SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-187890"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-187890" > Designing and Imple...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force

Oortwijn, Wija (author)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Netherlands
Husereau, Don (author)
Univ Ottawa, Canada
Abelson, Julia (author)
McMaster Univ, Canada
show more...
Barasa, Edwine (author)
KEMRI Wellcome Trust Res Programme, Kenya
Bayani, Diana (Dana) (author)
Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore
Santos, Vania Canuto (author)
Minist Hlth, Brazil
Culyer, Anthony (author)
Univ York, England
Facey, Karen (author)
Evidence Based Health Policy Consultant, Drymen, Scotland
Grainger, David (author)
Biointelect, Australia
Kieslich, Katharina (author)
Univ Vienna, Austria
Ollendorf, Daniel (author)
Tufts Univ, MA USA
Pichon-Riviere, Andres (author)
Univ Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sandman, Lars (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhälle och hälsa,Medicinska fakulteten,National Centre for Priorities in Health
Strammiello, Valentina (author)
European Patients Forum, Belgium
Teerawattananon, Yot (author)
Minist Hlth, Thailand
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2022
2022
English.
In: Value in Health. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1098-3015 .- 1524-4733. ; 25:6, s. 869-886
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives: Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate participatory decision making, using discussion and open dialogue between stakeholders. Increasing attention is being given to deliberative processes, but guidance is lacking for those who wish to design or use them. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) and ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research initiated a joint Task Force to address this gap. Methods: The joint Task Force consisted of 15 members with different backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise relevant to the field. It developed guidance and a checklist for deliberative processes for HTA. The guidance builds upon the few, existing initiatives in the field, as well as input from the HTA community following an established consultation plan. In addition, the guidance was subject to 2 rounds of peer review. Results: A deliberative process for HTA consists of procedures, activities, and events that support the informed and critical examination of an issue and the weighing of arguments and evidence to guide a subsequent decision. Guidance and an accompanying checklist are provided for (i) developing the governance and structure of an HTA program and (ii) informing how the various stages of an HTA process might be managed using deliberation. Conclusions: The guidance and the checklist contain a series of questions, grouped by 6 phases of a model deliberative process. They are offered as practical tools for those wishing to establish or improve deliberative processes for HTA that are fit for local contexts. The tools can also be used for independent scrutiny of deliberative processes.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Keyword

health technology assessment; deliberative processes; guidance; stakeholders; participation

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view