| 1. |
- Emilsson, Össur Ingi, et al.
(author)
-
Nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux and respiratory symptoms are increased in sleep apnoea : comparison with the general population
- 2024
-
In: BMJ Open Respiratory Research. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2052-4439. ; 11:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim To assess respiratory symptoms and nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux (nGER) among untreated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients, compared with the general population. Also, if nGER associates differently with respiratory symptoms among OSA patients.Methods 2 study cohorts were included: 822 newly diagnosed subjects with moderate–severe OSA and 738 Icelandic general population study participants. All participants answered the same questionnaires. Those reporting nGER symptoms at least once per week were defined as ‘with nGER’; those without nGER symptoms and without nGER medication were defined as ‘no nGER’; and other participants were defined as having ‘possible nGER’. Propensity score-based weights were used to minimise confounding and selection bias and facilitate causal interpretations.Results The prevalence of nGER among OSA patients was 14.1%, compared with 5.8% in the general population. This increased prevalence in OSA was not explained by differences in age, gender, body mass index, smoking, hypertension and diabetes (adjusted OR (95% CI)=3.79 (2.24 to 6.43)). OSA patients ‘with nGER’ and with ‘possible nGER’ reported more wheezing (44% and 44% vs 25%, respectively) and productive cough (47% and 42% vs 29%, respectively), compared with OSA patients with ‘no nGER’. The same pattern was seen in the general population, although with a generally lower prevalence. The effect of nGER on respiratory symptoms was similar between the two cohorts.Conclusion nGER was more often reported among untreated moderate–severe OSA patients than in the general population. Participants with nGER had more wheezing and productive cough, both among untreated OSA patients and in the general population.
|
|
| 2. |
- Emilsson, Össur Ingi, et al.
(author)
-
Positive airway pressure treatment affects respiratory symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux : the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort Study
- 2023
-
In: ERJ Open Research. - : European Respiratory Society. - 2312-0541. ; 9:5
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: To study the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment on nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux (nGOR) and respiratory symptoms among clinical obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients.Methods: 822 patients newly diagnosed with OSA referred for PAP treatment were recruited. 732 patients had a 2-year follow-up visit with continuous PAP compliance data (366 full PAP users, 366 partial/non-PAP users). They answered questionnaires, including reporting of nGOR, sleep and respiratory symptoms and general health. Patients with nGOR symptoms once a week or more were defined as "with nGOR". Those without nGOR symptoms and nGOR medication were defined as "no nGOR". Others were defined as "possible nGOR".Results: At 2-year follow-up, PAP treatment among full users resulted in decreased nGOR (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.86) and wheezing (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.88) compared with partial/non-PAP users. Decreased nGOR, among both full and partial/non-users of PAP treatment, was associated with a decrease in productive morning cough (adjusted OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.22-9.99) and a decrease in chronic bronchitis (adjusted OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.74-8.58), but not decreased wheezing (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.39-2.08). A mediation analysis found that PAP treatment directly led to a decrease in wheezing, not mediated through nGOR. Conversely, PAP treatment decreased productive cough mediated through a decrease in nGOR.Conclusion: In an unselected group of OSA patients, PAP treatment for 2 years was associated with a decrease in nGOR and respiratory symptoms. The PAP treatment itself was associated with less wheezing. A decrease in nGOR through PAP treatment was associated with a decrease in productive cough.
|
|
| 3. |
- Thorarinsdottir, Elin H., et al.
(author)
-
Different components of excessive daytime sleepiness and the change with positive airway pressure treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea : Results from the Icelandic Sleep Apnea Cohort (ISAC)
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Sleep Research. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0962-1105 .- 1365-2869. ; 31:3
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Excessive daytime sleepiness includes both an inability to stay awake during the day and a general feeling of sleepiness. We describe different dimensions of daytime sleepiness in adults with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) before and after 2 years of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment. Using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (score >10 defined as "risk of dozing") and Basic Nordic Sleep Questionnaire (feeling sleepy >= 3 times/week defined as "feeling sleepy"), participants were categorised into sleepiness phenotypes labelled non-sleepy, risk of dozing only, feeling sleepy only, or both symptoms. Participants repeated baseline assessments and PAP adherence was evaluated after 2 years. PAP-adherent subjects with sleepiness symptoms at both baseline and follow-up were considered persistently sleepy. Of the 810 participants, 722 (89%) returned for follow-up. At baseline, 17.7% were non-sleepy, 7.7% were at risk of dozing only, 24.7% were feeling sleepy only, and 49.9% had both symptoms. PAP adherence did not differ by baseline sleepiness phenotype. Patients with risk of dozing demonstrated greater PAP benefits for sleepiness symptoms than non-sleepy and feeling sleepy only phenotypes. Using these phenotypes, 42.3% of PAP users had persistent sleepiness; they had less severe OSA (p < 0.001), more persistent OSA symptoms and more often had symptoms of insomnia than patients in whom sleepiness resolved. Our present results, therefore, suggest that measuring the risk of dozing and the feeling of sleepiness reflect different sleepiness components and may respond differently to PAP. Patients feeling sleepy without risk of dozing may need more thorough evaluation for factors contributing to sleepiness before initiating treatment.
|
|
| 4. |
- Thorarinsdottir, Elin H., et al.
(author)
-
Polysomnographic characteristics of excessive daytime sleepiness phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea : results from the international sleep apnea global interdisciplinary consortium
- 2024
-
In: Sleep. - : Oxford University Press. - 0161-8105 .- 1550-9109. ; 47:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Study Objectives: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a major symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Traditional polysomnographic (PSG) measures only partially explain EDS in OSA. This study analyzed traditional and novel PSG characteristics of two different measures of EDS among patients with OSA. Methods: Sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (>10 points defined as "risk of dozing") and a measure of general sleepiness (feeling sleepy >= 3 times/week defined as "feeling sleepy"). Four sleepiness phenotypes were identified: "non-sleepy," "risk of dozing only," "feeling sleepy only," and "both at risk of dozing and feeling sleepy." Results: Altogether, 2083 patients with OSA (69% male) with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >= 5 events/hour were studied; 46% were "non-sleepy," 26% at "risk of dozing only," 7% were "feeling sleepy only," and 21% reported both. The two phenotypes at "risk of dozing" had higher AHI, more severe hypoxemia (as measured by oxygen desaturation index, minimum and average oxygen saturation [SpO(2)], time spent < 90% SpO(2), and hypoxic impacts) and they spent less time awake, had shorter sleep latency, and higher heart rate response to arousals than "non-sleepy" and "feeling sleepy only" phenotypes. While statistically significant, effect sizes were small. Sleep stages, frequency of arousals, wake after sleep onset and limb movement did not differ between sleepiness phenotypes after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: In a large international group of patients with OSA, PSG characteristics were weakly associated with EDS. The physiological measures differed among individuals characterized as "risk of dozing" or "non-sleepy," while "feeling sleepy only" did not differ from "non-sleepy" individuals.
|
|
