SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-115936"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-115936" > Static and dynamic ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Tagesson (Sonesson), Sofi (author)
Linköpings universitet,Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Ortopedkliniken i Linköping,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten
Öberg, Birgitta (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten
Kvist, Joanna (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-09-27
2015
English.
In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. - : Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 23:12, s. 3691-3697
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • PURPOSE: To evaluate static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To explore whether static and dynamic tibial translation are correlated.METHODS: Ten patients undergoing quadruple hamstring tendon graft ACL reconstruction were evaluated before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. Sagittal tibial translation was measured during the Lachman test (static translation) and during gait (dynamic translation) using a CA-4000 electrogoniometer.RESULTS: Five years after ACL reconstruction, static tibial translation did not differ between knees (Lachman test 90 N and 134 N n.s.). In contrast, there was greater maximal anterior tibial translation during gait in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees (5.5 ± 1.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 mm, P = 0.028). There were no differences in static or dynamic tibial translation between the 5-year follow-up and before ACL reconstruction or between the 5-year follow-up and the 5-week follow-up. There were no correlations between static and dynamic tibial translation.CONCLUSION: Although static tibial translation did not differ between knees 5 years after ACL reconstruction, dynamic tibial translation during gait was greater in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees. Neither static nor dynamic tibial translation changed 5 years after ACL reconstruction as compared to before surgery and 5 weeks after surgery. Static tibial translation did not correlate with dynamic tibial translation.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study indicates that although the knee is stable during static measurements, kinematics during gait is impaired 5 years after ACL reconstruction. This may affect the return to sport and risk of osteoarthritis.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Sjukgymnastik (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Physiotherapy (hsv//eng)

Keyword

ACL; Reconstruction; Knee laxity; Knee kinematics; Functional joint stability

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Tagesson (Soness ...
Öberg, Birgitta
Kvist, Joanna
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
and Physiotherapy
Articles in the publication
Knee Surgery, Sp ...
By the university
Linköping University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view