SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-113029"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-113029" > Comparison of the S...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Comparison of the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)

Cöster, Maria (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedi - klinisk och molekylär osteoporosforskning,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Orthopedics - Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research,Lund University Research Groups,Lund University, Sweden; Lund University, Sweden; Hand Foot Surg Centre, Sweden,Departments of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Rosengren, Björn (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedi - klinisk och molekylär osteoporosforskning,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Orthopedics - Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research,Lund University Research Groups,Departments of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Sweden
Bremander, Ann (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedi, Lund,Sektion III,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Orthopaedics (Lund),Section III,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Departments of Rheumatology and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
show more...
Brudin, Lars (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Department of Clinical Physiology, Kalmar Hospital, Kalmar and Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
Karlsson, Magnus (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedi - klinisk och molekylär osteoporosforskning,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Orthopedics - Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research,Lund University Research Groups,Departments of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-07-11
2014
English.
In: Foot & ankle international. - Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE Publications (UK and US): 12 month Embargo. - 1071-1007 .- 1944-7876. ; 35:10, s. 1031-1036
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: The Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is a patient-reported outcome measure, while the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) is a clinician-based score, both used for evaluation of foot and ankle disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of these 2 scoring systems. Methods: A total of 95 patients with great toe disorders and 111 patients with ankle or hindfoot disorders completed the 2 scores before and after surgery. We evaluated time to complete the scores in seconds, correlations between scores with Spearmans correlation coefficient (r(s)), floor and ceiling effects by proportion of individuals who reached the minimum or maximum values, test-retest reliability and interobserver reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency by Cronbachs coefficient alpha (CA), and responsiveness by effect size (ES). Data are provided as correlation coefficients, means, and standard deviations. Results: SEFAS was completed 3 times faster than AOFAS. The scores correlated with an r(s) of .49 for great toe disorders and .67 for ankle/hindfoot disorders (both P less than .001). None of the scores had any floor or ceiling effect. SEFAS test-retest ICC values measured 1 week apart were .89 for great toe and .92 for ankle/hindfoot disorders, while the corresponding ICC values for AOFAS were .57 and .75. AOFAS interobserver reliability ICC values were .70 for great toe and .81 for ankle/hindfoot disorders. SEFAS CA values were .85 for great toe and .86 for ankle/hindfoot disorders, while the corresponding CA values for AOFAS were .15 and .42. SEFAS ES values were 1.15 for great toe and 1.39 for ankle/hindfoot disorders, while the corresponding ES values for AOFAS were 1.05 and 1.73. Conclusion: As SEFAS showed similar or better outcome in our tests and was completed 3 times faster than AOFAS, we recommend SEFAS for evaluation of patients with foot and ankle disorders.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Ortopedi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Orthopaedics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

ankle; AOFAS; comparison; foot; hindfoot; reliability; responsiveness; SEFAS; score; validity

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view