SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Leuzinger Sebastian) srt2:(2020-2024)"

Search: WFRF:(Leuzinger Sebastian) > (2020-2024)

  • Result 1-4 of 4
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Liu, Yulin, et al. (author)
  • Soil type and temperature determine soil respiration seasonal dynamics in dairy grassland
  • 2024
  • In: Soil Ecology Letters. - : Springer Nature. - 2662-2289. ; 6:4
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Soil respiration rates (Rs) were measured in New Zealand dairy grassland.Both season and soil type significantly affected Rs.Soil temperature and soil type dominated overall Rs.Soil respiration (Rs), the CO2 release from root respiration and microbial metabolism, affects global soil carbon storage and cycling. Only few studies have looked at Rs in the southern hemisphere, especially regarding the interaction between soil type and environmental factors on Rs in dairy grassland. We investigated the relationship between Rs and soil temperature (Ts), soil water content (SWC), soil type, and other environmental factors based on summer and winter measurements at four sites in New Zealand. Across sites, soil respiration rates ranged from 0.29 to 14.58 with a mean of 5.38 +/- 0.13 (mean +/- standard error) mu mol CO2 m-2 s-1. Mean summer R s was 86.5% higher than mean winter Rs, largely driven by organic/gley and pumice soils while ultic soils showed very little seasonal temperature sensitivity. Overall mean Rs in organic/gley soils was 108.0% higher than that in ultic soils. The high Rs rate observed in organic/gley was likely due to high soil organic matter content, while low Rs in ultic and pallic soils resulted from high clay content and low hydraulic conductance. Soil temperature drove overall Rs. Our findings indicate that soil type and soil temperature together best explain Rs. This implies that a mere classification of land use type may be insufficient for global C models and should be supplemented with soil type information, at least locally.
  •  
2.
  • Ravi, Sridevi, et al. (author)
  • Are the well-fed less thirsty? : Effects of drought and salinity on New Zealand mangroves
  • 2022
  • In: Journal of Plant Ecology. - : Oxford University Press. - 1752-9921 .- 1752-993X. ; 15:1, s. 85-99
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Despite a large number of studies examining the effects of abiotic stress factors on plants, the mechanistic explanations of drought-induced tree mortality remain inconclusive and even less is known about how multiple stressors interact. The role of non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) in preventing or postponing drought mortality is gaining attention. Here, we tested the role of NSCs in mitigating the effects of drought and salinity in New Zealand mangroves, Avicennia marina subsp. australasica. We experimentally manipulated plant NSC levels, prior to subjecting them to combinations of drought and salinity. Plant growth and survival rates were 2- and 3-fold higher in the high-NSC (H-NSC) group than in the low-NSC (L-NSC) group under high salinity and drought conditions, respectively. After 12 weeks under high salinity-high drought conditions, the H-NSC group showed higher stem hydraulic conductivity (281 +/- 50 mmol cm(-1) s(-1) MPa-1) compared with the L-NSC group (134 +/- 40 mmol cm(-1) s(-1) MPa-1). Although starch levels remained relatively constant, we found a 20% increase in soluble sugars in the stems of H-NSC group under high drought and high salinity in week 8 compared with week 12. Our results suggest (i) an important role of NSCs in mitigating the effects of low soil water potential caused by drought and salinity, and (ii) sink-limited growth under conditions of combined salinity and drought.
  •  
3.
  • Van Sundert, Kevin, et al. (author)
  • When things get MESI : The Manipulation Experiments Synthesis Initiative—A coordinated effort to synthesize terrestrial global change experiments
  • 2023
  • In: Global Change Biology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1354-1013 .- 1365-2486. ; 29:7, s. 1922-1938
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Responses of the terrestrial biosphere to rapidly changing environmental conditions are a major source of uncertainty in climate projections. In an effort to reduce this uncertainty, a wide range of global change experiments have been conducted that mimic future conditions in terrestrial ecosystems, manipulating CO2, temperature, and nutrient and water availability. Syntheses of results across experiments provide a more general sense of ecosystem responses to global change, and help to discern the influence of background conditions such as climate and vegetation type in determining global change responses. Several independent syntheses of published data have yielded distinct databases for specific objectives. Such parallel, uncoordinated initiatives carry the risk of producing redundant data collection efforts and have led to contrasting outcomes without clarifying the underlying reason for divergence. These problems could be avoided by creating a publicly available, updatable, curated database. Here, we report on a global effort to collect and curate 57,089 treatment responses across 3644 manipulation experiments at 1145 sites, simulating elevated CO2, warming, nutrient addition, and precipitation changes. In the resulting Manipulation Experiments Synthesis Initiative (MESI) database, effects of experimental global change drivers on carbon and nutrient cycles are included, as well as ancillary data such as background climate, vegetation type, treatment magnitude, duration, and, unique to our database, measured soil properties. Our analysis of the database indicates that most experiments are short term (one or few growing seasons), conducted in the USA, Europe, or China, and that the most abundantly reported variable is aboveground biomass. We provide the most comprehensive multifactor global change database to date, enabling the research community to tackle open research questions, vital to global policymaking. The MESI database, freely accessible at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7153253, opens new avenues for model evaluation and synthesis-based understanding of how global change affects terrestrial biomes. We welcome contributions to the database on GitHub.
  •  
4.
  • Walker, Anthony P., et al. (author)
  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2
  • 2021
  • In: New Phytologist. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0028-646X .- 1469-8137. ; 229:5, s. 2413-2445
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) is increasing, which increases leaf‐scale photosynthesis and intrinsic water‐use efficiency. These direct responses have the potential to increase plant growth, vegetation biomass, and soil organic matter; transferring carbon from the atmosphere into terrestrial ecosystems (a carbon sink). A substantial global terrestrial carbon sink would slow the rate of [CO2] increase and thus climate change. However, ecosystem CO2 responses are complex or confounded by concurrent changes in multiple agents of global change and evidence for a [CO2]‐driven terrestrial carbon sink can appear contradictory. Here we synthesize theory and broad, multidisciplinary evidence for the effects of increasing [CO2] (iCO2) on the global terrestrial carbon sink. Evidence suggests a substantial increase in global photosynthesis since pre‐industrial times. Established theory, supported by experiments, indicates that iCO2 is likely responsible for about half of the increase. Global carbon budgeting, atmospheric data, and forest inventories indicate a historical carbon sink, and these apparent iCO2 responses are high in comparison to experiments and predictions from theory. Plant mortality and soil carbon iCO2 responses are highly uncertain. In conclusion, a range of evidence supports a positive terrestrial carbon sink in response to iCO2, albeit with uncertain magnitude and strong suggestion of a role for additional agents of global change.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-4 of 4

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view