Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:gih-2971" >
Acute hamstring inj...
Acute hamstring injuries in Swedish elite football : a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation protocols.
-
- Askling, Carl M (författare)
- Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan,Laboratoriet för biomekanik och motorisk kontroll (BMC)
-
Tengvar, Magnus (författare)
-
- Thorstensson, Alf (författare)
- Gymnastik- och idrottshögskolan,Laboratoriet för biomekanik och motorisk kontroll (BMC)
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2013-03-27
- 2013
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Sports Medicine. - : BMJ. - 0306-3674 .- 1473-0480. ; 47:15, s. 953-9
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://bjsm.bmj.com...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
http://kipublication...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- BACKGROUND: Hamstring injury is the single most common injury in European professional football and, therefore, time to return and secondary prevention are of particular concern.OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two rehabilitation protocols after acute hamstring injury in Swedish elite football players by evaluating time needed to return to full participation in football team-training and availability for match selection.STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomised comparison of two rehabilitation protocols.METHODS: Seventy-five football players with an acute hamstring injury, verified by MRI, were randomly assigned to one of two rehabilitation protocols. Thirty-seven players were assigned to a protocol emphasising lengthening exercises, L-protocol and 38 players to a protocol consisting of conventional exercises, C-protocol. The outcome measure was the number of days to return to full-team training and availability for match selection. Reinjuries were registered during a period of 12 months after return.RESULTS: Time to return was significantly shorter for the players in the L-protocol, mean 28 days (1SD±15, range 8-58 days), compared with the C-protocol, mean 51 days (1SD±21, range 12-94 days). Irrespective of protocol, stretching-type of hamstring injury took significantly longer time to return than sprinting-type, L-protocol: mean 43 vs 23 days and C-protocol: mean 74 vs 41 days, respectively. The L-protocol was significantly more effective than the C-protocol in both injury types. One reinjury was registered, in the C-protocol.CONCLUSIONS: A rehabilitation protocol emphasising lengthening type of exercises is more effective than a protocol containing conventional exercises in promoting time to return in Swedish elite football.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Idrottsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Sport and Fitness Sciences (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Medicin/Teknik
- Medicine/Technology
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas