| 1. |
- Kulander, Lena, et al.
(author)
-
Soluble adhesion molecules, cytokines and cellular markers in serum in patients with acute infections
- 2001
-
In: Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. - 0036-5548 .- 1651-1980. ; 33:4, s. 290-300
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of a number of blood components such as soluble adhesion molecules, interleukin-6 (IL-6), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lysozyme in the distinction of acute bacterial and viral infections. Blood was taken from 115 acutely infected patients at admission before any treatment and in some cases on several consecutive days. 35 of the patients had a definite viral cause for their infection and 66 a bacterial cause. All variables were raised in patients with acute bacterial infections. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), sE-selectin, lysozyme and MPO were also raised in acute viral infections, but for sE-selectin and MPO less so than in bacterial infections. Evaluation of the diagnostic power showed that for MPO and IL-6 at cut-offs of 1300 microg/l and 100 ng/l, respectively, the positive predictive value was 97% and 100% and the negative predictive value 78% and 76%, respectively, in the classification of acute bacterial infections. In the distinction between viral or bacterial causes of acute infections in otherwise healthy subjects serum measurements of MPO and IL-6 are valuable tools and should be considered as diagnostic aids in the routine setting. The soluble adhesion molecules did not offer any further information in this respect.
|
|
| 2. |
- Uhnoo, I., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment and prevention of influenza : Swedish recommendations
- 2003
-
In: Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5548 .- 1651-1980. ; 35:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The introduction of the 2 neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) zanamivir and oseltamivir has offered new options for the prevention and treatment of influenza. This article summarizes a Swedish consensus guidance document on the rational use of antiviral drugs in the management of influenza virus infections. Vaccination remains the cornerstone for influenza prophylaxis. Target groups for the annual vaccination programme are the 'at-risk' individuals, i.e. elderly patients (= 65 y) and patients with chronic pulmonary disease or cardiovascular disease or other chronic diseases predisposing for a complicated course of influenza. Antiviral drugs are not a substitute for influenza vaccination, but could be used as adjuncts. Currently, 3 drugs have been approved for the treatment of influenza, including zanamivir and oseltamivir and the M2 inhibitor amantadin. Amantadin has come to very limited use, has recently been withdrawn from the Swedish market and is available only on a named patient basis. Compared with amantadin, the NAIs have clear advantages because of their broader anti-influenza activity against both type A and B, improved safety profiles and low potential for inducing drug resistance. The NAIs are therefore recommended as first options in the treatment of influenza. Oseltamivir can be taken orally, whereas zanamivir is for oral inhalation. Limited in vitro and in vivo data suggest that oseltamivir is less potent against influenza B, whereas zanamivir seems equally effective against influenza A and B. In influenza-positive healthy adults and children, treated within 48 h after symptom onset, the NAIs shorten the duration of illness by about 1 d. No significant effect on the duration of symptoms has been documented in treated at-risk patients with influenza. Owing to their limited therapeutic benefit, general use of the NAIs in the treatment of influenza is not recommended, but they can be advocated on an individualized basis for patients with severe influenza who can start therapy within 48 h of the onset of symptoms. Zanamivir is the preferred choice in a confirmed influenza B epidemic. For prevention of influenza, 2 drugs are approved, oseltamivir in adults above 12 y old and amantadin in people above 10 y old. The 70-90% protective efficacy of oseltamivir for household postexposure prophylaxis and for seasonal prophylaxis is comparable to that reported for amantadin. Oseltamivir is the preferred drug for prophylactic use. Chemoprophylaxis is targeted at high-risk groups and should be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the circumstances and the population requiring protection. A broader preventive use of oseltamivir can be advocated in at-risk groups during seasons when there is a poor antigenic match between the epidemic strains and the vaccine strains. Oseltamivir prophylaxis is otherwise recommended for patients unable to be vaccinated and for families exposed to influenza which include a member of the at-risk groups. In high-risk hospital units and in institutions caring for the elderly, oseltamivir prophylaxis, in combination with vaccination, can be recommended as measures to control an influenza outbreak.
|
|
