onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-62293"
Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-62293" > Comparing a multi-l...
- 1 of 1
- Previous record
- Next record
- To hitlist
- A Herrera, INorwegian University Science and Technology NTNU,Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (author)
Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis
- Article/chapterEnglish2010
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
- London, UK :Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.2010
- printrdacarrier
Numbers
- LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-62293
- https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62293URI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003DOI
- https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17595URI
Supplementary language notes
- Language:English
- Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
- SwePubSwePub
Classification
Notes
- Accident models and analysis methods affect what accident investigators look for, which contributory factors are found, and which recommendations are issued. This paper contrasts the Sequentially Timed Events Plotting (STEP) method and the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) for accident analysis and modelling. The main issue addressed in this paper is the comparison of the established multi-linear method STEP with the new systemic method FRAM and which new insights the latter provides for accident analysis in comparison to the former established multi-linear method. Since STEP and FRAM are based on a different understandings of the nature of accidents, the comparison of the methods focuses on what we can learn from both methods, how, when, and why to apply them. The main finding is that STEP helps to illustrate what happened, involving which actors at what time, whereas FRAM illustrates the dynamic interactions within socio-technical systems and lets the analyst understand the how and why by describing non-linear dependencies, performance conditions, variability, and their resonance across functions.
Subject headings and genre
- Performance variability
- Systemic models
- Non-linear models
- Functional resonance
- Accident analysis
- Accident modelling
- TECHNOLOGY
- TEKNIKVETENSKAP
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
- Woltjer, RogierLinköpings universitet,CSELAB - Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory,Tekniska högskolan,Interaktiva och kognitiva system(Swepub:liu)rogwo49 (author)
- Norwegian University Science and Technology NTNUDepartment of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
- In:RELIABILITY ENGINEERING and SYSTEM SAFETYLondon, UK : Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.95:12, s. 1269-1275, s. 19-260951-8320
- In:Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications.London, UK : Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.95:12, s. 1269-1275, s. 19-269780415485135
Internet link
- http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17639Link to Ph.D. Thesis
- http://www.sintef.no/project/Building%20Safety/Publications/003-ESREL-2008-FRAM-herrera-woltjer.pdfLink to publication
- https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62293
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003
- https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17595
Find in a library
- RELIABILITY ENGINEERING and SYSTEM SAFETY (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)
To the university's database
- 1 of 1
- Previous record
- Next record
- To hitlist
Find more in SwePub
- By the author/editor
- A Herrera, I
- Woltjer, Rogier
- Articles in the publication
- RELIABILITY ENGI ...
- Safety, Reliabil ...
- By the university
- Linköping University
Search outside SwePub
- Extend your search to:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - National Library Systems
- LIBRIS.kb.se
