SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hig-27842"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hig-27842" > The effects of stim...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

The effects of stimulus complexity and conceptual fluency on aesthetic judgments of abstract art : Evidence for a default–interventionist account

Ball, Linden J. (author)
University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Threadgold, Emma (author)
University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Marsh, John E. (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Miljöpsykologi,University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
show more...
Christensen, Bo T. (author)
Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-08
2018
English.
In: Metaphor and Symbol. - : Routledge. - 1092-6488 .- 1532-7868. ; 33:3, s. 235-252
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • We report an experiment investigating how stimulus complexity and conceptual fluency (i.e., the ease of deriving meaning) influence aesthetic liking judgments for abstract artworks. We presented participants with paintings at two levels of complexity (high vs. low) and five levels of conceptual fluency (determined from a prior norming study) and requested separate ratings of beauty and creativity. Our predictions were derived from the PIA Model (Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking), which views aesthetic preferences as being formed by two, distinct fluency-based processes: an initial, automatic, stimulus-driven, default process and a subsequent, perceiver-driven deliberative process. A key trigger for deliberative processing is assumed to be disfluency at the default stage, as caused by factors such as visual complexity. We predicted that complexity and conceptual fluency would interact in determining aesthetic liking, with people preferring complex stimuli, but only when these are relatively easy to process conceptually. Our results supported this prediction for beauty judgments, although creativity judgments showed a curiously uniform profile. Nevertheless, the predictive capacity of the PIA Model in relation to beauty judgments attests to the explanatory strength of this default?interventionist theory of aesthetic liking. We conclude by noting important parallels between the PIA Model and the Revised Optimal Innovation Hypothesis, which likewise has broad reach in explaining how defaultness and non-defaultness affect pleasure across a range of linguistic and pictorial stimuli.

Subject headings

HUMANIORA  -- Språk och litteratur -- Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Languages and Literature -- General Language Studies and Linguistics (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

inget Strategiskt forskningsområde (SFO)
no Strategic Research Area (SFO)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Ball, Linden J.
Threadgold, Emma
Marsh, John E.
Christensen, Bo ...
About the subject
HUMANITIES
HUMANITIES
and Languages and Li ...
and General Language ...
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
Articles in the publication
Metaphor and Sym ...
By the university
University of Gävle

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view