. |
- Cristiani, Riccardo, et al.
(author)
-
High prevalence of associated injuries in anterior cruciate ligament tears: A detailed magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 254 patients
- 2024
-
In: Skeletal Radiology. - : SPRINGER. - 0364-2348 .- 1432-2161.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives To evaluate the type and prevalence of associated injuries by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.Methods Data from the Natural Corollaries and Recovery after ACL injury multicenter longitudinal cohort study were analyzed. Between May 2016 and October 2018, patients aged between 15 and 40 years, who had experienced an ACL tear within the last 6 weeks and sought medical attention at one of seven healthcare clinics in Sweden, were invited to participate. The mean time from injury to MRI was 19.6 +/- 15.2 days. An orthopedic knee surgeon and a musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed all the MRI scans. The following structures were assessed: posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL) complex, lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus tendon, medial meniscus (MM), lateral meniscus (LM), and cartilage. In addition, the presence of bone bruising, impaction fractures in the lateral femoral condyle (LFC) or posterolateral tibia (PLT), and Segond fractures were also assessed. Results A total of 254 patients (48.4% males) with a mean age of 25.4 +/- 7.1 years were included. The prevalence of associated injuries was as follows: PCL (0.4%), MCL {41.3% [superficial MCL and deep MCL (dMCL) 16.5%; isolated dMCL 24.8%]}, LCL (2.4%), MM (57.4%), LM (25.2%), cartilage (15.0%), bone bruising (92.9%), impaction fracture in the LFC (45.7%) and PLT (4.7%), and Segond fracture (7.5%).Conclusions The prevalence of associated injuries in patients with ACL tears was high. The findings reported in this study may serve as a reference tool for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists in the diagnosis of associated injuries using MRI in patients with ACL tears.
|
|
9. |
- Cristiani, Riccardo, et al.
(author)
-
High prevalence of meniscal ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament injuries
- 2023
-
In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. - : Springer. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 31:1, s. 316-324
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of and factors associated with meniscal ramp lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Methods Data from the Natural Corollaries and Recovery after ACL injury multicentre longitudinal cohort study (NACOX) were analysed. Only patients who underwent MRI were included in this study. All MRI scans were reviewed by an orthopaedic knee surgeon and a musculoskeletal radiologist. The patients were divided into two groups, those with and without ramp lesions according to MRI findings. Univariable and stepwise forward multiple logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, pre-injury Tegner activity level, activity at injury) and concomitant injuries on MRI (lateral meniscus, medial collateral ligament [MCL], isolated deep MCL, lateral collateral ligament, pivot-shift-type bone bruising, posteromedial tibial [PMT] bone bruising, medial femoral condyle bone bruising, lateral femoral condyle [LFC] impaction and a Segond fracture) associated with the presence of meniscal ramp lesions. Results A total of 253 patients (52.2% males) with a mean age of 25.4 +/- 7.1 years were included. The overall prevalence of meniscal ramp lesions was 39.5% (100/253). Univariate analyses showed that contact sports at ACL injury, pivot-shift-type bone bruising, PMT bone bruising, LFC impaction and the presence of a Segond fracture increased the odds of having a meniscal ramp lesion. Stepwise forward multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of a meniscal ramp lesion was associated with contact sports at ACL injury [odds ratio (OR) 2.50; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.32-4.72; P = 0.005], pivot-shift-type bone bruising (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.67; P = 0.04), PMT bone bruising (OR 4.62; 95% CI 2.61-8.19; P < 0.001) and the presence of a Segond fracture (OR 4.38; 95% CI 1.40-13.68; P = 0.001). Conclusion The overall prevalence of meniscal ramp lesions in patients with ACL injuries was high (39.5%). Contact sports at ACL injury, pivot-shift-type bone bruising, PMT bone bruising and the presence of a Segond fracture on MRI were associated with meniscal ramp lesions. Given their high prevalence, meniscal ramp lesions should be systematically searched for on MRI in patients with ACL injuries. Knowledge of the factors associated with meniscal ramp lesions may facilitate their diagnosis, raising surgeons and radiologists suspicion of these tears.
|
|
10. |
- Cristiani, Riccardo, et al.
(author)
-
High Prevalence of Superficial and Deep Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
- 2024
-
In: Arthroscopy. - : W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC. - 0749-8063 .- 1526-3231. ; 40:1, s. 103-110
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To assess the prevalence of and factors associated with medial collateral ligament (MCL) complex injuries on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.Methods: Data were extracted from the Natural Corollaries and Recovery After ACL Injury (NACOX) multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Between May 2016 and October 2018, patients who presented to 1 of 7 health care clinics across Sweden with an ACL tear sustained no more than 6 weeks earlier and who were aged between 15 and 40 years at the time of injury were invited to participate. All the patients included in this study underwent MRI. The mean time from injury to MRI was 19.6 +/- 15.2 days. An orthopaedic surgeon specializing in knee surgery and a musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed all MRI scans. Injuries to the superficial MCL (sMCL), deep MCL (dMCL), and posterior oblique ligament were identified. Stepwise forward multiple binary logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, preinjury Tegner activity level, and activity at injury) and injuries on MRI (lateral meniscus [LM] injury, medial meniscus [MM] injury, pivot shift-type bone bruising, medial femoral condyle [MFC] bone bruising, and lateral femoral condyle [LFC] impaction) associated with the presence of MCL complex tears.Results: In total, 254 patients (48.4% male patients) with a mean age of 25.4 +/- 7.1 years were included. The overall prevalence of MCL (sMCL and dMCL) injuries and isolated dMCL injuries was 16.5% (42 of 254) and 24.8% (63 of 254), respectively. No isolated sMCL injuries were found. Posterior oblique ligament injuries were found in 12 patients (4.7%) with MCL (sMCL and dMCL) injuries. An LM injury (odds ratio [OR], 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-8.94; P = .001) and LFC impaction (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.11-5.07; P = .02) increased the odds of having an MCL injury, whereas an MM injury (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.59; P = .001) reduced the odds. Isolated dMCL injuries were significantly associated with MFC bone bruising (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.92-9.25; P < .001) and LFC impaction (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.99-7.49; P < .001).Conclusions: The overall combined prevalence of MCL (sMCL and dMCL) injuries and isolated dMCL injuries in patients with ACL tears was high (16.5% + 24.8% = 41.3%). The presence of an LM injury and LFC impaction increased the odds of having an MCL injury, whereas the presence of an MM injury reduced the odds. MFC bone bruising and LFC impaction were associated with the presence of isolated dMCL injuries.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
|
|