| 1. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
High-resolution computed tomography with 16-row MDCT: A comparison regarding visibility and motion artifacts of dose-modulated thin slices and "step and shoot" images
- 2008
-
In: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 49:7, s. 755-760
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Dose modulation can be used to reduce the radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) examinations while still obtaining the necessary diagnostic image quality. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) provides the possibility of simultaneous reconstruction of thin and thick slices from the same raw data. Purpose: To compare thin slices reconstructed from a dose-modulated helical acquisition and conventional high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images taken with the “step and shoot” technique in terms of visibility and motion artifacts, in order to investigate the possibility of excluding “step and shoot” acquisition from the HRCT examination. Material and Methods: Twenty patients were examined by a dose-modulated helical acquisition, “MDCT smart mA,” and by a noncontiguous cross-sectional high-resolution 16-row MDCT examination, “MDCT step and shoot.” Images from four anatomical levels, made anonymous regarding identity and technical data, were analyzed in random order by four thoracic radiologists. Results: “MDCT smart mA” was worse than “MDCT step and shoot” in terms of visibility. Concerning motion artifacts, “MDCT smart mA” was better than “MDCT step and shoot.” Conclusion: Thin images reconstructed from a dose-modulated 16-row helical MDCT acquisition (“MDCT smart mA”), as performed in our study, do not provide sufficient image quality regarding visibility compared to the “MDCT step and shoot” technique for the latter technique to be excluded from the HRCT examination.
|
|
| 2. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
High-Resolution Computed Tomography with Single-Slice Computed Tomography and 16-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparison Regarding Visibility and Motion Artifacts
- 2007
-
In: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 48:9, s. 956-961
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: High-resolution computed tomography is the image procedure of choice in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. Multidetector-row computed tomography provides the possibility of simultaneous reconstruction of thin and thick slices from the same raw data, acquired from one single series. Thus, it may be tempting to exclude the step-and-shoot series. Purpose: To compare high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT step-and-shoot) from single-slice CT (SSCT) and 16-channel multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of visibility and motion artifacts, and to investigate whether thin images reconstructed from helical MDCT are equal to or better than conventional HRCT by SSCT in terms of visibility and motion artifacts. Material and Methods: 20 patients underwent HRCT step-and-shoot by SSCT (SSCT step-and-shoot) and MDCT (MDCT step-and-shoot), and a helical MDCT acquisition (MDCT helical). Images from four anatomical levels were analyzed in random order regarding visibility and motion artifacts. Results: Visibility using MDCT step-and-shoot was significantly better than or equal to SSCT step-and-shoot for segmental bronchi and fissures, but not for subsegmental bronchi. For MDCT helical, visibility was equal to or better than SSCT step-and-shoot for segmental bronchi, but not for fissures and subsegmental bronchi. Concerning motion artifacts, MDCT step-and-shoot and MDCT helical were significantly better than or equal to SSCT step-and-shoot. Conclusion: The image quality (accounting for motion artifacts and visibility) of SSCT step-and-shoot and MDCT step-and-shoot is comparable. The visibility of anatomic structures in images from MDCT helical is inferior to HRCT step-and-shoot.
|
|
| 3. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
Ny CT – ny HRCT?
- 2005
-
In: Röntgenveckan 2005, 19-23 september 2005, Malmö.
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 4. |
- Båth, Magnus, 1974, et al.
(author)
-
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise.
- 2005
-
In: Radiation protection dosimetry. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0144-8420 .- 1742-3406. ; 114:1-3, s. 109-13
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The image background resulting from imaged anatomy can be divided into those components that are meaningful to the observers, in the sense that they are recognised as separate structures, and those that are not. These latter components (reffered to as anatomical noise) can be removed using a method developed within the RADIUS group. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the removal of the anatomical noise results in images where lung nodules with lower contrast can be detected. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was therefore conducted using two types of images: clinical chest images and chest images in which the anatomical noise had been removed. Simulated designer nodules with a full-width-at-fifth-maximum of 10 mm but with varying contrast were added to the images. The contrast needed to obtain an area under the ROC curve of 0.80, C0.8, was used as a measure of detectability (a low value of C0.8 represents a high detectability). Five regions of the chest X ray were investigated and it was found that in all regions the removal of anatomical noise led to images with lower C0.8 than the original images. On average, C0.8 was 20% higher in the original images, ranging from 7% (the lateral pulmonary regions) to 41% (the upper mediastinal regions).
