SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-26703"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-26703" > Whispering :

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Whispering : A Single-Subject Study of Glottal Configuration and Aerodynamics

Sundberg, Johan (author)
KTH,Musikakustik
Scherer, Ronald (author)
Department of Communication Disorders, Bowling Green State University
Hess, Markus (author)
Department of Phoniatrics and Paedaudiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg
show more...
Müller, Frank (author)
Department of Phoniatrics and Paedaudiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University of Hamburg
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2010
2010
English.
In: Journal of Voice. - : Elsevier BV. - 0892-1997 .- 1873-4588. ; 24:5, s. 574-584
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Whisper productions were produced by a single adult male subject over a wide range of subglottal pressures, glottal areas, and glottal flows. Dimensional measurements were made of these three variables, including glottal perimeter. Subglottal pressure was directly obtained by a pressure transducer in a tracheal catheter, and wide-band flow with a pneumotach mask. Four types of whispers were used-hyperfunctional, hypofunctional, neutral, and postphonation-in addition to three levels of loudness (soft, medium, loud). Sequences of the /pae/ syllable were used. Video recordings of the larynx were made. The glottis was outlined by hand with extrapolation for unseen parts, and area and perimeter were obtained through image analysis software. The whisper tokens resulted in the following wide ranges: subglottal pressure: 1.3-17 cm H2O; glottal flow: 0.9-1.71 L/s; glottal area: 0.065-1.76 cm(2); and glottal perimeter: 1.09-6.55 cm. Hyperfunctional whisper tended to have higher subglottal pressures and lower areas and flows than hypofunctional whisper, with neutral and postphonation whisper values in between. An important finding is that glottal flow changed more for small changes of area when the area was already small, and did not create much flow change when area was changed for already larger areas; that is, whisper is "more sensitive" to airflow changes for smaller glottal areas. A general equation for whisper aerodynamics was obtained, namely, P (subglottal pressure [cm H2O]) = C x F (glottal flow [cm(3)/s]), where C = 0.052 x A(4) - 0.1913 x A(3) + 0.2577 x A(2) - 0.1523 x A + 0.0388, where A is the glottal area (cm(2)). Another general equation for nondimensional terms (pressure coefficient vs Reynolds number) also is offered. Implications for whisper flow resistance and aerodynamic power are given. These results give insight into whisper aerodynamics and offer equations relevant to speech synthesis.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Oto-rhino-laryngologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Otorhinolaryngology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Whisper
Subglottal pressure
Glottal airflow
Glottal flow
Glottal area
Glottal resistance
Glottal flow resistance
Subglottal power
Pressure coefficient
Reynolds number
Otorhinolaryngology
Otorhinolaryngologi

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Sundberg, Johan
Scherer, Ronald
Hess, Markus
Müller, Frank
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Otorhinolaryngol ...
Articles in the publication
Journal of Voice
By the university
Royal Institute of Technology

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view