| 1. |
- Kiwanuka, Olivia, et al.
(author)
-
Long-term health-related quality of life after trauma with and without traumatic brain injury : a prospective cohort study
- 2023
-
In: Scientific Reports. - : Springer Nature. - 2045-2322. ; 13:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- To purpose was to assess and compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and risk of depression two years after trauma, between patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a mixed Swedish trauma cohort. In this prospective cohort study, TBI and non-TBI trauma patients included in the Swedish Trauma registry 2019 at a level II trauma center in Stockholm, Sweden, were contacted two years after admission. HRQoL was assessed with RAND-36 and EQ-5D-3L, and depression with Montgomery Åsberg depression Rating Scale self-report (MADRS-S). Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) head was used to grade TBI severity, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was used to assess comorbidities. Data were compared using Chi-squared test, Mann Whitney U test and ordered logistic regression, and Bonferroni correction was applied. A total of 170 of 737 eligible patients were included. TBI was associated with higher scores in 5/8 domains of RAND-36 and 3/5 domains of EQ-5D (p < 0.05). No significant difference in MADRS-S. An AIS (head) of three or higher was associated with lower scores in five domains of RAND-36 and two domains of EQ-5D but not for MADRS-S. An ASA-score of three was associated with lower scores in all domains of both RAND-36 (p < 0.05, except mental health) and EQ-5D (p < 0.001, except anxiety/depression), but not for MADRS-S. In conclusion, patients without TBI reported a lower HRQoL than TBI patients two years after trauma. TBI severity assessed according to AIS (head) was associated with HRQoL, and ASA-score was found to be a predictor of HRQoL, emphasizing the importance of considering pre-injury health status when assessing outcomes in TBI patients.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nyberg, Anette, et al.
(author)
-
Longer work experience and age associated with safety attitudes in operating room nurses : an online cross-sectional study
- 2024
-
In: BMJ open quality. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2399-6641. ; 13:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patient safety is fundamental when providing care in the operating room. Still, adverse events and errors are a challenge for patient safety worldwide. To avoid preventable patient harm, organisations need a positive safety culture, the measurable component of which is known as the safety climate. To best improve the safety climate the current attitudes to safety must first be understood.AIM: To explore operating room nurses' safety attitudes and their views on how to improve patient safety in operating rooms.ETHOD: A cross-sectional study using the Swedish-translated version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, Operating Room version. Data were collected using an online survey platform.RESULTS: 358 operating room nurses completed the questionnaire. The results show that the older age group rated their working conditions and management support as better than the younger age groups. The older age group also rated their stress recognition as lower compared with the younger age groups. The same pattern was seen in terms of work experience, with more-experienced respondents showing a higher mean score for the factor working conditions and a lower mean score for the factor stress recognition as compared with their less-experienced colleagues. When comparing hospital types, county hospital employees had higher factor scores for safety climate, job satisfaction and working conditions than university hospital employees. The respondents' most recurring recommendations for improving patient safety were 'Having better and clearer communication' followed by 'Having enough time to do things the way they should be done'.CONCLUSION: More focus on safety with increasing age and experience was observed in this cohort. Need for improvements is reported for patient safety in operating rooms, mainly when it comes to communication and workload. To improve and develop patient safety in the operating room, the organisational safety climate needs to be actively managed and developed. One step in actively managing the safety climate may be efforts to retain experienced operating room nurses.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nyberg, Anette, et al.
(author)
-
Perioperative patient safety indicators : A Delphi study
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: To identify, define and achieve consensus on perioperative patient safety indicators within a Swedish context.DesignA modified Delphi method.Methods: A purposeful sample of 22 experts, all experienced operating room nurse specialists, was recruited for this study. A questionnaire was constructed incorporating statements derived from a preceding study. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each statement concerning patient safety during the perioperative phase. The data collection occurred through an online survey platform between November 2022 and April 2023. The CREDES checklist guided the reporting of this study.Results: The three-round Delphi study resulted in consensus on 73 statements out of 103, encompassing 74% process indicators and 26% structure indicators. Key areas of consensus included the use of the Surgical Safety Checklist and optimizing the operating room environment.Conclusion: Consensus was reached on perioperative safety indicators, underscoring the intricate challenges involved in ensuring patient safety in the operating room. It emphasizes the important integration of both structure and process indicators for comprehensive safety assessment during surgical procedures. Recognizing the difficulty in measuring factors like teamwork and communication, essential for patient safety, the study offers practical guidance. It underlines a balanced approach and specific consensus areas applicable in clinical practice to enhance perioperative patient safety.Implications for the profession and patient care: This study provides concrete practice guidance and establishes a structured framework for evaluating perioperative care processes. It emphasizes the critical role of professionals having the necessary skills and being present during surgical procedures. Additionally, the study underscores the paramount importance of effective communication and teamwork within the operating room team, substantively contributing to overall patient safety enhancement.Impact: The study focused on addressing the challenge of ensuring patient safety in operating rooms, acknowledging the persistent complications related to surgery despite global efforts to eliminate avoidable harm in healthcare. Consensus was reached on 73 crucial indicators for perioperative patient safety, emphasizing a balanced approach integrating both process and structure indicators for a comprehensive assessment of safety during surgical procedures. The study has a broad impact on professionals and healthcare systems, providing concrete guidance for practice and offering a structured process for evaluating perioperative care.Reporting Method: The study is reported informed by 'Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations derived from a methodological systematic review'.Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.
|
|
