1.
Abrahamsson, Agneta, 1951-, et al.
(author)
Välfärdssektorns projektifiering : kortsiktiga lösning av långsiktiga problem
2009
In: Kommunal ekonomi och politik. - 1402-8700. ; 13:4, s. 35-60
Journal article (peer-reviewed) abstract
In this article we use two immigrant projects to identify similarities and consequences in order to discuss and analyse outwarding collaborative projects in human service organizations as a tool for change. The heavy use of projects in a slimmed public sector originates from projects’ contradictory promises of flexibility and effectiveness in the New Public Management context. Usually projects are used as a way to get more resources to long-term needs but are seldom implemented as planned in the regular organisation. Seemingly politicians, management and civil servants preferred are focusing on the positive side of projects as means to legitimate the organizations and to bring change by targeting and steering activities. However, they tend to overlook the negative consequences from projects. Citizens and participants experience frustration and distrust. The long-term development in organizations is scarce. Projects are seldom implemented meanwhile as the problems the projects were expected to target still are remaining or even are increasing.
2.
3.
Mulder, Bernard Johann, 1965-, et al.
(author)
Sweden
2008. - 3
In: International labor and employment laws. Vol. 2 B. - Arlington : BNA Books. - 9781570187810 ; , s. 19-1-19-101
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
4.
Sandström, Annica, et al.
(author)
The performance of policy networks : the relation between network structure and network performance
2008
In: Policy Studies Journal. - 0190-292X .- 1541-0072. ; 36:4, s. 497-524
Journal article (peer-reviewed) abstract
The importance of policy networks has long been emphasized within the field of policy analysis. However, few attempts have been made to investigate the explanatory power of policy networks using the tools and theoretical concepts provided by social network analysis (SNA). This paper aims to address this need by determining if a relationship exists between the structural features of policy networks, their organizing capacities, and their performance. A comparative case study of four networks within the higher education policy sector confirms the assumption related to the existence of such a relation. It is proposed that an efficient and innovative policy network consists of a heterogeneous set of actors that are centrally and densely integrated. Furthermore, while the level of network heterogeneity is positively related to the function of resource mobilization in the process of policymaking, the level of centralized integration promotes the function of prioritizing. These findings are believed to contribute to our understanding of policymaking in contemporary society. The current paper indicates that a significant explanatory power exists in the concept of policy networks and that SNA is one way of advancing its possibilities.
