SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Zerdes Ioannis) srt2:(2019)"

Search: WFRF:(Zerdes Ioannis) > (2019)

  • Result 1-2 of 2
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Matikas, Alexios, et al. (author)
  • Prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer : systematic review and meta-analysis of immunohistochemistry and pooled analysis of transcriptomic data
  • 2019
  • In: Clinical Cancer Research. - : American Association for Cancer Research. - 1078-0432 .- 1557-3265. ; 25:18, s. 5717-5726
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • PURPOSE: Conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic value of PD-L1 protein and gene expression in breast cancer.EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection were searched and data were extracted independently by two researchers. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 protein positivity in tumor cells, immune cells or both, per subtype and per antibody used; and its prognostic value for disease-free and overall survival. A pooled gene expression analysis of 39 publicly available transcriptomic datasets was also performed.RESULTS: Of the initial 4184 entries, 38 retrospective studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The overall pooled PD-L1 protein positivity rate was 24% (95% CI 15 - 33%) in tumor cells and 33% (95% CI 14 - 56%) in immune cells. PD-L1 protein expression in tumor cells was prognostic for shorter overall survival (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.07 - 2.46, p=0.02); there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 80%, pheterogeneity<0.001). In addition, higher PD-L1 gene expression predicted better survival in multivariate analysis in the entire population (HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.74 - 0.90, p<0.001 for OS) and in basal-like tumors (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.80, p<0.001 for OS), pinteraction 0.005.CONCLUSION: The largest to our knowledge meta-analysis on the subject informs on PD-L1 protein positivity rates and its prognostic value in breast cancer. Standardization is needed prior to routine implementation. PD-L1 gene expression is a promising prognostic factor, especially in basal-like BC. Discrepant prognostic information might be related to PD-L1 gene expression in the stroma.
  •  
2.
  • Matikas, Alexios, et al. (author)
  • Prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer at the protein and mRNA levels
  • 2019
  • In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 37:15
  • Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
    • Background: Conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression per immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer (BC). There is a paucity of data on the role of PD-L1 gene expression (GE).Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection were searched and data were extracted independently by two researchers. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells, immune cells or both, per subtype and per antibody used; and the prognostic value of PD-L1 positivity for DFS and OS. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I2 statistics. A pooled GE analysis of 39 publicly available transcriptomic datasets was also performed.Results: Of the initial 4184 entries, 38 retrospective studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled PD-L1 positivity rate in tumor cells was 24%, 33% in immune cells and 25% in both; highest positivity was reported with Dako 28-8 clone. PD-L1 IHC expression in tumor cells was prognostic for shorter DFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.02 – 1.83, p < 0.04) and OS (HR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.09 – 2.50, p = 0.02); there was significant heterogeneity. PD-L1 IHC expression in immune cells was associated with better DFS (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.51 – 0.73, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 – 0.73, p < 0.001) in TNBC. In addition, higher PD-L1 GE predicted better survival in multivariate analysis in the entire population (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 – 0.82, p < 0.001 for DFS and HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 – 0.93, p = 0.001 for OS) and in basal-like tumors (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 – 0.80, p = 0.001 for DFS and HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50 – 0.79, p < 0.001 for OS), pinteraction 0.124 for DFS and 0.005 for OS.Conclusions: The largest to our knowledge meta-analysis on IHC PD-L1 expression in BC informs on PD-L1 positivity rates and its prognostic value. Standardization is needed prior to routine implementation. PD-L1 GE is a promising prognostic factor, especially in basal-like BC.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-2 of 2

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view