SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "L773:2045 4368 srt2:(2020-2024)"

Search: L773:2045 4368 > (2020-2024)

  • Result 1-17 of 17
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al. (author)
  • Core elements of serious illness conversations : an integrative systematic review
  • 2023
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: Ariadne Labs' Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), inclusive of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), has been adapted for use in a variety of settings and among diverse population groups. Explicating the core elements of serious illness conversations could support the inclusion or exclusion of certain components in future iterations of the programme and the guide.Aim: This integrative systematic review aimed to identify and describe core elements of serious illness conversations in relation to the SICP and/or SICG.Design: Literature published between 1 January 2014 and 20 March 2023 was searched in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and PubMed. All articles were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines. Data were analysed with thematic synthesis.Results: A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. Three themes were revealed: (1) serious illness conversations serve different functions that are reflected in how they are conveyed; (2) serious illness conversations endeavour to discover what matters to patients and (3) serious illness conversations seek to align what patients want in their life and care.Conclusions: Core elements of serious illness conversations included explicating the intention, framing, expectations and directions for the conversation. This encompassed discussing current and possible trajectories with a view towards uncovering matters of importance to the patient as a person. Preferences and priorities could be used to inform future preparation and recommendations. Serious illness conversation elements could be adapted and altered depending on the intended purpose of the conversation.
  •  
2.
  • Goodrose-Flores, C, et al. (author)
  • High-protein compared with standard parenteral nutrition in palliative cancer care
  • 2022
  • In: BMJ supportive & palliative care. - : BMJ. - 2045-4368 .- 2045-435X. ; 12:3, s. 332-338
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • High-protein parenteral nutrition (PN) has been developed to counteract muscle loss in patients with cancer treated with PN. Nevertheless, it is not clear if high-protein PN is as safe as standard PN in patients with palliative cancer. Our primary aim was to compare the proportion of patients with elevated liver enzymes between high-protein and standard PN in patients with palliative cancer enrolled to Medical Home Care. Our secondary aim was to compare the two treatments with regard to weight and albumin levels during treatment.MethodsMedical records from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to identify palliative cancer patients that had received PN for more than 3 weeks. Data on weight, height, albumin, liver enzymes, socioeconomic factors and dietitian consultations were collected at baseline and after 3–8 weeks of PN treatment. The odds of having elevated liver enzymes or having a maintained weight and/or stable albumin levels were calculated using logistic regression.Results20 patients treated with high-protein PN were compared with 104 patients treated with standard PN. Patients treated with high-protein PN had a significantly higher weight at follow-up compared with patients treated with standard PN (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with elevated liver enzymes (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.86), or maintained weight and/or albumin levels (OR 1.62; 95% CI 0.46 to 5.76) between high-protein and standard PN.ConclusionHigh-protein PN was as safe, and at least as effective, as standard PN to patients with palliative cancer.
  •  
3.
  • Johnson, Miriam J., et al. (author)
  • No excess harms from sustained-release morphine : A randomised placebo-controlled trial in chronic breathlessness
  • 2020
  • In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. - : BMJ. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 10:4, s. 421-428
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives: We aimed to identify and evaluate: (1) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE (worse or new since baseline)) and the subgroup of severe TEAEs in a placebo-controlled 7-day randomised trial of regular, low-dose, sustained-release oral morphine for chronic breathlessness and (2) clinical characteristics associated with TEAE. Methods: Safety analysis of trial data. Adults with chronic breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council breathlessness score ≥2) due to heart or lung disease, or cancer, not on regular opioids were eligible. Symptoms associated with opioids (TEAE of special interest) were systematically sought using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading. Other harms could be reported at any time. The relationship between characteristics and presence of ≥1 TEAE of special interest was explored using univariable logistic regression analyses. Results: 1449/5624 (26%) Adverse Events from 279 participants were TEAE of which 150/1449 (10%) were severe (CTCAE grades 3-5). 1086/5624 (75%) were events of special interest of which 41/1086 (4%) were severe. Compared with placebo, morphine was not associated with more TEAE or severe TEAE of special interest (TEAE: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.38, p=0.20; severe TEAE: OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.41, p=0.95) nor with CTCAE severity grade (χ2=4.39, p=0.50). Among the 26/150 (17%) with severe TEAEs, study withdrawal was more common in the morphine arm (18/26 (69%) morphine arm; 8/26 (30%) placebo arm). None of the severe TEAEs was a respiratory harm. Conclusions: Severe morphine-associated toxicity was uncommon and not associated with study arm. Clinical consequences were minor and self-limiting.
