1. |
- Heydarkhan-Hagvall, Sepideh, 1969, et al.
(author)
-
DNA microarray study on gene expression profiles in co-cultured endothelial and smooth muscle cells in response to 4- and 24-h shear stress
- 2006
-
In: Molecular and cellular biochemistry. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0300-8177 .- 1573-4919. ; 281:1-2, s. 1-15
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Shear stress, a major hemodynamic force acting on the vessel wall, plays an important role in physiological processes such as cell growth, differentiation, remodelling, metabolism, morphology, and gene expression. We investigated the effect of shear stress on gene expression profiles in co-cultured vascular endothelial cells (ECs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Human aortic ECs were cultured as a confluent monolayer on top of confluent human aortic SMCs, and the EC side of the co-culture was exposed to a laminar shear stress of 12 dyn/cm(2) for 4 or 24 h. After shearing, the ECs and SMCs were separated and RNA was extracted from the cells. The RNA samples were labelled and hybridized with cDNA array slides that contained 8694 genes. Statistical analysis showed that shear stress caused the differential expression (p < or = 0.05) of a total of 1151 genes in ECs and SMCs. In the co-cultured ECs, shear stress caused the up-regulation of 403 genes and down-regulation of 470. In the co-cultured SMCs, shear stress caused the up-regulation of 152 genes and down-regulation of 126 genes. These results provide new information on the gene expression profile and its potential functional consequences in co-cultured ECs and SMCs exposed to a physiological level of laminar shear stress. Although the effects of shear stress on gene expression in monocultured and co-cultured EC are generally similar, the response of some genes to shear stress is opposite between these two types of culture (e.g., ICAM-1 is up-regulated in monoculture and down-regulated in co-culture), which strongly indicates that EC-SMC interactions affect EC responses to shear stress.
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Risberg, J, et al.
(author)
-
Biologisk psykologi : Biologisk psykologi
- 2005
-
In: Vår tids psykologi, P. Hwang, I Lundberg, J. Rönnberg & A.-C. Smedler (red:er). - Stockholm : Natur och kultur. ; , s. 49-90
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This book chapter briefly introduces the broad domain of biological psychology, which ranges from molecular mechanisms involved in learning and memory to clinical neuropsychology and neurophilosophy.
|
|
4. |
- Volkmann, E, et al.
(author)
-
Effect of varicose vein surgery on venous reflux scoring and plethysmographic assessment of venous function.
- 2008
-
In: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2165. ; 36:6, s. 731-7
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Colour duplex ultrasonography (CDU) is widely recommended before varicose vein surgery, combined with quantification of venous reflux by plethysmography where required. This study assessed venous haemodynamics before and after varicose vein surgery by venous outflow plethysmography (VOP), venous reflux plethysmography (VRP) and by adoption of a modified segmental venous reflux score (VRS). The effect of wearing one or two class I medical compression stockings was also assessed. The aim of the study was to identify parameters which reflect the outcome of treatment using medical compression stockings or surgical intervention. METHODS: 24 legs of 21 patients with superficial vein incompetence of clinical grade C(2-4a) (CEAP) were assessed before and a mean of 8 S.D. 4 months after superficial vein surgery. Investigations were CDU, as well as VOP and VRP using mercury in rubber gauges fitted either around the calf or the forefoot. Venous reflux was semi-quantitatively graded by CDU in relation to the actual vein diameter and transformed into a VRS with respect to the number of involved serial vein segments. The venous reflux rates were measured in standing patients after knee bending before and after application of one or two superimposed compression stockings (class I). RESULTS: According to VRP, one compression stocking reduced the maximum venous reflux rates (VR(max)) by about 30% which was comparable with the effect of surgery on VR(max). Two superimposed compression stockings were almost twice as effective and diminished VR(max) pre- and post operatively by around 60%. Varicose surgery reduced the maximum venous outflow rates significantly (pre-op: 166 S.D. 77 ml/min x 100 ml tissue, post op: 120 S.D. 34) and improved VRS (pre-op median 5.0 IQR: 4.5-5.5, post-op median 0.5 IQR: 0-1.0). Surgery had no effect on venous refilling time or venous reflux rates when measured without compression stockings. CONCLUSION: Venous reflux assessed by plethysmography was moderated by the use of compression stockings pre-operatively but did not reflect the outcome of surgical treatment of superficial venous reflux. Increased venous volume and venous outflow were restored to the levels of normal contralateral limbs by surgery. The VRS decreased considerably following surgery, reflecting the effect of surgical treatment on the number of incompetent venous segments. Changes in this parameter did not correlate with any of the plethysmographic measurements.
|
|