| 1. |
- Avdic, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
Do responses to news matter? : Evidence from interventional cardiology
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Health Economics. - : Elsevier. - 0167-6296 .- 1879-1646. ; 94
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We examine physician responses to a global information shock and how these impact their patients. We exploit international news over the safety of an innovation in healthcare, the drugeluting stent. We use data on interventional cardiologists' use of stents to define and measure cardiologists' responsiveness to the initial positive news and link this to their patients' outcomes. We find substantial heterogeneity in responsiveness to news. Patients treated by cardiologists who respond slowly to the initial positive news have fewer adverse outcomes. This is not due to patient-physician sorting. Instead, our results suggest that the differences are partially driven by slow responders being better at deciding when (not) to use the new technology, which in turn affects their patient outcomes.
|
|
| 2. |
- Avdic, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
Providers, peers and patients. How do physicians? : practice environments affect patient outcomes?
- 2023
-
In: Journal of Health Economics. - : Elsevier. - 0167-6296 .- 1879-1646. ; 89
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We study how physicians' practice environments affect their treatment decisions and quality of care. Using clinical registry data from Sweden, we compare stent choices of cardiologists moving across hospitals over time. To disentangle changes in practice styles attributable to hospital-and peer group-specific factors, we exploit quasi-random variation on cardiologists working together on the same days. We find that migrating cardiologists' stent choices rapidly adapt to their new practice environment after relocation and are equally driven by the hospital and peer environments. In contrast, while decision errors increase, treatment costs and adverse clinical events remain largely unchanged despite the altered practice styles.
|
|
| 3. |
- Buccheri, Sergio, et al.
(author)
-
Clinical outcomes with unselected use of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent : a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR)
- 2021
-
In: EuroIntervention. - : European Society of Cardiology. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 16:17, s. 1413-1421
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world clinical performance of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stent (DES) (Orsiro) in a large nationwide cohort of patients undergoing percu-taneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and results: From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, the two-year outcomes of 4,561 patients implanted with Orsiro (Orsiro group) and 69,570 receiving other newer-gen-eration DES (n-DES group) were analysed. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was low in both groups (0.67% and 0.83% for Orsiro and n-DES, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.46, p-value 0.66). Restenosis was also infrequent (1.5% vs 2.0% with Orsiro and n-DES, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.63-1.03, p-value=0.09). The risk of target lesion revascularisation by PCI was lower in the Orsiro group (1.6% vs 2.3%, adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94, p-value=0.013). All-cause mortality and myocardial infarction did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (mortality of 7.5% in both groups, adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.72-1.35, p-value=0.94; 6.0% vs 5.2% for myocardial infarction, adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.43, p-value=0.06).Conclusions: In a nationwide scenario, the use of a sirolimus-eluting ultrathin-strut DES portended favourable clinical outcomes.
|
|
| 4. |
- Edfors, Robert, et al.
(author)
-
SWEDEHEART-1-year data show no benefit of newer generation drug-eluting stents over bare-metal stents in patients with severe kidney dysfunction following percutaneous coronary intervention
- 2020
-
In: Coronary Artery Disease. - : LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. - 0954-6928 .- 1473-5830. ; 31:1, s. 49-58
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background We hypothesized that the transition from bare-metal stents (BMS) to newer generation drug-eluting stents (n-DES) in clinical practice may have reduced the risk also in patients with kidney dysfunction. Methods: Observational study in the national SWEDEHEART registry, that compared the 1-year risk of in-stent restenosis (RS) and stent thrombosis (ST) in all percutaneous coronary intervention treated patients(n = 92 994) during 2007-2013. Results: N-DES patients were younger than BMS, but had more often diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, previous revascularization and were more often treated with potent platelet inhibition. N-DES versus BMS, was associated with lower 1-year risk of RS in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 with a cumulative probability of 2.1% versus 5.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI (0.27-0.34) and with eGFR 30-60: 3.0% versus 4.9%; hazard ratio 0.46 (0.36-0.60) but not in patients with eGFR <30: 8.1% versus 6.0%; hazard ratio 1.32 (0.71-2.45) (pinteraction = 0.009) as well as lower risk of ST for eGFR >60 and eGFR 30-60: 0.5% versus 0.9%; hazard ratio 0.52 (0.40-0.68) and 0.6% versus 1.3%; hazard ratio 0.54 (0.54-0.72) but not for eGFR <30; 2.1% versus 1.1%; hazard ratio 1.49 (0.56-3.98) (p(interaction)= 0.027). Conclusion: N-DES is associated with lower 1-year risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis in patients with normal or moderately reduced kidney function but not in patients with severe kidney dysfunction, where stenting is associated with worse outcomes regardless of stent type.
|
|
| 5. |
- Grimfjärd, Per, et al.
