| 1. |
- Beyer, J., et al.
(author)
-
Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer
- 2013
-
In: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 24:4, s. 878-888
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, similar to 50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Pignot, G., et al.
(author)
-
L’Ischémie n’est pas un facteur d’insuffisance rénale chronique après néphrectomie partielle sur rein unique
- 2014
-
In: Progrès en urologie (Paris). - : Elsevier. - 1166-7087. ; 24:13, s. 822-822
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectifs Déterminer l‘influence du clampage pédiculaire et de sa durée sur la fonction rénale à long terme après néphrectomie partielle (NP) pour cancer sur rein unique.Méthodes L’étude a inclus rétrospectivement 259 patients opérés par NP entre 1979 et 2010 dans 13 centres. L’utilisation d’un clampage, son type (pédiculaire ou parenchymateux), sa durée ainsi que les données pré-, intra- et postopératoires ont été recueillies. Les valeurs de débit de filtration glomérulaire (DFG) préopératoire et au dernier suivi ont été comparés. Une analyse multivariée selon le modèle de Cox a été réalisée afin de déterminer l’impact de l’ischémie sur le risque d’insuffisance rénale (IR) chronique postopératoire.Résultats La taille moyenne des tumeurs était de 4,0±2,3cm et le DFG préopératoire moyen de 60,8±18,9ml/min. Au total, 106 patients ont été opérés en ischémie chaude (40,9 %) et 53 en ischémie froide (20,5 %). Trente patients (11,6 %) ont évolué vers l’insuffisance rénale chronique. En analyse multivariée, ni le clampage pédiculaire (p=0,44), ni la durée d’ischémie chaude (p=0,1) n’étaient associés à une évolution vers l’insuffisance rénale. Les facteurs indépendants d’insuffisance rénale à long terme étaient le DFG préopératoire (p<0,0001) et les pertes sanguines (p=0,02).Conclusion La fonction rénale après NP sur rein unique apparaît principalement liée à des facteurs non modifiables et notamment le DFG préopératoire. Ce travail relativise l’importance du clampage pédiculaire et du temps d’ischémie qui n’étaient pas significativement liés au risque d’IR dans notre étude.
|
|
| 4. |
- Verhoest, G, et al.
(author)
-
Predictive factors of chronic kidney disease stage V after partial nephrectomy in a solitary kidney : a multi-institutional study
- 2014
-
In: Urologic Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1078-1439 .- 1873-2496. ; 32:1, s. 28.e21-28.e26
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Partial Nephrectomy (PN) in a solitary kidney is at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage V and/or haemodialysis (HD). Our objective was to determine predictive factors of CKD stage V in this population. MATERIAL & METHODS: Data from 300 patients were retrospectively collected from 16 tertiary centres. Clinical and operative parameters, tumor characteristics and renal function before surgery were analyzed. Patients with and without CKD stage V (defined as MDRD<15ml/min) were compared using χ2 and Student-t tests for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Predictive factors of CKD stage V were evaluated with a multivariable analysis using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Median age and BMI were 63 years old and 26kg/m², respectively. Most of the patients (65%) were male with an anatomic solitary kidney (88.3%). Median tumor size was 4cm and 98% were malignant tumors. Median operative time, blood loss and clamping time were 180min, 350ml and 20min respectively. Renal cooling was used in 19.3% and clamping of the pedicle was performed in 61.6%. Twenty five patients (8.5%) presented post operative CKD stage V at last follow-up and 18 underwent HD (6%) post-operatively because of acute renal insufficiency. There was no difference between CKD stage V and non CKD stage V patients concerning Charlson index, operative time (180min vs 179min, p= 0.39), blood loss (475ml vs 350ml, p= 0.51), use of renal cooling and type of clamping. Patients with CKD stage V were older (70 vs 63 years old, p= 0.005), had a lower baseline renal function (clearance MDRD 41 vs. 62ml/min, p<0.0001) and an increased tumor size (p= 0.02). Complications occurred in 91 patients (30%) with 16% of minor (Clavien 1-2) and 14% of major (Clavien>2) complications, respectively. In multivariable analysis, baseline MDRD, BMI, and the occurrence of a minor complication were independent predictive factors of post operative CKD stage V. CONCLUSION: PN in a solitary kidney is at risk of post-operative CKD stage V and HD. Pre-operative altered renal function and post operative complications are the main predictive factors of permanent CKD stage V.
|
|