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Johnsson, Åse (Allansdotter), 1966, et al.
(author)
-
Nodule detection by chest tomosynthesis
- 2009
-
In: 2nd World Congress of Thoracic Imaging and Diagnosis in Chest Disease, 30 May-2 June 2009, Valencia, Spain.
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 8. |
- Olin, Anna-Carin, 1960, et al.
(author)
-
Single breath N2-test and exhaled nitric oxide in men.
- 2006
-
In: Respiratory medicine. - : Elsevier BV. - 0954-6111. ; 100:6, s. 1013-9
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The N(2) slope is an index of inhomogeneous distribution of ventilation and has been suggested to be suited for early testing of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and the N(2) slope in a random population of smoking and non-smoking men. Altogether 57 subjects were included in the study, 24 never-smokers, seven ex-smokers and 26 current smokers. Subjects were examined twice, in 1995 when they regarded themselves as healthy, and in a follow-up in 2001. Spirometry, N(2) slope and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were performed in 1995 while the follow-up examination included also measurement of FENO. The FENO value was significantly lower and the N(2) slope higher in current smokers. In smokers but not in never- or ex-smokers FENO was correlated to the difference in N(2) slope between 1995 and 2001 (r(s)=0.49, P=0.01). We analysed the data by multiple linear regression adjusted for smoking, mild respiratory symptoms and inhaled steroids. There were significant associations between FENO and the N(2) slope both in 1995 and in 2001. The strongest association was found to exist with the change in N(2) slope during these years. Sixteen of the subjects could be classified as having COPD, six with mild and ten with moderate COPD. There was a trend for an increase in N(2) slope with increased severity of COPD; among subjects with no COPD the N(2) slope in 2001 was 2.3% N(2)/L, and those with mild and moderate COPD had 2.5% N(2)/L and 3.9% N(2)/L, respectively (P=0.0004). No such trend was seen for FENO (17.8, 15.5 and 20.3 parts per billion (ppb), respectively, P=0.8). The results show that FENO is associated with the N(2) slope, indicating that FENO reflects inflammatory changes in the peripheral airways of both non-smoking and smoking subjects.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(author)
-
Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases.
- 2008
-
In: Radiology. - : Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). - 1527-1315 .- 0033-8419. ; 249:3, s. 1034-1041
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To compare chest tomosynthesis with chest radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules by using multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Regional Ethical Review Board approved this study, and all participants gave informed consent. Four thoracic radiologists acted as observers in a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study conducted in 42 patients with and 47 patients without pulmonary nodules examined with chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography. Multidetector CT served as reference method. The observers marked suspected nodules on the images by using a four-point rating scale for the confidence of presence. The JAFROC figure of merit was used as the measure of detectability. The number of lesion localizations relative to the total number of lesions (lesion localization fraction [LLF]) and the number of nonlesion localizations relative to the total number of cases (nonlesion localization fraction [NLF]) were determined. RESULTS: Performance of chest tomosynthesis was significantly better than that of chest radiography with regard to detectability (F statistic = 32.7, df = 1, 34.8, P < .0001). For tomosynthesis, the LLF for the smallest nodules (< or = 4 mm) was 0.39 and increased with an increase in size to an LLF for the largest nodules (> 8 mm) of 0.83. The LLF for radiography was small, except for the largest nodules, for which it was 0.52. In total, the LLF was three times higher for tomosynthesis. The NLF was approximately 50% higher for tomosynthesis. CONCLUSION: For the detection of pulmonary nodules, the performance of chest tomosynthesis is better, with increased sensitivity especially for nodules smaller than 9 mm, than that of chest radiography.
|
|