(author)
-
Outcome of PCI with Xience versus other commonly used modern drug eluting stents : a SCAAR report
- 2021
-
In: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. - : Wiley. - 1522-1946 .- 1522-726X. ; 98:2, s. E197-E204
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives To analyze the clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Xience drug eluting stent (DES) versus other modern DES.Methods This retrospective study based on the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) analyzed the outcome of PCI using Xience versus other commonly used modern DES, 2007 to 2017. The primary outcome measure was a combination of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularisation with PCI. Angiographical outcome measures were in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST).Results Rates of the primary outcome measure for Xience and other DES were 31.9% and 28.2% respectively, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.95-1.03). Crude rates of ISR were 2.9% versus 2.1% over 4.3 and 2.9 years respectively, adjusted HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-1.06). Crude rates of ST were 0.9% versus 0.7%, adjusted HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.82-1.39). Results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses.Conclusions This nationally complete, real-world study confirms that Xience is a safe and effective DES with low-event rates of ISR and ST. Compared with a control group containing a large proportion of thinner strut stents and absorbable polymers, Xience exhibits similar results in all important clinical endpoint
|
|
| 6. |
- Harnek, Jan, et al.
(author)
-
Coronary artery perforation and tamponade : Incidence, risk factors, predictors and outcomes from 12 years' data of the SCAAR registry
- 2020
-
In: Circulation Journal. - 1346-9843 .- 1347-4820. ; 84:1, s. 43-53
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The incidence and short- and long-term outcomes of coronary artery perforation (CAP) are not well described. Methods and Results: We analyzed the characteristics and the short- and long-term outcomes of CAP among 243,149 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from 2005 until 2017 in the national Swedish registry. We identified 1,008 cases of CAP with an incidence of 0.42%. Major adverse event rates were significantly higher in patients with CAP than non-CAP (P<0.001). The 1-year mortality rate was 16% vs. 5.5%, respectively, and the 12-year mortality rate was 52% vs. 34%. The restenosis rate was 5.2% vs. 3.1% and 17% vs. 9%, respectively. The target lesion revascularization rate was 4.2% vs. 2.6% and 10.5% vs. 7%. The stent thrombosis rate was numerically higher, 1.5% vs. 0.8% and 4.5 vs. 2.8%, with no stent thrombosis cases for equine pericardial stent grafts. Among the patients with tamponade a large proportion of cases occurred at the late stage (215/1,008, 21%), and most were not recognized in the cath-lab (167/215, 78%). The mortality rate for late tamponade was similar in patients suffering acute tamponade at 1 year (25.6% vs. 27%) or at 12 years (54% vs. 58%). Conclusions: CAP is associated with an early high excess in morbidity and mortality but with low risk of additional adverse events in the long term. Late tamponade is as deadly as acute tamponade.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Kero, Tanja, et al.
(author)
-
Quantitative myocardial perfusion response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1071-3581 .- 1532-6551. ; 29:1, s. 24-36
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the quantitative flow responses of regadenoson against adenosine using cardiac 15O-water PET imaging in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS: Hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) after adenosine and regadenoson was compared using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis in 21 patients who underwent rest and adenosine 15O-water PET scans followed by rest and regadenoson 15O-water PET scans.RESULTS: Global mean (± SD) MBF values at rest and stress were 0.92 ± 0.27 and 2.68 ± 0.80 mL·g·min for the adenosine study and 0.95 ± 0.29 and 2.76 ± 0.79 mL·g·min for the regadenoson study (P = 0.55 and P = 0.49). The correlations between global and regional adenosine- and regadenoson-based stress MBF were strong (r = 0.80 and r = 0.77). The biases were small for both global and regional MBF comparisons (0.08 and 0.09 mL·min·g), but the limits of agreement were wide for stress MBF.CONCLUSION: The correlation between regadenoson- and adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF was strong but the agreement was only moderate indicating that established cut-off values for 150-water PET should be used cautiously if using regadenoson as vasodilator.
|
|
| 9. |
- Manzi, Maria Virginia, et al.
(author)
-
Sex-Related Differences in Thrombus Burden in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- 2022
-
In: JACC. - : Elsevier. - 1936-8798 .- 1876-7605. ; 15:20, s. 2066-2076
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Women have a worse prognosis after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than men. The prognostic role of thrombus burden (TB) in influencing the sex-related differences in clinical outcomes after STEMI has not been clearly investigated.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the sex-related differences in TB and its clinical implications in patients with STEMI.METHODS: Individual patient data from the 3 major randomized clinical trials of manual thrombus aspiration were analyzed, encompassing a total of 19,047 patients with STEMI, of whom 13,885 (76.1%) were men and 4,371 (23.9%) were women. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year cardiovascular (CV) death. The secondary outcomes of interest were recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, all-cause mortality, stroke, stent thrombosis (ST), and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.RESULTS: Patients with high TB (HTB) had worse 1-year outcomes compared with those presenting with low TB (adjusted HR for CV death: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.10-2.12; P = 0.01). In unadjusted analyses, female sex was associated with an increased risk for 1-year CV death regardless of TB. After adjustment, the risk for 1-year CV death was higher only in women with HTB (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.18-1.28; P < 0.001), who also had an increased risk for all-cause death and ST than men.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI, angiographic evidence of HTB negatively affected prognosis. Among patients with HTB, women had an excess risk for ST, CV, and all-cause mortality than men. Further investigations are warranted to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to excess mortality in women with STEMI and HTB.
|
|
| 10. |
- Ritsinger, Viveca, et al.
(author)
-
Admission Glucose Levels and Associated Risk for Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Diabetes.
- 2021
-
In: Journal of the American Heart Association. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 2047-9980. ; 10:22
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Dysglycemia at acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common and is associated with mortality. Information on other outcomes is less well explored in patients without diabetes in a long-term perspective. We aimed to explore the relationship between admission glucose level and long-term outcomes in patients with AMI without diabetes in a nationwide setting. Methods and Results Patients without diabetes (n=45 468) with AMI registered in SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) and admission glucose ≤11 mmol/L (≤198 mg/dL) were followed for outcomes (AMI, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, and death) between 2012 and 2017 (mean follow-up time 3.3±1.7 years). The association between categorized glucose levels and outcomes was assessed in adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (glucose levels 4.0-6.0 mmol/L [72-109 mg/dL] as reference). Further nonfatal complications and their associated mortality were explored (patients without events served as a reference). A glucose level of 7.8-11.0 mmol/L (140-198 mg/dL) was associated with hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.51], P<0.001), renal failure (1.17; 1.04-1.33, P=0.009), and death (1.31; 1.20-1.43, P<0.001), but not with recurrent myocardial infarction (0.99; 0.92-1.07, P=0.849) or stroke (1.03; 0.88-1.19, P=0.742). Renal failure had the strongest association with future mortality (age-adjusted HR 4.93 [95% CI, 4.34-5.60], P<0.001), followed by heart failure (3.71; 3.41-4.04, P<0.001), stroke (3.39; 2.94-3.91, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (2.08; 1.88-2.30, P<0.001). Conclusions Elevated glucose levels at AMI admission identifies patients without diabetes at increased risk of long-term complications: in particular, hospitalization for heart and renal failure. These results emphasize that glucose levels at admission could be useful in risk assessment after myocardial infarction.
|
|
| 11. |
- Ritsinger, Viveca, et al.
