SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-22030"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-22030" > Methods of choice f...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Methods of choice for diagnostic antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening : Benefit of adding antigen-specific assays to immunofluorescence microscopy

Dahle, Charlotte, 1956- (author)
Linköpings universitet,Hälsouniversitetet,Klinisk immunologi
Skogh, Thomas, 1952- (author)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Hälsouniversitetet,Reumatologi,Länskliniken för Reumatologi i Östergötland
Åberg, A K (author)
Örebro
show more...
Jalal, A (author)
Örebro
Olcén, Per, 1943- (author)
Linköpings universitet,Hälsouniversitetet,Klinisk mikrobiologi
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2004
2004
English.
In: Journal of Autoimmunity. - : Elsevier BV. - 0896-8411 .- 1095-9157. ; 22:3, s. 241-248
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives. To evaluate and compare the performances of three enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs) and a double radial immunodiffusion (DRID) test in addition to immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy for routine laboratory screening of patient sera sent for antinuclear antibody (ANA) analysis. Methods. 3079 consecutive patient sera sent for routine testing of ANA were analysed by IF microscopy on HEp-2 cells (IF-ANA), three different ANA-EIAs, and a DRID test for antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens. The IF-ANA and DRID tests were regarded as reference methods. Results. By IF-ANA and/or DRID, 375 sera (12%) turned out ANA-positive. A further 171 sera (6%) were positive by EIA, but could not be confirmed either by IF microscopy or DRID. 32 of the 375 ANA-positive (9%) sera were negative by IF microscopy, but had precipitating antibodies against Ro/SS-A (52 and/or 60 kD). Conclusions. Different assays for ANA analysis give overlapping results to a certain extent, but are by no means interchangeable. Thus, different ANA tests reflect different aspects of these autoantibodies. The diagnostic utility of ANA testing still mainly refers to IF-microscopy and precipitin tests. IF-ANA should not be abandoned as the golden standard in clinical routine, until diagnostic and classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases have been revised. However, in addition we strongly advocate that a specific test for anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies is always included.

Keyword

MEDICINE
MEDICIN

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view