1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Jacquet, Jennifer, et al.
(författare)
-
Support US OCTOPUS Act to keep octopuses wild.
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Science (New York, N.Y.). - 1095-9203. ; 385:6710, s. 721-722
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Commercial octopus farming is incapable of meeting welfare requirements, unsustainable, and unnecessary for sustenance. Although no commercial octopus farms currently exist, a Spanish seafood company plans to build one in the Canary Islands for Octopus vulgaris. In March, the US state of Washington banned octopus farming. Similar legislation has been introduced in California and Hawai‘i . Now, the federal government is proposing action. The US Congress should pass the OCTOPUS Act, a federal law that would prohibit commercial octopus aquaculture in the United States and the import of commercially farmed octopus or octopus products.
|
|
4. |
- Zuber, S., et al.
(författare)
-
What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Utilitas. - : Cambridge University Press. - 0953-8208 .- 1741-6183. ; 33:4, s. 379-383
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Repugnant Conclusion is an implication of some approaches to population ethics. It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living. (Parfit 1984: 388) Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.
|
|