SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ltu-61420"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ltu-61420" > The European union ...

The European union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience : Lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries

Priest, Sally J. (författare)
Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University
Suykens, Cathy (författare)
Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht University
Van Rijswick, Marleen (författare)
Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht University
visa fler...
Schellenberger, Thomas (författare)
University François Rabelais
Goytia, Susana (författare)
Luleå tekniska universitet,Samhällsvetenskap
Kundzewicz, Zbigniew W. (författare)
Institute of Agriculture and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences
Van Doorn-Hoekveld, Willemijn J. (författare)
Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht University
Beyers, Jean-Christophe (författare)
Institute for Environmental and Energy Law, KU Leuven
Homewood, Stephen (författare)
Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2016
2016
Engelska.
Ingår i: Ecology and Society. - 1708-3087. ; 21:4
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Diversity in flood risk management approaches is often considered to be a strength. However, in some national settings, and especially for transboundary rivers, variability and incompatibility of approaches can reduce the effectiveness of flood risk management. Placed in the context of increasing flood risks, as well as the potential for flooding to undermine the European Union’s sustainable development goals, a desire to increase societal resilience to flooding has prompted the introduction of a common European Framework. We provide a legal and policy analysis of the implementation of the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) in six countries: Belgium (Flemish region), England, France, the Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden. Evaluation criteria from existing legal and policy literature frame the study of the Directive and its effect on enhancing or constraining societal resilience by using an adaptive governance approach. These criteria are initially used to analyze the key components of the EU approach, before providing insight of the implementation of the Directive at a national level. Similarities and differences in the legal translation of European goals into existing flood risk management are analyzed alongside their relative influence on policy and practice. The research highlights that the effect of the Floods Directive on increasing societal resilience has been nationally variable, in part because of its focus on procedural obligations, rather than on more substantive requirements. Analysis shows that despite a focus on transboundary river basin management, existing traditions of flood risk management have overridden objectives to harmonize flood risk management in some cases. The Directive could be strengthened by requiring more stringent cooperation and providing the competent authorities in international river basin districts with more power. Despite some shortcomings in directly affecting flood risk outcomes, the Directive has positively stimulated discussion and flood risk management planning in countries that were perhaps lagging behind

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law -- Law (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Law
Rättsvetenskap

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy