SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:his-12122"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:his-12122" > A New Look at Indiv...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

A New Look at Individual Differences in Perceptions of Unfairness : The Theory of Maximally Unfair Allocations in Multiparty Situations

Eriksson, Kimmo (author)
Stockholms universitet,Mälardalens högskola,Utbildningsvetenskap och Matematik,Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden,Mathematics and Applied Mathematics,School of Education, Culture and Communication, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden,Centrum för evolutionär kulturforskning
Kazemi, Ali (author)
Högskolan i Skövde,Institutionen för hälsa och lärande,Forskningsspecialiseringen Hälsa och Lärande,Kvinna, barn och familj (WomFam), Woman, Child and Family,University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
Törnblom, Kjell (author)
ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-10-29
2015
English.
In: Social Justice Research. - New York : Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. - 0885-7466 .- 1573-6725. ; 28:4, s. 401-414
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Previous research has demonstrated that unfairness judgments of resource allocations become more complex when there are more than two recipients. In order to explain some of this complexity, we propose a set of psychological mechanisms that may underlie four different choices of maximally unfair resource allocations (MUA): Self-Single-Loser, Self-One-Loser-of-Many, Self-Single-Winner, and Self-One-Winner-of-Many. From this psychological theory, several predictions are derived and tested in vignette studies involving a total of 708 participants recruited online using MTurk. As predicted by our theory, (1) choices of MUA where there is a single loser were much more common when the allocated resource was of negative rather than positive valence, and (2) the amount of egoistic bias individuals exhibited when judging the unfairness in receiving a small rather than a large share in a non-extreme multi-party allocation was predicted by their choices of MUA. These findings suggest that an individual’s choice of MUA reveals some generally relevant principles of how unfairness is perceived in multi-party allocations. This opens up new lines of inquiry, especially regarding research on social dilemmas and social value orientation.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi -- Socialpsykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology -- Social Psychology (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi -- Tillämpad psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology -- Applied Psychology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Matematik -- Annan matematik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Mathematics -- Other Mathematics (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Unfairness
Distributive justice
Inequality
Multi-party allocation
Egoistic bias
Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Kvinna, barn och familj (WomFam)
Mathematics/Applied Mathematics

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Eriksson, Kimmo
Kazemi, Ali
Törnblom, Kjell
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
and Psychology
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Sociology
and Social Psycholog ...
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
and Applied Psycholo ...
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Mathematics
and Other Mathematic ...
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Sociology
Articles in the publication
Social Justice R ...
By the university
University of Skövde
Mälardalen University
Stockholm University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view