  •  
4.
  • Kwong, Ming Hong, et al. (author)
  • Integrative oncology in cancer care - implementation factors: mixed-methods systematic review
  • 2023
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • BackgroundIntegrative oncology (IO) appears to be beneficial to patients with cancer, but its implementation remains a challenge. Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model, this systematic review identified the barriers to and facilitators of IO implementation in conventional cancer care settings. MethodsWe searched eight electronic databases from their inception until February 2022 for qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods empirical studies reporting the implementation outcomes for IO services. Critical appraisal approach was tailored according to study types. The identified implementation barriers and facilitators were mapped onto TDF domains and the COM-B model, and subsequently onto the behavioural change wheel (BCW) for formulating behavioural change interventions. ResultsWe included 28 studies (11 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 9 mixed-methods and 2 Delphi studies) of satisfied methodological quality. The main implementation barriers were the lack of IO knowledge, the absence of funding and healthcare professionals low level of IO receptiveness. The key implementation facilitators were the dissemination of evidence on IO clinical benefits, the equipping of professionals with IO service delivery skills and the provision of a supportive organisational climate. ConclusionMultifaceted implementation strategies are needed to address the determinants influencing IO service delivery. Based on our BCW-based analysis of the included studies, the key behavioural change techniques are: (1) educating healthcare professionals about the value and application of traditional and complementary medicine; (2) ensuring access to actionable clinical evidence on IO effectiveness and safety and (3) designing guidelines on communicating traditional and complementary medicine interventions with patients and caregivers for biomedically trained doctors and nurses.
  •  
5.
  • La Russa, Mariaclelia, et al. (author)
  • Assessment of palliative care training in gynaecological oncology : a survey among European Network of Young Gynae-Oncologists (ENYGO) members
  • 2020
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • INTRODUCTION: Palliative care is an important aspect of gynaecological oncology practice. In order to successfully integrate end-of-life (EOL) care in the disease trajectory, it is crucial to incorporate systematic training in subspecialty programmes in gynaecological oncology. We aimed to evaluate the quality of training in palliative care across gynaecological oncology fellows in Europe and to provide a framework to facilitate learning opportunities.METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent to members of the European Network of Young Gynae-Oncologists (ENYGO). The survey consisted of 36 items covering six domains: respondents' characteristics, quality and quantity of teaching, curriculum achievements, observation and feedback, EOL clinical practice and attitudes about palliative care.RESULTS: Of the 703 clinicians enrolled in the study, 142 responded (20.2%). Although the majority worked in university hospitals, only half of them (47%) were in a formal subspecialty programme. The majority of respondents (60%) were trained without a mandatory rotation in palliative care units and considered the quality of EOL care teaching as 'very poor' or 'poor' (57.7%). The majority of respondents (71.6%) did not receive any supervision or feedback at the time of their first consultation on changing the goals of care.CONCLUSION: Our study underlines lack of structured teaching and supervision in palliative care contents among European fellows in gynaecological oncology. Broad education of healthcare providers is a key factor to achieve the integration of palliative care in gynaecological oncology practice. Stakeholders like European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/ENYGO play an important role to facilitate educational activities and training programmes targeting to EOL care.
  •  
6.
  • Lynøe, Niels, et al. (author)
  • Rawlsian reasoning about fairness at the end of life
  • 2023
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 13:e3, s. e1398-e1404
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to discuss end-of-life care in the context of Rawls' and Daniels' philosophy of justice. The study is based on an empirical survey of Swedish physicians who were asked whether they would want the option of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) for themselves (hereafter called own preferences), what are their attitudes towards PAS in general and whether they were prepared to prescribe PAS drugs to eligible patients. The question is to what extent the physicians' answers are impartial and consistent in a Rawlsian sense.METHODS: The underlying indicator was the physicians' own preferences. Kappa score inter-rater agreement was measured between that response and that same physician's general attitude towards allowing PAS and preparedness to prescribe PAS drugs. The coherence of provided comments and arguments were analysed using content analysis.RESULTS: Palliative care physicians are the least willing to offer PAS, and surgeons and psychiatrist the most willing. There is a discrepancy between physicians' general attitudes about allowing PAS, their own wishes to be offered PAS at the end of life and the concrete action of prescribing PAS drugs. Arguments given for not prescribing PAS by those in favour of PAS are seemingly but not truly inconsistent.CONCLUSIONS: Those supporting PAS provided impartial and consistent arguments for their stances in a Rawlsian sense, while those against PAS provided partial arguments. Two specialties, psychiatrists and palliative care physicians, were coherent in their reasoning about PAS for themselves and their willingness to prescribe the needed drugs.
  •  
7.
  • Martinsson, Lisa, et al. (author)
  • Symptom assessment in the dying : family members versus healthcare professionals
  • 2023
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives: Symptom management and support of the family members (FMs) are consideredessential aspects of palliative care. During end of life, patients are often not able to self-reportsymptoms. There is little knowledge in the literature of how healthcare professionals(HCPs) assess symptoms compared with FMs.The objective was to compare the assessment ofsymptoms and symptom relief during the final week of life between what was reported by FMsand what was reported by HCPs.Methods: Data from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care from 2021 and 2022 were usedto compare congruity of the assessments by the FMs and by HCPs regarding occurrence and reliefof three symptoms (pain, anxiety and confusion), using Cohen’s kappa.Results: A total of 1131 patients were included. The agreement between FMs and HCPs was poorfor occurrence of pain and confusion (kappa 0.25 and 0.16), but fair for occurrence of anxiety(kappa 0.30). When agreeing on a symptom being present, agreement on relief of thatsymptom was poor (kappa 0.04 for pain, 0.10 for anxiety and 0.01 for confusion). The trendwas that HCPs more often rated occurrence of pain and anxiety, less often occurrence ofconfusion and more often complete symptom relief compared with the FMs.Conclusions: The views of FMs and HCPs of the patients’ symptoms differ in the end-of-life context, but both report important information and their symptom assessments should beconsidered both together and individually. More communication between HCPs and FMs couldprobably bridge some of these differences.
  •  
8.
  • Nilsson, Stefan, 1972, et al. (author)
  • Paediatric palliative care: a systematic review.
  • 2020
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ. - 2045-4368 .- 2045-435X. ; 10:2
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • To review literature relating to evidence, context and facilitation to describe knowledge translation in paediatric palliative care. Paediatric palliative care requires competences including both paediatric specialists as well as services that are developed for this purpose, and there is a need to facilitate paediatric palliative care knowledge translation. Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services (PARiHS) is a framework for knowledge translation, which highlights the relationships between evidence, context and facilitation. PARiHS framework has been revised and updated in a new version called i-PARiHS.The electronic databases AgeLine, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus were searched. Papers included were limited to English and Swedish publications and restricted to publications dated between 1993 and August 2019. All types of observational and experimental studies using any research design were included.Thirty-eight articles were included and there was a common vision about how and when palliative care should be offered to children. The i-PARiHS was used as a lens to describe the knowledge translation in paediatric palliative care. Symptom relief was the most commonly described evidence-based strategy, and the hospital environment was the most commonly described context. Different types of education were the most commonly used strategies to facilitate knowledge translation. The results mainly focused on increasing knowledge of palliative care in paediatric care. To sum up, the results report strategies to achieve knowledge translation of paediatric palliative care, and these can be interpreted as a guideline for how this process can be facilitated.CRD42018100663.
  •  
9.
  • O'Sullivan, Anna, et al. (author)
  • Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members : A cross-sectional survey
  • 2024
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES: The aim was: (1) to investigate preferred place for end-of-life care and death for bereaved family members who had recently lost a person with advanced illness and (2) to investigate associations between bereaved family members' preferences and individual characteristics, health-related quality of life, as well as associations with their perception of the quality of care that the ill person had received, the ill person's preferred place of death and involvement in decision-making about care.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members, employing descriptive statistics and multinominal logistic regression analyses.RESULTS: Of the 485 participants, 70.7% were women, 36.1% were ≥70 years old, 34.5% were partners and 51.8% were children of the deceased. Of the bereaved family members, 52% preferred home for place of end-of-life care and 43% for place of death. A higher likelihood of preferring inpatient palliative care was associated with being female and having higher education, whereas a lower likelihood of preferring a nursing home for the place of care and death was associated with higher secondary or higher education. Partners were more likely to prefer hospital for place of care and nursing home for place of death.CONCLUSIONS: Home was the most preferred place for end-of-life care and death. Bereaved people's experiences of end-of-life care may impact their preferences, especially if they had a close relationship, such as a partner who had a higher preference for nursing home and hospital care. Conversations about preferences for the place of care and death considering previous experience are encouraged.
