Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-341688" >
Engineering educati...
Engineering education research : reviewing journal manuscripts fairly, constructively, effectively
-
- Edström, Kristina, 1963- (author)
- KTH,Lärande i Stem
-
- Knight, D. (author)
- Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
-
- Main, J. (author)
- Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
-
show more...
-
- Mitchell, J. (author)
- University College London, London, UK
-
- Bernhard, J. (author)
- Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
-
- Chance, S. (author)
- TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
-
- Beagon, U. (author)
- TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
-
- van den Bogaard, M. (author)
- The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, USA
-
- Broadbent, R. (author)
- Aston University, Birmingham, UK
-
- Du, X. (author)
- Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
-
- Langie, G. (author)
- KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
-
- Martin, D. (author)
- TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
-
- Power, J. (author)
- University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
-
- Saunders, F. (author)
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
-
- Tormey, R. (author)
- EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2023
- 2023
- English.
-
In: SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. - : European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). ; , s. 3144-3151
- Related links:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
show more...
-
https://doi.org/10.2...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Peer review is the mechanism for quality control in academic journals. When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, the editors invite other researchers - peers - to review it anonymously. The reviews should serve to support the journal editors in making decisions, and to support the authors in improving the manuscripts before publication. Therefore, reviews need to be fair and constructive. As reviewing can also take considerable effort, it is useful for the reviewer to consider how to do it effectively. Given the important role of peer review in a field, and the considerable effort it takes, it is valuable to jointly consider all these aspects of reviewing in a dialogue with reviewers, authors and editors. This paper presents the outcomes of such a dialogue with 49 participants in the field of engineering education research.
Subject headings
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap -- Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Media and Communications -- Information Studies (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- Engineering Education Research
- Journal
- Peer review
- Reviewer
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- kon (subject category)
To the university's database
- By the author/editor
-
Edström, Kristin ...
-
Knight, D.
-
Main, J.
-
Mitchell, J.
-
Bernhard, J.
-
Chance, S.
-
show more...
-
Beagon, U.
-
van den Bogaard, ...
-
Broadbent, R.
-
Du, X.
-
Langie, G.
-
Martin, D.
-
Power, J.
-
Saunders, F.
-
Tormey, R.
-
show less...
- About the subject
-
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
-
SOCIAL SCIENCES
-
and Media and Commun ...
-
and Information Stud ...
- Articles in the publication
- SEFI 2023 - 51st ...
- By the university
-
Royal Institute of Technology