(author)
-
Design and rationale of the myocardial infarction and new treatment with metformin study (MIMET) - Study protocol for a registry-based randomised clinical trial
- 2023
-
In: Journal of diabetes and its complications. - : Elsevier. - 1056-8727 .- 1873-460X. ; 37:10
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: To investigate if addition of metformin to standard care (life-style advice) reduces the occurrence of cardiovascular events and death after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with newly detected prediabetes.Methods: The Myocardial Infarction and new treatment with Metformin study (MIMET) is a large multicentre registry-based randomised clinical trial (R-RCT) within the SWEDEHEART registry platform expected to include 5160 patients with MI and newly detected prediabetes (identified with fasting blood glucose, HbA1c or 2-h glucose on oral glucose tolerance test) at similar to 20 study sites in Sweden. Patients 18-80 years, without known diabetes and naive to glucose lowering therapy, will be randomised 1:1 to open-label metformin therapy plus standard care or standard care alone.Outcomes: Patients will be followed for 2 years for the primary outcome new cardiovascular event (first of death, non-fatal MI, hospitalisation for heart failure or non-fatal stroke). Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary endpoint, diabetes diagnosis, initiation of any glucose lowering therapy, cancer, and treatment safety. Events will be collected from national healthcare registries.Conclusions: The MIMET study will investigate if metformin is superior to standard care after myocardial infarction in preventing cardiovascular events in patients with prediabetes (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05182970; EudraCT No: 2019-001487-30).
|
|
| 12. |
- Ritsinger, Viveca, et al.
(author)
-
Diabetes, metformin and glucose lowering therapies after myocardial infarction : Insights from the SWEDEHEART registry
- 2020
-
In: Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research. - : SAGE Publications. - 1479-1641 .- 1752-8984. ; 17:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To explore real-life use of glucose lowering drugs and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a special focus on metformin.METHODS: Patients (n = 70270) admitted for AMI 2012-2017 were stratified by diabetes status and glucose lowering treatment and followed for mortality and MACE+ (AMI, heart failure (HF), stroke, mortality) until end of 2017 (mean follow-up time 3.4 ± 1.4 years) through linkage with national registries and SWEDEHEART. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated in adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models.RESULTS: Mean age was 68 ± 11 years and 70% were male. Of patients with diabetes (n = 16356; 23%), a majority had at least one glucose lowering drug (81%) of whom 51% had metformin (24% monotherapy), 43% insulin and a minority any SGLT2i/GLP-1 RA (5%). Adjusted HR for patients with versus without diabetes was 1.31 (95% CI 1.27-1.36) for MACE+ and 1.48 (1.41-1.56) for mortality. Adjusted HR for MACE+ for diabetes patients on metformin was 0.92 (0.85-0.997), p = 0.042 compared to diet treated diabetes.CONCLUSION: Diabetes still implies a high complication risk after AMI. Metformin and insulin were the most common treatment used in almost half of the diabetes population. Furthermore, patients treated with metformin had a lower cardiovascular risk after AMI and needs to be confirmed in prospective controlled trials.
|
|
| 13. |
- Ritsinger, Viveca, et al.
(author)
-
Heart failure is a common complication after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes : A nationwide study in the SWEDEHEART registry.
- 2020
-
In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2047-4873 .- 2047-4881. ; 27:17, s. 1890-1901
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Several glucose lowering drugs with preventive effects on heart failure and death have entered the market, however, still used in low proportions after acute myocardial infarction. We explored the complication rates of heart failure and death after acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes.METHODS: All patients (N = 73,959) with acute myocardial infarction admitted for coronary angiography included in the SWEDEHEART registry during the years 2012-2017 were followed for heart failure (until 31 December 2017) and mortality (until 30 June 2018); mean follow-up time 1223 (SD ± 623) days.RESULTS: Mean age was 69 years (SD ± 12), 69% were male and 24% had diabetes. Heart failure occurred more often in diabetes (22% vs. 12% if no diabetes), especially if previous MI (33% vs. 23%). Patients with diabetes had increased risk of HF regardless of previous myocardial infarction (MI); with previous MI adjusted hazard ratio 2.09 (95% confidence interval 1.96-2.20) and without MI 1.52 (1.44-1.61) respectively when non-diabetes patients with first MI served as reference. In patients with no previous heart failure or MI and discharged with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% the risk of heart failure was particularly high in those with diabetes (1.56; 1.39-1.76) when compared with those without. Similar findings were seen for death and combined event (heart failure and death).CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure is a common complication after acute myocardial infarction in diabetes, increasing the risk by 50-60% regardless of previous heart failure or MI. This risk is present even with normal reported left ventricular ejection fraction, indicating the existence of a large diabetes population at heart failure risk after acute myocardial infarction.
|
|
| 14. |
- Santos-Pardo, Irene, et al.
