| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Weimann, A, et al.
(author)
-
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition : Surgery including organ transplantation
- 2006
-
In: Clinical Nutrition. - Edinburgh, United Kingdom : Churchill Livingstone. - 0261-5614 .- 1532-1983. ; 25:2, s. 224-44
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Enhanced recovery of patients after surgery ("ERAS") has become an important focus of perioperative management. From a metabolic and nutritional point of view, the key aspects of perioperative care include: Enteral nutrition (EN) by means of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and if necessary tube feeding (TF) offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in cases where food intake is inadequate. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of ONS and TF in surgical patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards and are based on all relevant publications since 1980. The guideline was discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. EN is indicated even in patients without obvious undernutrition, if it is anticipated that the patient will be unable to eat for more than 7 days perioperatively. It is also indicated in patients who cannot maintain oral intake above 60% of recommended intake for more than 10 days. In these situations nutritional support should be initiated without delay. Delay of surgery for preoperative EN is recommended for patients at severe nutritional risk, defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: weight loss >10-15% within 6 months, BMI<18.5 kg/m(2), Subjective Global Assessment Grade C, serum albumin <30 g/l (with no evidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction). Altogether, it is strongly recommended not to wait until severe undernutrition has developed, but to start EN therapy early, as soon as a nutritional risk becomes apparent.
|
|
| 3. |
- Braga, M., et al.
(author)
-
ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition : surgery
- 2009
-
In: Clinical Nutrition. - Edinburgh : European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. - 0261-5614 .- 1532-1983. ; 28:4, s. 378-386
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In modern surgical practice it is advisable to manage patients within an enhanced recovery protocol and thereby have them eating normal food within 1-3 days. Consequently, there is little room for routine perioperative artificial nutrition. Only a minority of patients may benefit from such therapy. These are predominantly patients who are at risk of developing complications after surgery. The main goals of perioperative nutritional support are to minimize negative protein balance by avoiding starvation, with the purpose of maintaining muscle, immune, and cognitive function and to enhance postoperative recovery. Several studies have demonstrated that 7-10 days of preoperative parenteral nutrition improves postoperative outcome in patients with severe undernutrition who cannot be adequately orally or enterally fed. Conversely, its use in well-nourished or mildly undernourished patients is associated with either no benefit or with increased morbidity. Postoperative parenteral nutrition is recommended in patients who cannot meet their caloric requirements within 7-10 days orally or enterally. In patients who require postoperative artificial nutrition, enteral feeding or a combination of enteral and supplementary parenteral feeding is the first choice. The main consideration when administering fat and carbohydrates in parenteral nutrition is not to overfeed the patient. The commonly used formula of 25 kcal/kg ideal body weight furnishes an approximate estimate of daily energy expenditure and requirements. Under conditions of severe stress requirements may approach 30 kcal/kg ideal body weights. In those patients who are unable to be fed via the enteral route after surgery, and in whom total or near total parenteral nutrition is required, a full range of vitamins and trace elements should be supplemented on a daily basis.
|
|
| 4. |
- Robinson, Yohan, et al.
(author)
-
Impaired erythropoiesis after haemorrhagic shock in mice is associated with erythroid progenitor apoptosis in vivo
- 2008
-
In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 52:5, s. 605-13
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Multiply traumatised patients often suffer from blood loss and from subsequent therapy-resistant anaemia, possibly mediated by apoptosis, necrosis, or humoral factors. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms were investigated in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood in a murine resuscitated haemorrhagic shock (HS) model. METHODS: In healthy male mice, pressure-controlled HS was induced for 60 min. The BM was analysed for Annexin-V, 7-amino-actinomycin D, apoptotic enzymes (caspases-3/7, -8, and -9), expression of death receptors (CD120a, CD95), mitochondrial proteins (Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-x), as well as erythropoietin (EPO) receptor (EPO-R). Blood cell count, peripheral EPO, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha response were additionally monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-four and 72 h after HS, EPO and EPO-R were strongly up-regulated in peripheral blood and BM, respectively. Decreasing numbers of erythroid progenitors in BM after HS correlated with significant apoptotic changes confirmed by increased caspases-3/7, -8, -9 activity in total BM, death receptor CD95 and CD120a expression on erythroid progenitors, and down-regulated mitochondrial Bcl-2 expression in total BM. Erythroid progenitors in peripheral blood were found to be increased after 72 h. CONCLUSION: Despite the massive EPO response and up-regulation of EPO-R, BM erythroblasts (EBs) decreased. This could be due to deficient maturation of erythroid progenitors. Furthermore, the increased intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis activation suggests programmed death of erythroid progenitors. We propose that both apoptosis and negatively regulated erythropoiesis contribute to BM dysfunction, while erythroid progenitor egress plays an additional role.
|
|