  •  
10.
  • Rasouli, Omid, et al. (author)
  • Bereaved parents' quality of life : resilience and professional support
  • 2023
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 13, s. e1029-e1037
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the quality of life (QoL) among cancer-bereaved parents with a control group and explore how resilience and support from healthcare professionals associated with QoL of parents 2-8 years after the loss of a child to cancer.METHODS: This nationwide, cross-sectional survey was administered among parents (n=161) who lost their child to cancer between 2009 and 2014, compared with a matched control parent group (n=77). A study-specific questionnaire, Resilience Scale for Adults (six factors: 'Perception of self', 'Planned future', 'Social competence', 'Structured style', 'Family cohesion' and 'Social resources'), and a single-item measure of parents' QoL were included for the study.RESULTS: There was a lower QoL in both bereaved parents (mean=5.1) compared with the control parents (mean=5.8) (p<0.001). Two resilience factors, 'Perception of self' (OR=1.8, p=0.004) and 'Planned future' (OR=2.05, p<0.001), and given sufficient information during the child's last month (OR=2.63, p=0.003) were positively associated with long-term QoL in cancer-bereaved parents.CONCLUSION: The findings indicate lower QoL among both fathers and mothers 2-8 years after losing a child to cancer. The study also highlights the positive role of resilience and the importance of informational support on long-term QoL in cancer-bereaved parents. Bereavement support should be tailored for supporting individual needs.
  •  
11.
  • Sandgren, Anna, 1970-, et al. (author)
  • Hospitalised patients with palliative care needs : Spain and Sweden compared
  • 2024
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 14:e1, s. E851-E859
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives This study aimed to describe and compare symptoms, care needs and types of diagnoses in hospitalised patients with palliative care needs in Spain and Sweden.Methods A cross-sectional, population-based study was carried out at two hospitals in both Spain and Sweden. Using a questionnaire, we performed 154 one-day inventories (n=4213) in Spain and 139 in Sweden (n=3356) to register symptoms, care needs and diagnoses. Descriptive analyses were used.Results The proportion of patients with care needs in the two countries differed (Spain 7.7% vs Sweden 12.4%, p<0.001); however, the percentage of patients with cancer and non-cancer patients was similar. The most prevalent symptoms in cancer and non-cancer patients in both countries were deterioration, pain, fatigue and infection. The most common cancer diagnosis in both countries was lung cancer, although it was more common in Spain (p<0.01), whereas prostate cancer was more common among Swedish men (p<0.001). Congestive heart failure (p<0.001) was a predominant non-cancer diagnosis in Sweden, whereas in Spain, the most frequent diagnosis was dementia (p<0.001). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was common in both countries, although its frequency was higher in Spain (p<0.05). In total, patients with cancer had higher frequencies of pain (p<0.001) and nausea (p<0.001), whereas non-cancer patients had higher frequencies of deterioration (p<0.001) and infections (p<0.01).Conclusions The similarities in symptoms among the patients indicate that the main focus in care should be on patient care needs rather than diagnoses. Integrating palliative care in hospitals and increasing healthcare professional competency can result in providing optimal palliative care.
  •  
12.
  • Schedin, A, et al. (author)
  • Catheter-related bloodstream infections in palliative care patients receiving parenteral nutrition by medical home care
  • 2020
  • In: BMJ supportive & palliative care. - : BMJ. - 2045-4368 .- 2045-435X.
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) constitute a major complication associated with the use of central venous lines (CVL). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence proportion and risk factors of CRSBI in palliative care patients with CVL receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN).MethodsMedical records from patients admitted to a medical home care unit in stockholm, Sweden, during 2017 were reviewed (n=1022) and 454 palliative care patients with a CVL were identified. Data on CRBSI cases, HPN exposure time, type of parenteral nutrition (PN), age, diagnosis and type of CVL were collected.ResultsTwenty-nine of 143 patients receiving HPN through a CVL were diagnosed with a CRBSI (20%). Nine of 311 patients with CVL without exposure for HPN developed CRBSI (3%). The risk of a CRBSI was significantly higher in patients receiving HPN compared with those not receiving HPN, OR 8.5 (95% CI 4.0 to 18.7). For those receiving HPN six to seven times a week the risk was even higher, OR 13 (95% CI 5.1 to 30.3). The highest incidence proportion of CRBSI (31%) was found in a home care team where patients had been trained to disconnect themselves from the PN drip. Sex, cancer versus non-cancer, type of CVL or protein content in the PN, did not differ between patients that developed CRBSI versus those that did not develop the outcome.ConclusionHPN entails a high risk of CRBSI. A high frequency of PN and incautious handling of the disconnection of the drip, seem to be the most important risk factors.