(author)
-
Risk of stent failure in patients with diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors : A nationwide observational study
- 2021
-
In: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 330, s. 23-29
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Incretins are a group of glucose-lowering drugs with favourable cardiovascular (CV) effects against neoatherosclerosis. Incretins' potential effect in stent failure is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine if incretin treatment decreases the risk of stent-thrombosis (ST), and/or in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implanted drug-eluting stents (DES).Methods: Observational study including all diabetes patients who underwent PCI with DES in Sweden from 2007 to 2017. By merging 5 national registers, the information on patient characteristics, outcomes and drug dispenses was retrieved. Cox regression analysis with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for confounders with 95% confidence intervals (Cis) was used to analyse for the occurrence of ST/ISR, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A subgroup analysis for the type of incretin treatment was performed.Results: In total 18,505 diabetes patients (30% women) underwent PCI, and 32,463 DES were implanted. Of those, 10% (3449 DES in 1943 patients) were treated with incretins. Median follow-up time was 995 clays (Control Group) vs. 771 days (Incretin Group). No significant difference in the risk of ST/ISR was found neither for the main study group (HR:0.98 95% CI:0.80-1.19) nor for the subgroups. No reduction of the risk of MACE (HR:0.96 95% CI:0.88-1.06) was observed. There was a 26% lower risk for CV death in favour of incretin treated patients (HR:0.74 95% 0:057-0.95).Conclusion: In diabetes patients who underwent PCI incretin treatment was not associated with lower risk of stent failure, but with lower risk of CV death.
|
|
| 15. |
- Silverio, Angelo, et al.
(author)
-
Percutaneous Treatment and Outcomes of Small Coronary Vessels A SCAAR Report
- 2020
-
In: JACC. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1936-8798 .- 1876-7605. ; 13:7, s. 793-804
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with de novo lesions in small coronary vessels undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) or newer-generation drug-eluting stents (n-DES). BACKGROUND Notwithstanding the available evidence from a few randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses, the best device for PCI in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease is not yet established. METHODS The study included all consecutive patients with de novo lesions in small coronary vessels undergoing PCI in Sweden from April 2009 to July 2017. A small coronary vessel was defined by a device diameter <= 2.5 mm. The primary outcomes were restenosis and definite target lesion thrombosis at 3-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the occurrence of all-cause death and myocardial infarction. RESULTS The study population included 14,788 patients: 1,154 treated with DCBs and 13,634 with n-DES. Overall, 35,541 PCIs were performed using 2,503 DCBs and 33,038 n-DES. The propensity score-adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly higher risk for restenosis in the DCB group compared with the n-DES group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.027; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.537 to 2.674). Conversely, no difference in the risk for target lesion thrombosis (adjusted HR: 0.741; 95% CI: 0.412 to 1.331) was detected. The risk for all-cause death (adjusted HR: 1.178; 95% CI: 0.992 to 1.399) and myocardial infarction (adjusted HR: 1.251; 95% CI: 0.960 to 1.629) was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Because of the significantly higher risk for restenosis up to 3 years, this research suggests that DCBs are not an equally effective alternative to n-DES for percutaneous treatment of small coronary vessels. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
| 16. |
- Valachis, Antonis, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
Bleeding risk in breast cancer patients during concomitant administration of warfarin and tamoxifen : A population-based nested case-control study
- 2020
-
In: The Breast Journal. - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 1075-122X .- 1524-4741. ; 26:5, s. 981-987
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We aimed to investigate whether the concomitant use of tamoxifen with warfarin is associated with higher risk for bleeding among patients with early estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast in a population-based nested case-control study. We identified 1787 patients taking warfarin and 92 cases hospitalized for bleeding and found an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.42 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-2.40) for the risk of bleeding in patients treated with warfarin that initiated tamoxifen within the previous 30 days. As a result, we could not definitively rule out a potential association between tamoxifen use during warfarin and bleeding risk in patients with breast cancer.
|
|
