Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-37097" >
How old is old for ...
How old is old for implant therapy in terms of implant survival and marginal bone levels after 5-11 years?
-
- Etöz, Onur (author)
- Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Department of Periodontology, Gazi University, Turkey
-
- Bertl, Kristina (author)
- Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Med Univ Vienna, Univ Clin Dent, Div Oral Surg, Vienna, Austria,Department of Periodontology
-
- Kukla, Edmund (author)
- Comprehensive Center Unit, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
-
show more...
-
- Ulm, Christian (author)
- Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
-
- Ozmeric, Nurdan (author)
- Department of Periodontology, Gazi University, Turkey
-
- Stavropoulos, Andreas (author)
- Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Med Univ Vienna, Univ Clin Dent, Div Conservat Dent & Periodontol, Vienna, Austria; Univ Geneva, Univ Clin Dent Med CUMD, Div Regenerat Dent & Periodontol, Geneva, Switzerland,Department of Periodontology
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2021-01-20
- 2021
- English.
-
In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 32:3, s. 337-348
- Related links:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show more...
-
https://www.onlineli...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- AimTo evaluate implant survival and marginal bone levels (MBLevel) at least 5 years after implant installation in patients ≥ 65 years old.MethodsPatient records were screened retrospectively for the following inclusion criteria: (1) ≥ 65 years of age at the time of implant installation, and (2) ≥ 5‐year radiographic follow‐up or registered implant loss. Association between patient‐ and implant‐related data with radiographically assessed data [i.e., implant survival, mean MBLevel (i.e., average of mesial and distal level), maximum marginal bone loss (i.e., either mesial or distal loss; maximum MBLoss)] were statistically evaluated by mixed effects multi‐level regression models.ResultsTwo‐hundred‐eighteen implants in 74 patients were included with a mean follow‐up of 6.2 years (range: 5 to 10.7 years); 4 early and 6 late implant losses have been registered (implant survival rate: 95.4%). Mean MBLevel and maximum MBLoss was 1.24 ± 0.9 mm and 1.48 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Maximum MBLoss < 2 mm, 2 to 5 mm, and ≥ 5 mm was found in 70.7, 28.8, and 0.5% of the implants, respectively. For both, mean MBLevel and maximum MBLoss, age presented a slightly protective effect (mean MBLevel: Coef. ‐0.041, p = 0.016; maximum MBLoss: Coef. ‐0.045, p = 0.014).ConclusionThe high implant survival rate (95.4%), low mean MBLevel (1.24 mm), and low frequency of maximum MBLoss ≥ 5 mm (0.5%) observed herein after 5 to 11 years follow‐up, suggest that older age should not be considered as a limiting factor for implant treatment.
Subject headings
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database