SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-187412"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-187412" > Health outcomes in ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Health outcomes in primary care: a 20-year evidence map of randomized controlled trials

Missiou, Aristea (author)
Univ Ioannina, Greece
Lionis, Christos (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för prevention, rehabilitering och nära vård,Medicinska fakulteten,Univ Crete, Greece
Evangelou, Evangelos (author)
Univ Ioannina, Greece; Imperial Coll London, England
show more...
Tatsioni, Athina (author)
Univ Ioannina, Greece
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-07-09
2023
English.
In: Family Practice. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 0263-2136 .- 1460-2229. ; 40:1, s. 128-137
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objective To quantify the different types of health outcomes assessed as primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the primary care (PC) setting during the last 20 years and identify whether potential gaps exist in specific types of health care and types of intervention. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from January 2000 to September 2020 for published RCTs in PC. We recorded characteristics of eligible studies and mapped evidence by health outcome category (patient health outcomes, health services outcomes); and for each outcome category, by types of health care (preventive, acute, chronic, palliative), and by types of intervention (drug, behavioural, on structure, and on process). For RCTs assessing patient health outcomes as primary outcomes, we further mapped using the quality-of-care dimensions, that is, effectiveness, safety, and patient-centredness. Results Of the 518 eligible RCTs in PC, 357 (68.9%) evaluated a patient health outcome as the primary outcome, and 161 (31.1%) evaluated only health services outcomes as primary outcomes. Many focused on population with chronic illness (224 trials; 43.2%) and evaluated interventions on processes of health care (239 trials; 46.1%). Research gaps identified include preventive and palliative care, behavioural interventions, and safety and patient-centredness outcomes as primary outcomes. Conclusion Our evidence map showed research gaps in certain types of health care and interventions. It also showed research gaps in assessing safety and measures to place patient at the centre of health care delivery as primary outcomes.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Allmänmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- General Practice (hsv//eng)

Keyword

evidence-based practice; outcome assessment; primary health care; quality of health care; randomized controlled trial; systematic review

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Missiou, Aristea
Lionis, Christos
Evangelou, Evang ...
Tatsioni, Athina
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and General Practice
Articles in the publication
Family Practice
By the university
Linköping University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view