| 1. |
- Barendregt, Wolmet, et al.
(author)
-
Teaching Values in Design in Higher Education : Towards a Curriculum Compass
- 2020
-
In: <em>Paradigm Shifts in ICT Ethics: Societal Challenges in the Smart Society</em>. - : Universidad de la Rioja. - 9788409202720 ; , s. 214-216
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Given that there are so many potential resources out there, we need to carefully select and present materials and activities in such a way that it can be easily accessed and used by teachers working across multiple disciplines (eg industrial design, computer science, educational technology), engaging with students on different levels (eg bachelor and master), and dealing with different sets of constraints (eg, time, location, person power, budget). Currently, we are working on the creation of a curriculum compass, a structural guidance that can help organize teaching activities together with relevant materials and tools, by employing educational design patterns as development framework (Goodyear, 2005; Mor & Winthers, 2008). For this structure, we have identified three main pillars for teaching about values in design: 1) Ethics and Human Values, 2) People and Stakeholders, and 3) Technology and Context. Building on these three pillars, we aim to further structure how a learner's understanding of values develops from a simple to more complex level. To do so, we are drawing from established taxonomies of learning, such as the SOLO taxonomy (Biggs & Collis, 1982) and the Bloom taxonomy (Bloom, 1956) to address different levels of competences. Finally, our overarching goal is to make sure that our students become caring and responsible designers of the future society in a holistic and grounded manner. To this end, our project not only focuses on developing conceptual knowledge about values and ethics and gaining practical skills to design in a value-sensitive way, but more importantly, on becoming a reflective and responsible designer.
|
|
| 2. |
- Eriksson, Eva, et al.
(author)
-
In‐Action Value Framework : Participatory Design with Values
- 2020
-
In: Position paper at 16th Participatory Design Conference: Participation(s) Otherwise<em>, </em>Conference workshop: Computing Professionals for Social Responsibility: The Past, Present and Future Values of Participatory.. - Manizales, Colombia.
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Similar to the In‐Action Ethics framework (Frauenberger et al, 2017), we hereby call for an In‐Action Value framework that we can draw on as educators, researchers and practitioners within participatory design. While the In‐Action Ethics framework links anticipatory ethics with the practice of HCI research, an In‐ Action Value framework would complement more formal approaches that professional organizations develop, e.g. standards and codes of conduct (ACM, 2018; IEEE, 2019a; IEEE, 2019b; ISO, 2019), with a responsible participatory design practice. An In‐Action Value framework could help to conceptualize skillful practice and cultivate a community of practice. Also, in order to support educators of the next generation of practitioners and researchers within participatory design to not only be sensitive to values, but also to dare handling uncomfortable value conflicts, this In‐Action Value framework could be structured around illustrative examples of progression in participatory design with values.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nilsson, Elisabet M., Senior lecturer in interaction design, 1972-, et al.
(author)
-
The Values Clustering Teaching Activity : A Case Study on Two Teachers’ Appropriations of Open Educational Resources for Teaching Values in Design
- 2020
-
In: Proceedings of <em>the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction </em>. - New York, NY, USA : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). - 9781450375795
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Currently, we see an increased focus on the social and environ-mental responsibilities of designers when designing technologies.There are however few academic examples describing how to teachstudents to become responsible designers and engineers who areattentive to values in design. We are therefore developing teach-ing activities as open educational resources for teaching valuesin design to students in different kinds of engineering and designcourses and programs. The activities address values in differentphases of the design process. This case study article reports on theappropriation of a teaching activity by two university teachers. Theaim is to provide the reader with an insight into how a teachingactivity that we have developed can be appropriated in differenteducational settings, what the teachers’ perceived effectiveness ofthis activity is, and what kind of adaptations individual teachersmay need to make to fit them into their particular course.
|
|
| 4. |
- Yoo, Daisy, et al.
(author)
-
Computational Alternatives Vignettes for Place- and Activity-Centered Digital Services in Public Libraries
- 2020
-
In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. - New York, NY, USA : ACM.
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We investigate how to design community technologies for public events. We do so with a focus on technologies that give rise to new forms of participation and knowledge co-production in public libraries. Specifically, we deployed a digital service at a major public library during its four-week creative workshop series. The system offered an alternative way for people to work together as a community, to go beyond achieving individual goals, and to contribute to the achievement of public goals (e.g., building community bookshelves). We report on how the system has reconfigured physical spaces and afforded new social practices in the library. We propose Computational Alternatives as a fruitful approach for gaining situated, nuanced insights into a technology's possible adoption. We offer key insights in the form of computational alternatives vignettes - grounded stories that encapsulate sociotechnical implications of technology, pointing to plausible alternative futures.
|
|
