SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:esh-2548"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:esh-2548" > The structural prop...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Björkdahl, Ann,1959-Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Clinical Neurosciences,Rehabiliteringsmedicin, Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborgs Universitet (author)

The structural properties of the European Brain Injury Questionnaire.

  • Article/chapterEnglish2004

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2004
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:esh-2548
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:esh:diva-2548URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.04.004DOI
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/58529URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the reliability and validity of the European Brain Injury Questionnaire as an evaluation tool in a stroke population by applying the Rasch methodology.METHODS: The European Brain Injury Questionnaire was distributed to 54 patients with stroke and 36 next of kin at discharge from the rehabilitation ward and at a 1-year follow-up. Rasch analysis was used for evaluating the psychometric characteristic and the quality of the measures produced with focus on reliability and validity. The reliability was determined by the separation. The construct validity was determined by examining the hierarchy of the tasks and by evaluating the fit of individual tasks to the latent construct. Analyses of differences across occasions, and across patients and next of kin, were made to examine the stability of the instrument.RESULTS: The reliability was good as the instrument met the criteria for separation. Two items at discharge and 5 items at 1-year follow-up were misfits. If not more than 5% of the items fail to fit the Rasch model the instrument can be considered unidimensional, which in this case only concerned the 1-year follow-up. The instrument was stable over time and across patients and next of kin.CONCLUSION: With some alterations the European Brain Injury Questionnaire seems to be a useful instrument in clinical practice and research, and a help to capture the social, emotional, and cognitive impacts of a stroke.

Subject headings and genre

  • Psychological adaptation
  • Rasch analysis
  • Rehabilitation outcome
  • Stroke
  • Psychological adaptation; Rasch analysis; rehabilitation outcome; stroke

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Lundgren Nilsson, Åsa,1965Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Clinical Neurosciences,Rehabiliteringsmedicin, Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborgs Universitet(Swepub:gu)xlusaf (author)
  • Stibrant Sunnerhagen, Katharina,1957Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Clinical Neurosciences,Rehabiliteringsmedicin, Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborgs Universitet(Swepub:gu)xstika (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för klinisk neurovetenskap (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases: Elsevier BV13:3, s. 122-1281052-30571532-8511

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view