SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-58654"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-58654" > Self-reported versu...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis

Cuijpers, Pim (author)
Vrije University Amsterdam
Li, Juan (author)
Chinese Academy of Science
Hofmann, Stefan G (author)
Boston University
show more...
Andersson, Gerhard (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för klinisk och socialpsykologi (CS),Filosofiska fakulteten
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. 2010
2010
English.
In: CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW. - : Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.. - 0272-7358 .- 1873-7811. ; 30:6, s. 768-778
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • It is not well-known whether self-report measures and clinician-rated instruments for depression result in comparable outcomes in research on psychotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis in which randomized controlled trials were included examining the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Only studies were included in which both a self-report and a clinician-rated instrument were used. We calculated the effect size (Hedges g) based on the self-report measures, the effect size based on the clinician-rated instruments, and the difference between these two effect sizes (Delta g). A total of 48 studies including a total of 2462 participants was included in the meta-analysis. The differential effect size was Delta g=0.20 (95% CI: 0.10-0.30), indicating that clinician-rated instruments resulted in a significantly higher effect size than self-report instruments from the same studies. When we limited the effect size analysis to those studies comparing the HRSD with the BDI, the differential effect was somewhat smaller, but still statistically significant (Delta g=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.27). This meta-analysis has made it clear that clinician-rated and self-report measures of improvement following psychotherapy for depression are not equivalent. Different symptoms may be more suitable for self-report or ratings by clinicians and in clinical trials it is probably best to include both.

Keyword

Depression
Major depression
Meta-analysis
Self-report
Clinician-rated
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view