Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-182515" >
Comparison of Sampl...
-
Araujo, Mario JorgeUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
Comparison of Sample Preparation Methods for Shotgun Proteomic Studies in Aquaculture Species
- Article/chapterEnglish2021
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
2021-11-16
-
MDPI,2021
-
electronicrdacarrier
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-182515
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-182515URI
-
https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes9040046DOI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Funding Agencies|European Union (Interreg POCTEP, project ACUINANO) [07-12-ACUINANO_1_E]; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia; FCT)Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020]; European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)European Commission
-
Proteomics has been recently introduced in aquaculture research, and more methodological studies are needed to improve the quality of proteomics studies. Therefore, this work aims to compare three sample preparation methods for shotgun LC-MS/MS proteomics using tissues of two aquaculture species: liver of turbot Scophthalmus maximus and hepatopancreas of Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. We compared the three most common sample preparation workflows for shotgun analysis: filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), suspension-trapping (S-Trap), and solid-phase-enhanced sample preparations (SP3). FASP showed the highest number of protein identifications for turbot samples, and S-Trap outperformed other methods for mussel samples. Subsequent functional analysis revealed a large number of Gene Ontology (GO) terms in turbot liver proteins (nearly 300 GO terms), while fewer GOs were found in mussel proteins (nearly 150 GO terms for FASP and S-Trap and 107 for SP3). This result may reflect the poor annotation of the genomic information in this specific group of animals. FASP was confirmed as the most consistent method for shotgun proteomic studies; however, the use of the other two methods might be important in specific experimental conditions (e.g., when samples have a very low amount of protein).
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Sousa, Maria LigiaUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Felpeto, Aldo BarreiroUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Turkina, Maria V,1973-Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för neurobiologi,Medicinska fakulteten(Swepub:liu)martu07
(author)
-
Fonseca, ElzaUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Martins, Jose CarlosUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Vasconcelos, VitorUniv Porto, Portugal; Univ Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Campos, AlexandreUniv Porto, Portugal
(author)
-
Univ Porto, PortugalAvdelningen för neurobiologi
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Proteomes: MDPI9:42227-7382
Internet link
Find in a library
-
Proteomes
(Search for host publication in LIBRIS)
To the university's database