SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-112312"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-112312" > Age, prognostic imp...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Age, prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block, and utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: findings from 14713 patients in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

Lund, Lars H. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Benson, Lina (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Stahlberg, Marcus (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show more...
Braunschweig, Frieder (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Edner, Magnus (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Dahlström, Ulf (author)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Kardiologiska kliniken US
Linde, Cecilia (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-09-08
2014
English.
In: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B / Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 16:10, s. 1073-1081
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • AimsAge is not a contraindication to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the prevalence and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) and left bundle branch block (LBBB), as well as CRT utilization, may differ with age. We tested the hypotheses that in the elderly: (i) IVCD and LBBB are more prevalent, (ii) IVCD and LBBB are more harmful, and (iii) CRT is underutilized. Methods and resultsWe studied 14713 patients with ejection fraction 39% in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry and divided into age groups 65years, 66-80years and greater than80years. Among 13782 patients without CRT, IVCD was present in the three age groups in 11% vs. 15% vs. 19% and LBBB was present in 20% vs. 27% vs. 28%, respectively, (Pless than0.001). The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 29 (12-53) months for IVCD vs. narrow QRS was 1.31 (1.06-1.63, P=0.013) in the 65year group, 1.32 (1.17-1.47, Pless than0.001) in the 66-80year group, and 1.26 (1.21-1.41, pless than0.001) in the greater than80year group. For LBBB vs. narrow QRS it was 1.29 (1.07-1.56, P=0.009), 1.17 (1.06-1.30, P=0.002), and 1.10 (0.99-1.22, P=0.091), respectively. The adjusted P for interaction between age and QRS morphology was 0.664. In the three age groups, CRT was present in 6% vs. 8% vs. 4% and absent but with indication in 23% vs. 32% vs. 37%, respectively (Pless than0.001). ConclusionsBoth IVCD and LBBB were more common with increasing age and were similarly strong independent predictors of mortality and in all ages. The underutilization of CRT was worse with increasing age.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Age; Heart Failure; QRS width; Left bundle branch block; Intraventricular conduction delay; Epidemiology; Cardiac resynchronization therapy

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view