1. |
- Gavali, Hamid, et al.
(author)
-
Outcome of Radical Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections Comparing Extra-anatomic Bypass with In Situ Reconstruction : A Nationwide Multicentre Study
- 2021
-
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Saunders Elsevier. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 62:6, s. 918-926
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Abdominal aortic graft and endograft infection (AGI) is primarily treated by resection of the infected graft and restoration of distal perfusion through extra-anatomic bypass (EAB) or in situ reconstruction/repair (ISR). The aim of this study was to compare these surgical strategies in a nationwide multicentre retrospective cohort study.Methods: The Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) was used to identify surgically treated abdominal AGIs in Sweden between January 1995 and May 2017. The primary aim was to compare short and long term survival, as well as complications for EAB and ISR.Results: Some 126 radically surgically treated AGI patients were identified – 102 graft infections and 24 endograft infections – treated by EAB: 71 and ISR: 55 (23 neo-aorto-iliac systems, NAISs). No differences in early 30 day (EAB 81.7% vs. ISR 76.4%, p =.46), or long term five year survival (48.2% vs. 49.9%, p =.87) were identified. There was no survival difference comparing NAIS to other ISR strategies. The frequency of recurrent graft infection during follow up was similar: EAB 20.3% vs. ISR 17.0% (p =.56). Survival and re-infection rates of the new conduit did not differ between NAIS and other ISR strategies. Age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, confidence interval [CI] 1.1 – 14.8), coronary artery disease (OR 4.2, CI 1.2 – 15.1) and post-operative circulatory complications (OR 5.2, CI 1.2 – 22.5) were associated with early death. Prolonged antimicrobial therapy (> 3 months) was associated with reduced long term mortality (HR 0.3, CI 0.1 – 0.9).Conclusion: In this nationwide multicentre study comparing outcomes of radically treated AGI, no differences in survival or re-infection rate could be identified comparing EAB and ISR.
|
|
2. |
- Gavali, Hamid, et al.
(author)
-
Semi-Conservative Treatment Versus Radical Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections
- 2023
-
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 66:3, s. 397-406
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Abdominal aortic graft and endograft infections (AGIs) are rare complications following aortic surgery. Radical surgery (RS) with resection of the infected graft and reconstruction with extra-anatomical bypass or in situ reconstruction is the preferred therapy. For patients unfit for RS, a semi-conservative (SC), graft preserving strategy is possible. This paper aimed to compare survival and infection outcomes between RS and SC treatment for AGI in a nationwide cohort.Methods: Patients with abdominal AGI related surgery in Sweden between January 1995 and May 2017 were identified. The Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria were used for the definition of AGI. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.Results: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with surgically treated abdominal AGI were identified, comprising 43 SC (14 endografts; 53% with a graft enteric fistula [GEF] in total) and 126 RS (26 endografts; 50% with a GEF in total). The SC cohort was older and had a higher frequency of cardiac comorbidities. There was a non-significant trend towards lower Kaplan -Meier estimated five year survival for SC vs. RS (30.2% vs. 48.4%; p = .066). A non-significant trend was identified towards worse Kaplan -Meier estimated five year survival for SC patients with a GEF vs. without a GEF (21.7% vs. 40.1%; p = .097). There were significantly more recurrent graft infections comparing SC with RS (45.4% vs. 19.3%; p < .001). In a Cox regression model adjusting for confounders, there was no difference in five year survival comparing SC vs. RS (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 -1.5).Conclusion: In this national AGI cohort, there was no mortality difference comparing SC and RS for AGI when adjusting for comorbidities. Presence of GEF probably negatively impacts survival outcomes of SC patients. Rates of recurrent infection remain high for SC treated patients.
