| 1. |
- Gudbjartsson, Tomas, et al.
(author)
-
Early surgical results after pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer are not affected by preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
- 2008
-
In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1552-6259 .- 0003-4975. ; 86:2, s. 376-382
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Higher operative risks after pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both. Patients who underwent pneumonectomy for NSCLC were evaluated for effect of neoadjuvant treatment on mortality and morbidity, especially bronchopleural fistula. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2003, 130 consecutive patients underwent pneumonectomy: 35 received preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (the neoadjuvant group), and 95 patients did not (the first-surgery group). Operative mortality and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Minor postoperative complications were comparable in both groups (p > 0.10). Five patients in the neoadjuvant group and 10 in the first-surgery group had serious complications (p = 0.55). Eight had bronchopleural fistulas (7 right and 1 left, p < 0.01); 3 were in the neoadjuvant group (p = 0.49). Three fistulas required reoperation. One patient in the first-surgery group died within 30 days postoperatively. Duration of symptoms (hazard ratio, 6.6; p = 0.01) and right-sided pneumonectomy (hazard ratio, 2.4; p = 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of bronchopleural fistula. Induction treatment, postoperative radiotherapy, or coverage of the bronchial stump did not increase the risk of bronchopleural fistulation. Survival at 1 and 5 years was comparable for the neoadjuvant and first-surgery groups: 74% and 46% vs 72% and 34%, respectively (p > 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonectomy is a safe procedure with low operative mortality. Postoperative morbidity is significant, especially bronchopleural fistulas after right-sided pneumonectomy (11%). However, neither operative mortality nor morbidity appears to be directly associated with preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ingolfsson, Ingimar, et al.
(author)
-
Reoperations are common following VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax: study of risk factors.
- 2006
-
In: Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. - 1569-9285. ; 5:5, s. 7-602
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Abstract OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for reoperation following surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical study conducted on 240 consecutive patients operated on for spontaneous pneumothorax in Lund University Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003. Patient information was gained from medical charts and operation reports. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors. Median follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was used in 93% of the patients, where bullectomy with or without pleurodesis/pleurectomy was performed in most cases. Conversion to anterolateral thoracotomy was required in 6 cases (2.3%). Operative mortality (<30 days) was 0.8% (0% after VATS). Altogether 35 patients (13.7%) required a reoperation. Twenty patients were reoperated on within one month from surgery, most often due to prolonged air leakage (n=13, 5.1%) and bleeding (n=6, 2.3%). Fifteen patients (5.8%) were reoperated on because of recurrent pneumothorax, on average 17 months (range 1-39 months) after the primary operation. Significant independent risk factors for reoperation were; young age, operations performed for secondary pneumothorax due to emphysema and recurrent pneumothorax. The risk was also increased in patients where wedge resection was not performed. However, the type of pleurodesis or pleurectomy was not related to increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients require reoperation after VATS for pneumothorax. Most reoperations are due to prolonged air leakage or recurrent pneumothorax. The risk for reoperation is increased in younger patients, patients operated for recurrent or secondary pneumothorax, and in cases where pulmonary wedge resection is not performed.
|
|
| 3. |
- Pikwer, Andreas, et al.
(author)
-
Management of Inadvertent Arterial Catheterisation Associated with Central Venous Access Procedures.
- 2009
-
In: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2165 .- 1078-5884. ; 38, s. 707-714
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the clinical management of inadvertent arterial catheterisation after attempted central venous catheterisation. METHODS: Patients referred for surgical or endovascular management for inadvertent arterial catheterisation during a 5-year period were identified from an endovascular database, providing prospective information on techniques and outcome. The corresponding patient records and radiographic reports were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Eleven inadvertent arterial (four common carotid, six subclavian and one femoral) catheterisations had been carried out in 10 patients. Risk factors were obesity (n=2), short neck (n=1) and emergency procedure (n=4). All central venous access procedures but one had been made using external landmark techniques. The techniques used were stent-graft placement (n=6), percutaneous suture device (n=2), external compression after angiography (n=1), balloon occlusion and open repair (n=1) and open repair after failure of percutaneous suture device (n=1). There were no procedure-related complications within a median follow-up period of 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent arterial catheterisation during central venous cannulation is associated with obesity, emergency puncture and lack of ultrasonic guidance and should be suspected on retrograde/pulsatile catheter flow or local haematoma. If arterial catheterisation is recognised, the catheter should be left in place and the patient be referred for percutaneous/endovascular or surgical management.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Pikwer, Andreas, et al.
(author)
-
Routine chest X-ray is not required after a low-risk central venous cannulation.
- 2009
-
In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 53, s. 1145-1152
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Knowledge of the radiographic catheter tip position after central venous cannulation is normally not required for short-term catheter use. Detection of a possible iatrogenic pneumothorax may nevertheless justify routine post-procedure chest X-ray. Our aim was to design a clinical decision rule to select patients for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation. Methods: A total of 2230 catheterizations performed using external jugular, internal jugular or subclavian venous approaches during a 4-year period were included consecutively. Information on patient data and corresponding procedures was recorded prospectively. A post-procedure chest X-ray was obtained after each cannulation. Results: Thirteen cases (0.58%) of cannulation-associated pneumothorax were identified. The risk of pneumothorax after a technically difficult (1.8%) or subclavian (1.6%) cannulation was significantly higher than after cannulation not considered as difficult (0.37%) or performed using other routes (0.33%). Clinical signs of pneumothorax within 8 h of cannulation were found in all seven patients with pneumothorax requiring specific treatment. A new clinical decision rule for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation based on the results of the present study shows that 48% of the post-procedure chest X-rays performed in our patients were clinically redundant. Conclusion: Clinical symptoms were reported in all patients with pneumothorax requiring specific treatment. Approximately half of the post-procedure chest X-ray controls could be avoided using the proposed clinical decision rule to select patients for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation. A large prospective multi-centre study should be carried out to further evaluate this decision rule.
|
|
| 7. |
- Pikwer, Andreas, et al.
(author)
-
The incidence and risk of central venous catheter malpositioning: a prospective cohort study in 1619 patients.
- 2008
-
In: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. - 0310-057X. ; 36:1, s. 30-37
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Central venous catheters are used in various hospital wards. An anterior-posterior chest X-ray is usually obtained soon after cannulation to assess the location of the catheter tip. This prospective clinical study was designed to determine the radiographic catheter tip position after central venous cannulation by various routes, to identify clinical problems possibly associated with the use of malpositioned catheters and to make a cost-benefit analysis of routine chest X-ray with respect to catheter malposition. A total 1619 central venous cannulations were recorded during a three-year period with respect to patient data, information about the cannulation procedures, the radiographic catheter positions and complications during clinical use. The total incidence of radiographic catheter tip malposition, defined as extrathoracic or ventricular positioning, was 3.3% (confidence interval 25 to 4.3%). Cannulation by the right subclavian vein was associated with the highest risk of malposition, 9.1%, compared with 1.4% by the right internal jugular vein. Six of the 53 malpositioned catheters were removed or adjusted. No case of malposition was associated with vascular perforation, local venous thrombosis or cerebral symptoms. We conclude that the radiographic incidence of central venous catheter malpositioning is low and that clinical use of malpositioned catheters is associated with few complications. However, determination of the catheter position by chest X-ray should be considered when mechanical complications cannot be excluded, aspiration of venous blood is not possible, or the catheter is intended for central venous pressure monitoring, high flow use or infusion of local irritant drugs.
|
|
