SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ltu-92075"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ltu-92075" > An Integrated Stati...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction

Kumar Singh, Abhinav (author)
Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G. B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India
Kumar, Pankaj (author)
Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G. B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India
Ali, Rawshan (author)
Department of Petroleum, Koya Technical Institute, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil 44001, Iraq
show more...
Al-Ansari, Nadhir, 1947- (author)
Luleå tekniska universitet,Geoteknologi
Kumar Vishwakarma, Dinesh (author)
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G. B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India
Singh Kushwaha, Kuldeep (author)
Centre for Water Engineering and Management, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi 835205, India
Charan Panda, Kanhu (author)
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Sagar, Atish (author)
Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR—Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
Mirzania, Ehsan (author)
Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
Elbeltagi, Ahmed (author)
Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
Kuriqi, Alban (author)
CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal; Civil Engineering Department, University for Business and Technology, 10000 Pristina, Kosovo
Heddam, Salim (author)
Laboratory of Research in Biodiversity 17 Interaction Ecosystem and Biotechnology, Agronomy Department, Hydraulics Division, Faculty of Science, University 20 Août 1955, Route El Hadaik, Skikda 21000, Algeria
show less...
Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G B. Pant, University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India Department of Petroleum, Koya Technical Institute, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil 44001, Iraq (creator_code:org_t)
2022-07-05
2022
English.
In: Sustainability. - : MDPI. - 2071-1050. ; 14:3
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Nowadays, great attention has been attributed to the study of runoff and its fluctuation over space and time. There is a crucial need for a good soil and water management system to overcome the challenges of water scarcity and other natural adverse events like floods and landslides, among others. Rainfall–runoff (R-R) modeling is an appropriate approach for runoff prediction, making it possible to take preventive measures to avoid damage caused by natural hazards such as floods. In the present study, several data-driven models, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), were used for rainfall–runoff prediction of the Gola watershed, located in the south-eastern part of the Uttarakhand. The rainfall–runoff model analysis was conducted using daily rainfall and runoff data for 12 years (2009 to 2020) of the Gola watershed. The first 80% of the complete data was used to train the model, and the remaining 20% was used for the testing period. The performance of the models was evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBAIS) indices. In addition to the numerical comparison, the models were evaluated. Their performances were evaluated based on graphical plotting, i.e., time-series line diagram, scatter plot, violin plot, relative error plot, and Taylor diagram (TD). The comparison results revealed that the four heuristic methods gave higher accuracy than the MLR model. Among the machine learning models, the RF (RMSE (m3/s), R2, NSE, and PBIAS (%) = 6.31, 0.96, 0.94, and −0.20 during the training period, respectively, and 5.53, 0.95, 0.92, and −0.20 during the testing period, respectively) surpassed the MARS, SVM, and the MLR models in forecasting daily runoff for all cases studied. The RF model outperformed in all four models’ training and testing periods. It can be summarized that the RF model is best-in-class and delivers a strong potential for the runoff prediction of the Gola watershed.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Samhällsbyggnadsteknik -- Vattenteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Civil Engineering -- Water Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Samhällsbyggnadsteknik -- Geoteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Civil Engineering -- Geotechnical Engineering (hsv//eng)

Keyword

MARS
SVM
RF
rainfall
runoff
rainfall–runoff modeling
Soil Mechanics
Geoteknik

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view