| 1. |
- Lane, Paul, 1957-
(author)
-
“African Church”, Botswana
- 2015
-
In: <em>Trophies, Relics and Curios? </em>. - Leiden : Sidestone Press. - 9789088902710 ; , s. 118-125
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Lane, Paul, 1957-, et al.
(author)
-
Editorial: : Azania at Fifty
- 2015
-
In: Azania. - London : Taylor & Francis. - 0067-270X .- 1945-5534. ; 50:4, s. 425-436
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Lane, Paul, 1957-
(author)
-
Just how long does ‘long-term’ have to be? : Matters of temporal scale as impediments to interdisciplinary understanding in historical ecology
- 2015
-
In: <em>Oxford Handbook of AppliedArchaeology</em>. - Oxford : Oxford University Press.
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The phrase ‘long term’ is increasingly used as a keyword descriptive for research proposals and outputs claiming to contribute to debates on past and future climate change, sustainable economies, and the resilience of different landscapes. Scholars from across the environmental and social sciences and the humanities are engaged in this kind of research and are keen to see their results used to influence policy and practice. While ostensibly addressing mutually common issues, scrutiny of these studies indicates very divergent uses of the term ‘long term’. Such variation can act as an impediment to the development of truly interdisciplinary historical ecologies, especially since scholars often fail to specify the precise temporal range they have in mind when they employ the phrase ‘long term’. This chapter reviews these alternative understandings of the term and their associated problems, and offers some suggestions as to how these might be overcome.
|
|
| 8. |
- Lane, Paul, 1957-
(author)
-
Peripheral vision : Reflections on the death and rebirth of ethnoarchaeology
- 2015
-
In: <em>Breaking Barriers</em>. - Calgary : Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Calgary. - 9780889533868 ; , s. 19-34
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Initially formalized as a distinct domain of archaeological research in 1960s and 1970s as part of ‘processual archaeology’, but with intellectual roots (and routes) extending back to the beginnings of antiquarianism in early post-medieval European society, ethnoarchaeology has persistently been regarded as a supplier of the raw materials of theoretical and methodological insight rather than as producer in its own right. Both literally and metaphorically, its practioners have been regarded as occupying the periphery of the discipline supplying convenient ‘ethnographic facts’ that can be refashioned into overarching theories by those at the disciplinary centre. Drawing on an analysis of the contributions of ethnoarchaeological research conducted in Africa over the last four-five decades, this paper offers an alternative perspective that celebrates the theoretically innovative nature of a hybridized, post-colonial ethnoarchaeology.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
