| 1. |
- Hommel, Ami, et al.
(author)
-
Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events : A multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool
- 2020
-
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. - : Elsevier. - 0020-7489 .- 1873-491X. ; 102, s. 1-9
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: For decades, patient safety has been recognized as a critical global healthcare issue. However, there is a gap of knowledge of all types of adverse events sensitive to nursing care within hospitals in general and within orthopaedic care specifically. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive adverse events following elective or acute hip arthroplasty at a national level. Design: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Outcome variables: Nursing-sensitive adverse events, preventability, severity and length of stay. Methods: All patients, 18 years or older, who had undergone an elective (degenerative joint disease) or acute (fractures) hemi or total hip arthroplasty surgery at 24 hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Retrospective reviews of weighted samples of 1998 randomly selected patient records were carried out using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The patients were followed for readmissions up to 90 days postoperatively throughout the whole country regardless of index hospital. Results: A total of 1150 nursing-sensitive adverse events were identified in 728 (36.4%) of patient records, and 943 (82.0%) of the adverse events were judged preventable in the study cohort. The adjusted cumulative incidence regarding nursing-sensitive adverse events for the study population was 18.8%. The most common nursing-sensitive adverse event types were different kinds of healthcare-associated infections (40.9%) and pressure ulcers (16.5%). Significantly higher proportions of nursing-sensitive adverse events were found among female patients compared to male, p < 0.001, and patients with acute admissions compared to elective patients, p < 0.001. Almost half (48.5%) of the adverse events were temporary and of a less severe nature. On the other hand, 592 adverse events were estimated to have contributed to 3351 extra hospital days. Conclusions: This study shows the magnitude of nursing-sensitive adverse events. We found that nursing-sensitive adverse events were common, in most cases deemed preventable and were associated with different kinds of adverse events and levels of severity in orthopaedic care. Registered nurses play a vital role within the interdisciplinary team as they are the largest group of healthcare professionals, work 24/7 and spend much time at the bedside with patients. Therefore, nursing leadership at all hospital levels must assume responsibility for patient safety and authorize bedside registered nurses to deliver high-quality and sustainable care to patients. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kelly-Pettersson, Paula, et al.
(author)
-
The influence of depression on patient-reported outcomes for hip-fracture patients 1 year after surgery : a prospective cohort study.
- 2020
-
In: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1594-0667 .- 1720-8319. ; 32:2, s. 247-255
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Depression is common in elderly hip-fracture patients and together with cognitive impairment is associated with increased risk of mortality.AIM: We aimed to examine the influence depression has on patient-reported outcome up to 1 year after acute hip fracture.METHODS: 162 hip-fracture patients participated in the prospective observational cohort study and were followed up at baseline, and 3 and 12 months using patient-reported outcome scores. Patients with cognitive impairment were excluded. Depression was defined as a score ≥ 8 on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS D), having a diagnosis of depression or being treated with anti-depressant medication. Hip function was assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), EQ-5D was used to assess health status and Quality of life, and the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PRNS) was used to assess pain levels. A linear regression model adjusted for group, age, sex, and ASA class was used to identify risk factors for functional outcome 12 months after fracture.RESULTS: 35 patients were included in the depression group versus 127 in the control group. No statistical differences were found in the demographic data (age, sex, ASA class, fracture type, operation method, living situation, activities of daily living ADL and clinical pathway) between the groups. In the regression model, we found no correlation between depression and the patient-reported outcome.CONCLUSION: In young elderly hip fracture patients without cognitive dysfunction, depression may not be of major importance for the rehabilitation of hip function in the short term.
|
|
| 3. |
- Magnéli, Martin, et al.
(author)
-
Only 8% of major preventable adverse events after hip arthroplasty are filed as claims : a Swedish multi-center cohort study on 1,998 patients
- 2020
-
In: Acta Orthopaedica. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1745-3674 .- 1745-3682. ; 91:1, s. 20-25
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background and purpose — Hip arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgeries in Sweden, and the rate of adverse events (AEs) is fairly high. All patients in publicly financed healthcare in Sweden are insured by the Mutual Insurance Company of Swedish County Councils (Löf). We assessed the proportion of patients that sustained a major preventable AE and filed an AE claim to Löf. Patients and methods — We performed retrospective record review using the Global Trigger Tool to identify AEs in a Swedish multi-center cohort consisting of 1,998 patients with a total or hemi hip arthroplasty. We compared the major preventable AEs with all patient-reported claims to Löf from the same cohort and calculated the proportion of filed claims. Results — We found 1,066 major preventable AEs in 744 patients. Löf received 62 claims for these AEs, resulting in a claim proportion of 8%. 58 of the 62 claims were accepted by Löf and received compensation. The claim proportion was 13% for the elective patients and 0.3% for the acute patients. The most common AE for filing a claim was periprosthetic joint infection; of the 150 infections found 37 were claimed. Interpretation — The proportion of filed claims for major preventable AEs is very low, even for obvious and serious AEs such as periprosthetic joint infection.
|
|
| 4. |
- Pettersson, Paula Kelly, et al.
(author)
-
The identification of adverse events in hip fracture patients using the Global Trigger Tool : A prospective observational cohort study.
- 2020
-
In: International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. - : Elsevier BV. - 1878-1241 .- 1878-1292.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture is common in the elderly and is associated with high comorbidity, mortality and complication rates. There has been an increase in the investigation of healthcare-related adverse events (AEs) in some patient groups but there is limited knowledge about hip fracture patients. The aim was to explore the incidence, preventability and nature of AEs in hip fracture patients.METHODS: One hundred and sixty three hip fracture patients participated. A record review was conducted of prospectively collected data using Global Trigger Tool methodology to identify AEs up to 90 days after surgery.RESULTS: Sixty two (38.0%) of 163 patients had at least one AE (range 1-7). One hundred and two AEs were identified and 62 (60.8%) were deemed preventable. Healthcare-associated infections e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers were common. AEs were more common in older patients and those with pre-existing health conditions. Fifty eight (56.9%) AEs caused temporary harm and 4 (3.9%) contributed to patient death.CONCLUSION: AEs are common in hip fracture patients and most are preventable. If the focus is on improving healthcare for these patients, we should be concentrating our efforts on reducing the number of these preventable AEs, with a particular emphasis on improving the care of older patients with pre-existing health conditions.
|
|