|
|
3. |
- Hannsberger, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
The value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in the management of infective native aortic aneurysms
- 2021
-
In: Vascular. - : Sage Publications. - 1708-5381 .- 1708-539X. ; 29:6, s. 801-807
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective The objective of this systematic literature review was to explore the value of positron emission tomography combined with low-dose computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET-CT) in the diagnostics of infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA). Methods A systematic literature review was performed using the search terms mycotic- and infected aortic aneurysms in Medline and Sciencedirect databases, published between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2020. Using the PRISMA statement, articles were scrutinized according to a predefined protocol including: timing of 18F-FDG-PET-CT examination, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), additional findings on examination, and findings on repeated scanning of 18F-FDG-PET-CT. Results Four studies were included in the analysis, comprising a total of 11 patients. Two studies were single case reports, and two were small case series, all were graded to be of low quality with high risk of bias. All patients were examined with a preoperative 18F-FDG-PET-CT, and 10 (91%) had increased 18F-FDG uptakes. The median SUVmax value was 6.53, range 4.46-9.23. The mean duration of antibiotic therapy prior to 18F-FDG-PET-CT was not known. Two patients were examined with repeated 18F-FDG-PET-CT examinations after treatment, where a decrease in SUVmax values could be demonstrated after successful treatment. Conclusion The literature on 18F-FDF-PET/CT for diagnosing infective native aortic aneurysms is scarce. However, there might be a role for 18F-FDF-PET/CT in the management of the disease, in particular for patients with clinical suspicion of INAA without convincing findings on CT. SUVmax values ranging from 4.5 to 6.5 could be guiding and suggestive of metabolic activity in agreement of INAA. However, further conclusions on its usefulness, robustness and specific SUVmax values are premature, and a definitive cut-off value is probably not attainable.
|
|
4. |
- Jönsson, Adam, et al.
(author)
-
HIV-associated Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms
- 2023
-
In: APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0903-4641. ; 131:1, s. 3-12
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundHIV-associated infective native aortic aneurysms (INAA) constitute a subcategory of the disease INAA. This is a very rare group of patients.ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic literature review was to compile a description of patient characteristics with HIV-associated INAA.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed using the search terms HIV and aortic aneurysm in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases, on articles published between 1981-2022. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, articles were scrutinised according to a predefined protocol including age, sex, co-morbidities, microbiological pathogens, CD4-count, HIV/AIDS state, aortic segment involved, treatment and outcome.ResultsThirty-three studies, all case reports with a total of 39 patients, were included. The median age was 48 years (range 27-79), most were male n=35 (90%), and the median follow-up was n=6 months (range 0-63). Cardiovascular comorbidity was present in n=1 (3%), median CD4-count was 216 (range 6-1236), and n=12 (31%) had AIDS. The most common microbiological pathogens were Treponema pallidum, n=12 (31%), Salmonella spp. n=10 (26%), Mycobacterium species n=5 (12%), and Staphylococcal spp. n=5 (13%). The HIV-associated INAAs were localized in the abdominal aorta n=32 (82%), in the thoracic aorta n=5 (13%) and in the thoraco-abdominal aorta n=2 (5%). Open surgery was performed in n=23 (59%) patients, endovascular aortic repair n=6 (15%), and n=7 (18%) did not receive surgery. Infection-related complications were reported in n=2 (7%) patients, both with postoperative development of fatal sepsis.ConclusionPatients with HIV-associated INAAs, were younger, had lower rate of cardiovascular comorbidity, demonstrated low CD4-counts as a measure of immunosuppression, and demonstrated diverse microbiological pathogens compared with other INAAs. Treponema Pallidum and Mycobacterium spp. were common pathogens, which are very rare microbiological pathogens in other INAAs.
|
|
5. |
- Ljungquist, Oskar, et al.
(author)
-
Conservative Management First Strategy in Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections
- 2023
-
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2165 .- 1078-5884. ; 65:6, s. 896-904
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe and present the outcomes of a specific treatment protocol for aortic vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEIs) without explantation of the infected graft.METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational single centre cohort study carried out between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary hospital. An aortic VGEI was defined according to the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria. Fitness for graft excision was assessed by a multidisciplinary team and included an evaluation of the patient's general condition, septic status, and anatomical complexity. Antimicrobial treatments were individualised. The primary outcome was survival at the last available follow up; secondary outcomes were antimicrobial treatment duration, infection eradication, treatment failure despite antimicrobial treatment, and the development of aortic fistulation.RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study, of whom 42 (84%) had previous endovascular repair. Median patient age was 72 years (range 51 - 82 years) and median duration of treatment with antimicrobials was 18 months (range 1 - 164 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the 30 day survival rate to be 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96 - 100), the one year survival rate to be 88% (95% CI 83.4 - 92.6), and the three year survival rate to be 79% (95% CI 72.7 - 84.7). Twenty-four (48%) patients were able to discontinue antibiotic treatment after a median of 16 months (range 4 - 81 months). When categorised according to infected graft location, deaths occurred in four (40%) patients with thoracic, four (40%) with paravisceral, seven (30%) with infrarenal VGEIs, and in one (25%) patient with an aorto-iliac VGEI; no (0%) patient with a thoraco-abdominal VGEI died.CONCLUSION: Identifying the microbiological aetiology in patients with aortic VGEI enables individualised, specific antibiotic treatment, which may be useful in patients with a VGEI excluded from surgery. This single centre retrospective analysis of patients with VGEIs without fistula selected for conservative treatment suggests that conservative management of aortic VGEIs with targeted antibiotic therapy without graft excision is potentially effective, and that antimicrobial treatment will not necessarily be needed indefinitely.