  •  
13.
  • Steel, A, et al. (author)
  • Complementary medicine visits by palliative care patients: a cross-sectional survey
  • 2022
  • In: BMJ supportive & palliative care. - : BMJ. - 2045-4368 .- 2045-435X. ; 12:E1e1, s. E47-E58
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The paucity of empirical research examining complementary medicine (CM) use in palliative care in France compared with other countries results in a gap in scientific knowledge. This study aims to describe the frequency and the cause of palliative care patients consulting with a CM clinician along with the conventional physicians.MethodsThis study is an observational cross-sectional survey conducted in three palliative care centres in Lyon, France, between July 2017 and May 2018: two tertiary hospitals and one palliative care unit in a private hospital. Inpatients and outpatients visiting the palliative care clinics with a primary diagnosis of cancer were invited to participate in the study. Using a 19-item paper-based survey instrument, we collected data on the participants’ personal characteristics, health service utilisation and attitudes towards CM.ResultsFrom the 138 participants meeting the inclusion criteria, 100 (72.4%) were included in the study. On average, they were 62.9 years old (SD 12.4) and the majority were women (60%). The primary cancer site was mostly colorectal (29.0%), breast (15.0%) and gynaecological (11.0%). The most commonly visited CM clinician was the aromatherapist (72.7%), recording more than six consultations (78.1%) for symptom management (21.9%). Visits to an osteopath were reported by 28.6% of patients, and 45.8% of osteopathy users reported visiting an osteopath more than six times for symptom management (62.5%). Participants visiting a naturopath (15.3%) reported less than four visits and indicated symptom management as the most common reason (76.9%).ConclusionsOur findings show a substantial proportion of palliative care patients visit CM clinicians and primarily seek symptom management from CM clinical care.
  •  
14.
  • Szilcz, Máté, et al. (author)
  • Unplanned hospitalisations in older people : illness trajectories in the last year of life
  • 2021
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; , s. bmjspcare-2020-002778-
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objective Unplanned hospitalisations can be burdensome for older people who approach the end of life. Hospitalisations disrupt the continuity of care and often run against patients' preference for comfort and palliative goals of care. This study aimed to describe the patterns of unplanned hospitalisations across illness trajectories in the last year of life.Methods Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of decedents, including all older adults (>= 65 years) who died in Sweden in 2015. We used nationwide data from the National Cause of Death Register linked at the individual level with several other administrative and healthcare registers. Illness trajectories were defined based on multiple-cause-of-death data to approximate functional decline near the end of life. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for unplanned hospitalisations were modelled with zero-inflated Poisson regressions.Results In a total of 77 315 older decedents (53% women, median age 85.2 years), the overall incidence rate of unplanned hospitalisations during the last year of life was 175 per 100 patient-years. The adjusted IRR for unplanned hospitalisation was 1.20 (95%CI 1.18 to 1.21) times higher than average among decedents who followed a trajectory of cancer. Conversely, decedents who followed the trajectory of prolonged dwindling had a lower-than-average risk of unplanned hospitalisation (IRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.68). However, these differences between illness trajectories only became evident during the last 3 months of life.Conclusion Our study highlights that, during the last 3 months of life, unplanned hospitalisations are increasingly frequent. Policies aiming to reduce burdensome care transitions should consider the underlying illness trajectories.
  •  
15.
