SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-6531"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-6531" > Impact of salivary ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Impact of salivary contamination during placement of implants with simultaneous bony augmentation in iliac bone in sheep

Jinno, Yohei (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Johansson, Krister (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Stocchero, Michele (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
show more...
Toia, Marco (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Galli, Silvia (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Stavropoulos, Andreas (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Becktor, Jonas P (author)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2019
2019
English.
In: British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 0266-4356 .- 1532-1940. ; 57:10, s. 1131-1136
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Our aim was to investigate the possible impact of contamination with saliva on osseointegration during placement of implants with simultaneous bone augmentation. Six hemispheric shape bone defects (8mm in diameter×4mm deep) were prepared in each iliac bone of six sheep. A dental implant (2.9mm in diameter×10mm long) was placed in the centre of each defect, and then pairs of defects were filled with one of the following bone augmentation materials: autogenous bone, autogenous bone plus bovine bone, or resorbable biphasic ceramic bone substitute. One site in each augmentation group was impregnated with saliva (contaminated group), while the other was not (non-contaminated group). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) within implant threads were measured after a healing period of five weeks, both in respect of the implant inserted in the augmented bone and in that inserted in the residual bone. Overall results showed that there was a significant difference between the contaminated and non-contaminated group for BIC in the augmented implant (p=0.028), while there were no significant differences in the implant in residual bone (p=0.722). For BAFO, there were no significant differences between the contaminated and non-contaminated groups among the different augmentation materials. The results showed that contamination with saliva during placement of an implant with simultaneous bone augmentation had a serious deleterious effect on osseointegration of the aspect of the implant within the augmented defect. Contamination with saliva during placement of an implant with simultaneous bone augmentation should therefore be avoided.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Keyword

dental implants
osseointegration
surgery
contamination
saliva

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view