SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Turner Maria L.) "

Search: WFRF:(Turner Maria L.)

  • Result 1-10 of 42
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • 2017
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Schael, S., et al. (author)
  • Electroweak measurements in electron positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP
  • 2013
  • In: Physics Reports. - : Elsevier BV. - 0370-1573 .- 1873-6270. ; 532:4, s. 119-244
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Electroweak measurements performed with data taken at the electron positron collider LEP at CERN from 1995 to 2000 are reported. The combined data set considered in this report corresponds to a total luminosity of about 3 fb(-1) collected by the four LEP experiments ALEPH, DELPHI, 13 and OPAL, at centre-of-mass energies ranging from 130 GeV to 209 GeV. Combining the published results of the four LEP experiments, the measurements include total and differential cross-sections in photon-pair, fermion-pair and four-fermion production, the latter resulting from both double-resonant WW and ZZ production as well as singly resonant production. Total and differential cross-sections are measured precisely, providing a stringent test of the Standard Model at centre-of-mass energies never explored before in electron positron collisions. Final-state interaction effects in four-fermion production, such as those arising from colour reconnection and Bose Einstein correlations between the two W decay systems arising in WW production, are searched for and upper limits on the strength of possible effects are obtained. The data are used to determine fundamental properties of the W boson and the electroweak theory. Among others, the mass and width of the W boson, m(w) and Gamma(w), the branching fraction of W decays to hadrons, B(W -> had), and the trilinear gauge-boson self-couplings g(1)(Z), K-gamma and lambda(gamma), are determined to be: m(w) = 80.376 +/- 0.033 GeV Gamma(w) = 2.195 +/- 0.083 GeV B(W -> had) = 67.41 +/- 0.27% g(1)(Z) = 0.984(-0.020)(+0.018) K-gamma - 0.982 +/- 0.042 lambda(gamma) = 0.022 +/- 0.019. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  •  
8.
  • Murari, A., et al. (author)
  • A control oriented strategy of disruption prediction to avoid the configuration collapse of tokamak reactors
  • 2024
  • In: Nature Communications. - 2041-1723 .- 2041-1723. ; 15:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The objective of thermonuclear fusion consists of producing electricity from the coalescence of light nuclei in high temperature plasmas. The most promising route to fusion envisages the confinement of such plasmas with magnetic fields, whose most studied configuration is the tokamak. Disruptions are catastrophic collapses affecting all tokamak devices and one of the main potential showstoppers on the route to a commercial reactor. In this work we report how, deploying innovative analysis methods on thousands of JET experiments covering the isotopic compositions from hydrogen to full tritium and including the major D-T campaign, the nature of the various forms of collapse is investigated in all phases of the discharges. An original approach to proximity detection has been developed, which allows determining both the probability of and the time interval remaining before an incoming disruption, with adaptive, from scratch, real time compatible techniques. The results indicate that physics based prediction and control tools can be developed, to deploy realistic strategies of disruption avoidance and prevention, meeting the requirements of the next generation of devices.
  •  
9.
  • Klionsky, Daniel J., et al. (author)
  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
  • 2012
  • In: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 42
Type of publication
journal article (35)
research review (5)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (40)
Author/Editor
Lee, C. (10)
Yang, Y. (9)
Jones, C (9)
Ali, M (8)
Edwards, J (8)
Jones, T. (8)
show more...
George, R (8)
Silva, J. (7)
Walker, R. (7)
Garcia, J. (7)
Fowler, C. (7)
Johnson, R (7)
Smith, N. (7)
Simpson, J (7)
Craven, R (7)
Clarkson, R (7)
Chen, S. (6)
Glimelius, Bengt (6)
Smedby, Karin E. (6)
Thomas, J. (6)
Adami, Hans Olov (6)
Melbye, Mads (6)
Ng, S (6)
Ahmed, A (6)
Berndt, Sonja I (6)
Chanock, Stephen J (6)
Giles, Graham G (6)
Offit, Kenneth (6)
Spinelli, John J. (6)
Teras, Lauren R. (6)
Kraft, Peter (6)
Diver, W Ryan (6)
Hjalgrim, Henrik (6)
Brennan, Paul (6)
Bracci, Paige M (6)
Holly, Elizabeth A (6)
Hartge, Patricia (6)
Foretova, Lenka (6)
Becker, Nikolaus (6)
Rothman, Nathaniel (6)
Lan, Qing (6)
McKay, James (6)
Conde, Lucia (6)
Skibola, Christine F ... (6)
Cerhan, James R. (6)
Wang, Sophia S. (6)
Benavente, Yolanda (6)
Birmann, Brenda M. (6)
Clavel, Jacqueline (6)
Cozen, Wendy (6)
show less...
University
Karolinska Institutet (24)
Uppsala University (16)
Lund University (12)
Umeå University (10)
University of Gothenburg (8)
Stockholm University (5)
show more...
Linköping University (5)
Chalmers University of Technology (4)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (4)
Royal Institute of Technology (3)
Örebro University (3)
Malmö University (1)
Linnaeus University (1)
show less...
Language
English (42)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Medical and Health Sciences (24)
Natural sciences (14)
Engineering and Technology (4)
Agricultural Sciences (1)
Social Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view