  • Talabani, N., et al. (author)
  • Patients' experiences of person-centred integrated heart failure care and palliative care at home: an interview study
  • 2020
  • In: Bmj Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 10:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives Patients with severe heart failure (HF) suffer from a high symptom burden and high mortality. European and Swedish guidelines for HF care recommend palliative care for these patients. Different models for integrated palliative care and HF care have been described in the literature. No studies were found that qualitatively evaluated these models. The purpose of this study is to describe patients' experiences of a new model of person-centred integrated HF and palliative care at home. Method Interviews were conducted with 12 patients with severe HF (New York Heart Association class III(sic)nd included in the research project of Palliative advanced home caRE and heart FailurE caRe (PREFER). Qualitative content analysis was used for data analysis. Results Two themes and a total of five categories were identified. The first theme was feeling secure and safe through receiving care at home with the categories: having access to readily available care at home, being followed up continuously and having trust in the team members' ability to help. The second theme was being acknowledged as both a person and a patient, with the following two categories: being met as a person, participating in decisions about one's care and receiving help for symptoms of both HF and comorbidities. Conclusions Person-centred integrated HF and palliative care provides a secure environment and holistic care for patients with severe HF. This approach is a way to improve the care management in this population.
  •  
16.
  • van Vliet, Liesbeth M, et al. (author)
  • Good versus bad news consultations in advanced breast cancer: the role of empathy in information recall – an observational study
  • 2024
  • In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368. ; 14, s. e528-e532
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objective We explored, in advanced breast cancer, whether: (1) patients recall less information following bad versus good news consultations; (2) empathy has a greater effect on recalled information following bad versus good news consultations.Methods Observational study using audio-recorded consultations. Participants’ recall of provided information about treatment options, aims/positive effects and side-effects was assessed. Clinician-expressed empathy and consultation type were determined. Regression analyses assessed associations between consultation type and recall, exploring moderating influences of clinician-expressed empathy.ResultsFor 41 consultations (18 bad news, 23 good news), recall data were completed; total recall (47% vs 73%, p=0.03) and recall about treatment options (67% vs 85%, p=0.08, trend) were significantly worse following bad news compared with good news consultations. Recall about treatment aims/positive effects (53% vs 70%, p=0.30) and side-effects (28% vs 49%, p=0.20) was not significantly worse following bad news. Empathy moderated the relationship between consultation type and total recall (p<0.01), recall about treatment options (p=0.03) and about aims/positive effects (p<0.01) but not about side-effects (p=0.10). Only following good news consultations empathy influenced recall favourably.Conclusions This explorative study suggests that in advanced cancer, information recall is especially impaired following bad news consultations, for which empathy does not improve remembered information.
  •  
17.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-17 of 17
Type of publication
journal article (15)
research review (2)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (17)
Author/Editor
Brännström, Margaret ... (3)
Bjorkhem-Bergman, L (2)
Sandgren, Anna, 1970 ... (2)
Öhlén, Joakim, 1958 (2)
Andersson, Sofia, 19 ... (2)
Bonn, S (2)
show more...
Schedin, A (2)
Nilsen, Per (1)
Strang, Peter (1)
Johnell, Kristina (1)
Nilsson, Stefan, 197 ... (1)
Morin, Lucas (1)
Boman, Kurt (1)
Currow, David C (1)
Trolle-Lagerros, Y (1)
van Dulmen, Sandra (1)
Lynöe, Niels (1)
Hessman, Eva, 1961 (1)
Almerud, A (1)
Klasson, C (1)
Björkhem-Bergman, L (1)
Alvariza, Anette (1)
Alvariza, A (1)
Agar, Meera (1)
O'Sullivan, Anna (1)
Baxter, Rebecca, 198 ... (1)
Sawatzky, Richard (1)
Pusa, Susanna, 1982- (1)
Fromme, Erik K. (1)
Paladino, Joanna (1)
Juth, Niklas, 1973- (1)
Lindquist, David (1)
Engström, Ingemar, 1 ... (1)
Frankling, MH (1)
Steel, A (1)
Wastesson, Jonas W. (1)
Hjemdal, Odin (1)
de Jong, Paul C (1)
Ekstrom, Magnus (1)
Chung, Vincent C. H. (1)
Ho, Fai Fai (1)
Johnson, Miriam J. (1)
Zapardiel, Ignacio (1)
Fazekas, Belinda (1)
Filbet, M (1)
Eilegård Wallin, Ale ... (1)
Lund, Bendik (1)
Eilertsen, Mary-Eliz ... (1)
Hellström Ängerud, K ... (1)
Hagelin, CL (1)
show less...
University
Karolinska Institutet (7)
Umeå University (5)
University of Gothenburg (3)
Örebro University (2)
Linnaeus University (2)
Uppsala University (1)
show more...
Stockholm University (1)
Linköping University (1)
Lund University (1)
University of Borås (1)
Sophiahemmet University College (1)
show less...
Language
English (17)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Medical and Health Sciences (13)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view