|
|
6. |
- Ljungquist, Oskar, et al.
(author)
-
Guided Aspiration for Determining the Microbiological Aetiology of Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections
- 2021
-
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2165 .- 1078-5884. ; 62:6, s. 935-943
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- ObjectiveOpen and endovascular aortic repair may be complicated by aortic vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Confirming the microbiological aetiology is a key element in providing the best available treatment to patients with a VGEI. The primary aim of this study was to describe the technique of direct aneurysm sac guided aspiration (DASGA) in determining the microbiological aetiology in a cohort of patients with VGEIs, and to report its diagnostic value.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational single centre study performed between the years 2011 to 2020 in Malmö, Sweden. Patients with a suspected aortic VGEI, where a DASGA was performed at the Vascular Centre, were included in the study.ResultsIn total, 31 guided aspirations were performed in 27 patients (25 male [93%]; median age 77 years [range 57 – 82 years]). The combination of culture and 16S rRNA/18S rRNA gave a microbial aetiology in 25/31 (81%) DASGAs. Importantly, excluding three cases where infection was ruled out, this rate increases up to 89%. A polymicrobial aetiology was found in six (24 %) cases. The most common bacteria found were Cutibacterium spp. (n = 8) and Listeria monocytogenes (n = 4). In total, the dominant aetiology could be further characterised into normal gut flora (n = 12; 48%) or skin commensals (n = 8; 32%). No patients had persistent morbidity related to the DASGA.ConclusionDASGA can be used successfully to determine the microbiological aetiology of open and endovascular graft infections. This method appears to be safe, with a high success rate for confirming the microbiological aetiology of VGEIs, particularly if standard culturing methods are combined with 16S rRNA/18S rRNA. Finding the causative microbial aetiology is crucial, and in the vast majority of cases translumbar puncture can be used without serious complications.
|
|
7. |
- Schaffer, Clara, et al.
(author)
-
Abdominal-based adipocutaneous advancement flap for reconstructing inguinal defects with contraindications to standard reconstructive approaches : a simple and safe salvage reconstructive option
- 2021
-
In: ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS. - : KOREAN SOC PLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY. - 2234-6163 .- 2234-6171. ; 48:4, s. 395-403
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Groin wounds occurring after vascular surgical site infection, oncologic resection, or occasionally orthopedic surgery and trauma may represent a surgical challenge. Reconstruction of these defects by the usual workhorse flaps may be contraindicated following previous surgery and in patients with lower limb lymphedema or extreme morbidity.Methods: This study included 15 consecutive patients presenting with inguinal wounds after vascular or general surgery that required debridement and soft tissue coverage. All cases had absolute or relative contraindications to conventional reconstructive techniques, including a compromised deep femoral artery network, limb lymphedema, scarring of potential flap harvesting sites, or poor overall condition. Abdominal adipocutaneous excess enabled the performance of adipocutaneous advancement flaps in an abdominoplasty-like fashion. Immediate and long-term outcomes were analyzed.Results: Soft tissue coverage was effective in all cases. Two patients required re-intervention due to flap-related complications (venous congestion and partial flap necrosis). All patients fully recovered over a mean +/- standard deviation follow-up of 2.4 +/- 1.5 years.Conclusions: Abdominal flaps can be an effective and simple alternative technique for inguinal coverage with reproducible outcomes. In our experience, the main indications are a compromised deep femoral artery network and poor thigh tissue quality. Relative contraindications, such as previous open abdominal surgery, should be considered.
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|