1. |
|
|
2. |
- Berntorp, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.
- 2003
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 9:Suppl 1, s. 41278-41278
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long-term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality-of-life assessment instruments, and cost-benefit analyses.
|
|
3. |
- Manco-Johnson, MJ, et al.
(author)
-
Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: current status and future directions
- 2004
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216 .- 1365-2516. ; 10, s. 88-93
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Routine infusions of factor VIII to prevent bleeding, known as prophylaxis, and other intensive therapies are being more broadly applied to patients with haemophilia. These therapies differ widely in replacement product usage, cost, frequency of venous access and parental effort. In order to address residual issues relating to recommendations, implementation, and evaluations of prophylaxis therapy in persons with haemophila, a multinational working group was formed and called the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG). The group was comprised of haemophilia treaters actively involved in studies of prophylaxis from North America and Europe. Two expert committees, the Physical Therapy (PT) Working Group and the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Working Group were organized to critically assess existing tools for assessment of Joint outcome. These two committees independently concluded that the WFH Physical Examination Scale (WFH PE Scale) and the WFH X-ray Scale (WFH XR Scale) were inadequately sensitive to detect early changes in Joints. New scales were developed based on suggested modifications of the existing scales and called the Haemophilia joint Health Score (HJHS) and the International MRI Scales. The new scales were piloted. Concordance was measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient of variation. Reliability of the HJHS was excellent with an inter-observer co-efficient of 0.83 and a test-retest value of 0.89. The MRI study was conducted using both Denver and European scoring approaches; inter-reader reliability using the two approaches was 0.88 and 0.87; test-retest reliability was 0.92 and 0.93. These new PT and MRI scales promise to improve outcome assessment in children on early preventive treatment regimens.
|
|
4. |
- Berntorp, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
An approach to study the viral safety of plasma-derived products in previously treated, non-infected patients
- 2001
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216 .- 1365-2516. ; 7:4, s. 360-363
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we designed a study concept to evaluate the safety of plasma derivatives in previously treated patients who are non-infected by the specific viruses studied. Several product lots can be studied in a single patient, with a study period for each lot of 3 months. In the present study 19 patients were included for treatment with Baxter Hyland Immuno's PCR-screened factor VIII concentrate Immunate (n=7), factor IX concentrate Immunine (n=10), the by-passing agent FEIBA plus Immunine (n=1), and the protein C concentrate Ceprotin (n=1). PCR testing for hepatitis B, C or HIV genomic material in patient samples was done as well as serological testing. All patients remained negative for the tested markers. All seven Immunate patients completed three treatment periods with three different lots of the study drug. The median study period was 282 days and the median dose 115 000 units, with a median of 115 exposure days. Five of the 10 Immunine patients completed three treatment periods and four patients, two treatment periods. One Immunine patient was discontinued from the study for reasons unrelated to the study drug administration. The median study period was 305 days and the median total dose 82 200 units, with a median of 88 exposure days. Our study presents a new design to approach the evaluation of viral safety of new plasma derivatives in previously treated, non-infected patients (NIPs) and offers several advantages over the currently recommended studies using testing for serological markers of infection in previously untreated patients (PUPs).
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Knobe, Karin, et al.
(author)
-
Breastfeeding does not influence the development of inhibitors in haemophilia.
- 2002
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 8:5, s. 657-659
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Our aim was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding may reduce development of inhibitors in male infants with haemophilia by inducing an oral immune tolerance to factor VIII. To achieve that goal, we performed a structured epidemiological survey comprising all males born with severe haemophilia A (in all 100 patients, 19 with inhibitors) or haemophilia B (in all 16 patients, six with inhibitors) in Sweden in 1980-99. Our results show no protective effect of breastfeeding.
|
|
9. |
- Knobe, Karin, et al.
(author)
-
Factor VIII inhibitors in two families with mild haemophilia A: structural analysis of the mutations
- 2000
-
In: Haemostasis. - : S. Karger AG. - 0301-0147. ; 30:5, s. 268-279
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The development of inhibitory antibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with mild haemophilia A is uncommon. We describe here two families in which three or two members have developed inhibitors, suggesting a familial predisposition. The mutations found, in the A2 (Arg593Cys) and C1 domains (Tyr2105Cys), have been reported to give rise to inhibitor development in single individuals in addition to the family cluster we describe, strongly suggesting that these amino acid substitutions give rise to a more immunogenic protein. The analysis of structural models of activated factor VIII revealed that Arg593 is solvent-exposed and involved in a network of electrostatic interactions while Tyr2105 is partially buried and has hydrophobic interactions essentially with Ile2144. All these residues are strictly conserved in the FVIII amino acid sequence from man, pig and mouse, suggesting, at least, that they have structural roles. We propose that the two mutations in these families could cause mild haemophilia A because they induce local conformational changes (and possible secretion or intermolecular interaction problems, e.g., with von Willebrand factor) compatible with immunogenicity and production of inhibitors against the infused wild-type FVIII.
|
|
10. |
- Ljung, R., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment of children with haemophilia in Europe: A survey of 20 centres in 16 countries
- 2000
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 6, s. 619-624
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- A survey was made of the current status of treatment of haemophilic boys at 20 centres in 16 European countries and includes approximately 1500 of the estimated 6500 haemophiliacs in the participating countries. Many mild haemophiliacs are not seen, or seen infrequently, at haemophilia centres and this requires study. Nine of 18 centres provide continuous prophylaxis to 80-100% of their patients, five centres provide it to 55-80% and the remaining four centres to 15-40% of the boys. The median dose given was 6240 U kg-1 year-1 (range 3120-7800). Four centres administered only recombinant concentrates to children with severe haemophilia A, while seven centres administered recombinant concentrates to 75-90% and the remaining centres to less than 50% of the boys (two centres <10%). When asked for the choice of concentrate for a newly diagnosed boy with severe haemophilia A, all but one centre preferred recombinant concentrate. Most boys below 6 years received concentrates via a peripheral vein but three centres preferred a central venous line for 80-100% of the boys. Thirteen of 18 centres applied home treatment to 84-100% of the boys and the remaining five centres to 57-77% of the boys.
|
|