Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-272836" >
Subject(s) matter :
Subject(s) matter : A grounded theory of technology teachers’ conceptions of the purpose of teaching technology
-
- Doyle, Andrew, 1992- (author)
- KTH,Lärande
-
- Seery, Niall (author)
- KTH,Lärande,Athlone Institute of Technology, Athlone, Ireland.
-
- Gumaelius, Lena, 1967- (author)
- KTH,Lärande
-
show more...
-
- Canty, Donal (author)
- University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
-
- Hartell, Eva, 1973- (author)
- KTH,Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM)
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- English.
- Related links:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Technology education internationally has for some time struggled to achieve continuity between what is depicted in policy and curricular documents and the reality of day-to-day practices. With its focus often articulated through the nature of activity students are to engage with, technology teachers are recognised as having significantly more autonomy in the design and implementation of their practices than teachers of other subjects. From this, it is important to understand the role of teachers’ beliefs about technology education and subsequently, how their beliefs may influence enacted practices. As such, this study sought to investigate teachers’ conceptions of the purpose of teaching technology through reflection on their enacted practices. A constructivist grounded theory methodology was employed for the design of the study and analysis of data. According to our analysis, despite similarities between the nature of student activity that interviewees designed and implemented, interviewees represented the purpose of the subject in different ways. Three different conceptions of the purpose of teaching technology were identified; obtaining knowledge and skills for application, ability to act in a technological way, and ability to think in a technological way. Central to the three conceptions were contentions in the representations of what constituted subject matter knowledge in the subject, and the role that different application cases played in teaching technology. Without consideration and explicit articulation of the purposes for teaching technology, this lack of clarity and differences in rationale for teaching technology are likely to continue.
Subject headings
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Didaktik (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Educational Sciences -- Didactics (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Lärande (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Educational Sciences -- Learning (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Pedagogiskt arbete (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Educational Sciences -- Pedagogical Work (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Pedagogik (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Educational Sciences -- Pedagogy (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- Teacher conceptions; technology education; enacted practice; Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK); constructivist grounded theory.
- Teknikvetenskapens lärande och kommunikation
- Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences
Publication and Content Type
- vet (subject category)
- ovr (subject category)
To the university's database