Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-20094" >
Historical Responsi...
-
Friman (Fridahl), Mathias,1980-Linköpings universitet,Centrum för klimatpolitisk forskning,Tema vatten i natur och samhälle,Filosofiska fakulteten
(author)
Historical Responsibility in the UNFCCC
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
Norrköping :Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research,2007
-
70 s.
-
electronicrdacarrier
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-20094
-
ISBN:9789185715039
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-20094URI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:rap swepub-publicationtype
Series
-
CSPR Report (Centrum för klimatpolitisk forskning),1654-1529 ;07:01
Notes
-
This report tracks the history of historical responsibility in negotiations to and under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The concept aims at attributing individual country burdens in mitigating climate change based on the relative levels of past emissions. A hermeneutic approach and discursive theory has been applied to the empirical material consisting of documents form the main bodies of the UNFCCC. The historic narrative constitutes a basis for an analysis of how the UNFCCC framing of historical responsibility have affected discussions on equity and inclusiveness across the North-South divide. Even though the concept was part of the discursive struggle over the content of the UNFCCC, it has been more central in the struggle to make the principles on equity, established in the Convention, operational. Historical responsibility has been most elaborated in a proposal by Brazil to the 1997 pre-Kyoto negotiations. This proposal combined a biophysical approach (preferred by the North) with that of a political economic approach (preferred by the South). However, the proposal was soon pushed off the central agenda and discussions on the topic turned technical and centred on scientific uncertainties. The biophysical framing excluded discussions on equity. As the proposal was marginalised within UNFCCC as a whole it became central in discussions on comprehensive approaches to historical responsibility. Any who wanted to discuss comprehensive approaches were referred to this forum wherein talks on equity were excluded by rules of discussion. This echoes a world system with a periphery in the global South dependent upon core countries in the global North. The last mentioned have the capacity to set the agenda. The resulting discursive rules, excluding talks on equity, have not been good to the inclusiveness of Southern participants in the discussion process nor favoured much needed dialogue across the North/South divide in climate change negotiations.
Subject headings and genre
-
SOCIAL SCIENCES
-
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Linköpings universitetCentrum för klimatpolitisk forskning
(creator_code:org_t)
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database