SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hkr-10062"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hkr-10062" > Fatigue in Parkinso...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease : measurement properties of a generic and a condition-specific rating scale

Nilsson, Maria (author)
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Bladh, Stina (author)
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Hagell, Peter (author)
Högskolan Kristianstad,Avdelningen för Hälsovetenskap,Forskningsmiljön PRO-CARE, Patient Reported Outcomes - Clinical Assessment Research and Education
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013
2013
English.
In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. - 0885-3924 .- 1873-6513. ; 46:5, s. 737-746
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Context: High quality fatigue rating scales are needed to advance understanding of fatigue nd determine the efficacy of interventions. Several fatigue scales are used in Parkinson’s isease, but few have been tested using modern psychometric methodology (Rasch analysis).Objectives: To examine the measuring properties of the generic Functional Assessment of hronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale and the condition-specific 16-item arkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) using Rasch analysis.Methods: Postal survey data (n=150; 47% women; mean age, 70) were Rasch analyzed. FS-16 scores were tested according both to the original polytomous and the suggested lternative dichotomized scoring methods.Results: The PFS-16 showed overall Rasch model fit whereas the FACIT-F showed signs of isfit, which probably was due to a sleepiness-related item and mixing of ositively/negatively worded items. There was no differential tem functioning by disease uration but by fatigue status (greater likelihood of needing to sleep or rest during the day mong people classified as non-fatigued) in the PFS-16 and FACIT-F. However, this did not mpact total score based estimated person measures. Targeting and reliability (≥0.86) was ood, but the dichotomized PFS-16 showed compromised measurement precision. olytomous and dichotomized PFS-16 and FACIT-F scores identified 6, 3 and 4 statistically istinct sample strata, respectively.Conclusion: We found general support for the measurement properties of both scales. owever, polytomous PFS-16 scores exhibited advantages compared to dichotomous PFS-16 nd FACIT-F scores. Dichotomization of item responses compromises measurement recision and ability to separate people, and should be avoided.

Subject headings

MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskaper (hsv//swe)

Keyword

Fatigue
Parkinson’s disease
Rasch model
rating scales
reliability
validity

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Nilsson, Maria
Bladh, Stina
Hagell, Peter
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
Articles in the publication
Journal of Pain ...
By the university
Kristianstad University College

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view