1. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2014
-
In: Physical Review Letters. - 1079-7114 .- 0031-9007. ; 112:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
2. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2014
-
In: Journal of High Energy Physics. - : Springer. - 1029-8479 .- 1126-6708. ; :6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
3. |
- Asplund, Matthias, et al.
(author)
-
- 2016
-
In: Measurement. - : Elsevier BV. - 0263-2241 .- 1873-412X. ; 92, s. 19-27
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Reliable data with less variation play a key role for acceptance of the usefulness of the measurement output of a wheel profile measurement system (WPMS) in a railway network. However, in practice, most studies are carried out without checking the reliability of data from such a system, which may lead to inappropriate maintenance strategies. To ensure the measurement capability of WPMS and to support robust maintenance in railway systems, this study has evaluated measurement data for the flange height, flange thickness, flange slope, and tread hollowing of rolling stock wheels by using gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R). In this study, acceptance and rejection criteria for the precision-to-tolerance ratio (PTR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and discrimination ratio (DR) have been employed to evaluate the measurement capabilities. For the purpose of illustration, we have implemented a new proposed approach. This approach involves both an analysis using graphs with four regions with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and an analysis using a graph with three regions with only the predicted values; the latter type of graph represents an innovation made in this study. The results show that the measurements of the tread hollowing and flange slope are on an acceptable level, while those for the flange height and flange thickness have to be rejected as unacceptable. The action proposed to increase the quality of data on the flange height and flange thickness is to enhance the calibration of the WPMS. In conclusion, GR&R is a useful tool to evaluate the measurement capability of WPMS and to provide helpful support for maintenance decision making.
|
|
4. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2015
-
In: Physical Review Letters. - 1079-7114 .- 0031-9007. ; 115:9
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
5. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
6. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
7. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2012
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
8. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2012
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
9. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
10. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|